ericvonwade.com

Eric immaturity and the Alienation of a loyal group of Good People known as the threadsters

2008-02-16T04:25:00.000-08:00

HardcoreHarry
Posts: 2921 Eric, I have no idea what you were telling the folks answering the phone
2/1/2008 10:28 PM But, whatever it was, it was not being forwarded to me in a meaningful manner.

I had no idea you didn't have the books there, otherwise I would not have sat outside the station for an hour and a half! (Just for the record, the last half hour was giving you the benefit of doubt). I can think of a lot more things that I would rather do than sit outside a building on Leopard with street urchins and nasty ole HOs milling about.

=chuckle=

The time spent outside the station thinking got me to thinking that the entire arrangement is completely cattywhompass- backarsewards. If it were me who had borrowed the books I would be traversing hell and high water enduring hazards of mythic proportions to make the books were returned IN PERSON and on bended knee (as I am currently missing that portion of my anatomy lets just agree that it would be the "proverbial bended knee??!!!)

How about we make proper arrangements for next time. Today I left mad enough to kick a puppy (yes the proverbial variety!) and seriously began plotting assort acts of unthinkable mayhem like giving the Pope and the College of Cardinals and the entire New England Patriot's Coaching Staff wedgies and noogies!!!!

No it t’wernt purdy at all!

=growls menacingly=

Right now I am even contemplating subjecting you to the scrutiny of the Fabulous Tiki God, AHMNATAWOHMAN!!

Email me at my wife's email addy and I will forward my address in Port Aransas, I am not really up to driving back out to CC to sit on Leopard again any time soon.

If you would rather, I can send you the P.O. Box here in Port A so you can mail them instead.

I will tell you that it will win no points from AHNATAWOHMAN on He-Manliness, Courage, and Bodacious Acts of Bravery if you mail them.

However, if it closes the chapter on this episode (=Wahahahaha= Chapter...get it???...ahh never mind!...Heh!) it might perhaps be overlooked just this once.

AHMNATAWOHMAN wants a pink shirt form you closet as penance to restore you to you former position in the Tribe.

Hardcore Harry,

Chief of tribe Hardcore

Coconut Messaging Service:
Virginia.shaw@gmail.com

A Trusted Friend Or Is He Selling Out The Congressmen of The Hispanic Caucus Attending A Reception Hosted By Raul Tapia & C2 Group

2008-01-01T22:52:00.000-08:00

Calurosa bienvenida a nuevo embajador mexicano

Líderes nacionales y una delegación de congresistas del Caucus Hispano se dieron cita en una recepción para darle la bienvenida a Arturo Sarukhan, nuevo Embajador de México ante Estados Unidos. El embajador, quien tiene una carrera diplomática impecable y sirvió de consejero de política exterior del presidente mexicano, Felipe Calderón, en las recientes elecciones, departió con los asistentes la recepción ofrecida por Raúl Tapia, de C2 Group, quien, luego de destacar las cualidades profesionales y su larga amistad con el embajador, le recordó a la audiencia la importancia de las relaciones bilaterales entre ambos países y el apoyo incondicional para asegurar el éxito de su gestión.

Sarukhan, por su parte, se mostró conmovido por las muestras de afecto y en parte de su discurso dijo: "Estados Unidos y México no son vecinos, frontera o socios. Somos una familia". También dijo que la reforma migratoria tan esperada en este país tiene que empezar en México, creando mas fuentes de trabajo y mejorando la calidad de vida de la sociedad mexicana.

Gloria Murat; Nando Gómez; Lencho Rendón, de LR Global; el embajador mexicano Arturo Sarukhan y Raúl Tapia, de C2 Group y anfitrión de la recepción. Con ellos a la derecha, Solomón Ortíz, congresista de Texas.

Anne Alonzo, posó para Washington Hispanic, junto al embajador mexicano. También vemos a Raúl Tapia y Jacobo Prado, de Asuntos Latinos de la Embajada de México.

El nuevo embajador mexicano, (izq.), escucha a los congresistas Xavier Becerra, (centro) de California y Solomon Ortíz, de Texas.

El embajador mexicano, Arturo Sarukhan (izq,). disfrutó de la vista del Capitolio Nacional desde la terraza durante la recepción en su honor, escuchando instrucciones por parte de Raúl Tapia. A la derecha, le observa Patricia Gaitán, de Chambers López & Gaitán.

Carlos M. Sada, (centro) ministro para Asuntos Congresionales de la Embajada de México conversa con Mauricio Celis. Les observa Armando Beteta.

Robert Menendez senador de New Jersey, asistió al homenaje al embajador mexicano.

Foro sobre Política de Dialogue on Diversity

Bettie Baca, (izq.), maestra de ceremonias del foro posó junto a Maria Cristina Caballero, presidenta de "Dialogue on Diversity", quien recibe una resolución del congreso en elogio a "Dialogue" de manos de Hilda Solís, congresista de California. Les observa Ivelisse Estrada, de Univisión.

Rubén Hinojosa, congresista de Texas, se dirige a los asistentes.

La doctora Dorothy Height, adquirió el premio "Life Achievement" de "Dialogue". Ella es la presidenta del National Council of Negro Women.

Emilio González, director ejecutivo para "Public Affairs and Strategic Alliances" de Versión, habló a los invitados al Foro acerca de sistemas de comunicaciones.

I''m simply a completely worthless jerk-off with no redeeming qualities whatsoever. i thought so...no wonder ..........

2007-12-13T04:59:00.000-08:00

Polls You must be logged in to vote.

The city council voted to accept an I.D. card, primarily issued by the Mexican government to illegal aliens, as an official form of I.D. for the purposes of obtaining housing, city services, and jobs. Should the city council reverse their decision?
Yes
(94%)
No
(6%)

Who is your cell phone provider?
SPRINT
(31%)
NEXTEL
(7%)
CINGULAR
(25%)
VERIZON
(8%)
U.S. CELLULAR
(7%)
Don''t have one
(10%)
T-Mobile
(11%)

What would you be interested in purchasing from an EvW online store?
Logo T-Shirt
(29%)
Logo Long sleeve T-Shirt
(6%)
Logo Ball Cap
(12%)
Logo Button Down Long Sleeve Polo
(3%)
Logo Coffe Mug
(18%)
Logo Bumper Sticker
(8%)
Logo Pen
(4%)
All of it
(19%)
Do you support the Corpus Christi City Council''s unanimous vote to ban smoking in all resturaunts?
NO, only the business owners should make such a decision.
(77%)
YES, I just hate the smell of smoke when I''m eating.
(23%)

If the Nueces County Judge''s election comes down to a choice between former Mayor Lloyd Neal and incumbent Nueces County Judge Terry Shamsie, who would you vote for?
Terry Shamsie
(38%)
Lloyd Neal
(62%)

Which of the following reasons best represts the reason you didn''t vote in the last election?
I couldn''t leave my internet porn for even 5 minutes.
(27%)
I was on my way to the polls but unfortunately I was raped, beaten, and threated with a gun.
(7%)
I''m too much of a freaking self-centered idiot to consider anything but my next beer buzz.
(10%)
I''m such an important V.I.P. that I couldn''t spare 5 minutes durring the weeks of early voting or the 11 hours on election day.
(17%)
I''m simply a completely worthless jerk-off with no redeeming qualities whatsoever.
(39%)
If the Nueces County Judge''s election comes down to a choice between Joe McComb and incumbent Nueces County Judge Terry Shamsie, who would you vote for?
Joe McComb
(88%)
Terry Shamsie
(12%)

Do you support the "Minutemen" operation in which volunteers stand watch over sections of the U.S. border and report any illegal crossings to authorities?
Yes, it''s about time someone address the problem.
(97%)
No, I think we should have open borders so anyone can come and go as they please.
(3%)

Do you think terrorist bombings in London will cause an increase of support for the War on Terror in Europe?
Yes
(59%)
No
(38%)
No, It''s America''s fault anyway.
(2%)
Do you think the Black Civil Rights Groups and leaders have been doing their best to take care of the survivors from New Orleans?
No, all they have done is complain while others have made donations and volunteered.
(97%)
Yes, someone has to point out that racism caused the problem.
(3%)

Do you support allowing advertisement stickers to be placed on U.S. currency?
Yes
(1%)
No
(96%)
It depends on how much money the Federal Government can make off the deal.
(3%)

Should the phrase "In God We Trust" be removed from American Currency?
Absolutely Not!
(94%)
Yes, it offends me as a sensitive athiest.
(1%)
I wouldn''t know the difference one way or the other.
(5%)
Do you support the proposed “pedestrian only” mile of beach on Padre Island?
Yes, Only if the public has convenient access.
(46%)
No, if they take this mile of beach we''ll loose it all.
(49%)
Yes, even if they take the whole 75 miles of beach.
(4%)

Do you support illegal immigration reform consisting of a partial wall on our southern boarder and making illegal entry to the U.S. a felony?
Yes, it''s just common sense.
(97%)
No, because I think it''s wrong to have boarders.
(3%)

For Judge of Nueces County
Lloyd Neal (Republican)
(93%)
Larry Olivarez (Democrate)
(7%)
For Sheriff of Nueces County
Jimmy Rodriguez (Democrate)
(12%)
Jim Kalen (Republican)
(88%)

For District 32 State Representitive
Gene Seamen (Republican)
(87%)
Juan Garcia (Democrat)
(13%)

When looking at 2007 from a personal perspectifve, which of the following represents your viewpoint?
I am more positive for 2007 than 2006.
(61%)
I am less positive for 2007 than 2006
(39%)

The Serpent IN the Garden January 14, 1996 Houston: Inaction Allowed Abuser To Roam For 10 Years.

2007-07-18T02:45:00.000-07:00

If this was leaked to the media did the Corpus Christi Caller Times tell us about this pedophile?

Did the Caller publish any stories on this matter?

And the CCISD Board did they inform the community?

The Serpent IN the Garden January 14, 1996 Houston: CCISD board President Henry Nuss AQUIESCED. CCISD eagerly supplied pedophile with young patients - even after he had been publicly charged.

CORPUS CHRISTI - James Plaisted was a respected child psychologist, a deacon in one of the city's largest Baptist congregations and the father of four.

He also was a child molester so brazen he escorted little girls into church and fondled them under his coat while listening to the sermon.

Parents knew. So did church pastors, school officials and state regulators. But few did anything to stop him, and those who tried were remarkably unsuccessful.

It took 10 years to get Plaisted behind bars. Only he knows how many children he molested during that time.

Last month, Plaisted - already serving a two-year federal prison term for luring a Texas patient to Boston to continue molesting her -was brought back to Corpus Christi in chains.

He pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting four girls and was sentenced to 40 years in prison.

State regulators have yet to revoke his license to practice psychology.

""I think the Plaisted case is the model of what happens when the system fights with itself," said Susan Snyder, a Kingsville attorney and former prosecutor who tried to lock up Plaisted in 1992.

""Obviously, there have been safeguards in place to prevent this man all along, but either (state officials) were too lazy or too busy, or too scared of the politics of going and yanking this man's license," Snyder said. ""It's not the legal system failing. It's the people within the legal system that refuse to let the legal system work."

It's not as if no one tried.

Carmen Alvarado, the mother of the first child to accuse Plaisted more than 10 years ago, sought criminal charges against the therapist and filed an ethics complaint with the Texas Board of Examiners of Psychologists. She alleged that Plaisted had fondled her son's penis during a late-night counseling session.

Alvarado called the Parkdale Baptist Church, where Plaisted, 46, was a deacon.

""They said they were leaving it in God's hands," she recalled.

""I don't think they were thinking straight at the time."

She went to other parents. She got no help.

In the end, it was just her son's word against Plaisted, who told a Corpus Christi jury in 1986 that the 6-year-old child was a habitual liar and a pyromaniac who derived sexual excitement from setting fires. It didn't help that a new prosecutor was assigned to the case just before trial.

The jury acquitted Plaisted; his practice continued.

""It made me mad because when I went for help, all I asked was for them to testify," Alvarado recalled. ""We lost because my son was the only witness we had."

""It was a very tough call to make," said another victim's mother. ""And looking back, I really should have crucified him, but I didn't. I chose not to after talking to my attorney. He told me it would just really traumatize my daughter."

The Corpus Christi woman, who asked not to be identified, said she did confront Plaisted and his wife, who were neighbors in 1984, when her daughter was allegedly molested while spending the night with one of Plaisted's daughters.

""He did not deny it," she said. ""He said he could have done it

in his sleep."

Plaisted's wife laughingly added that she and her husband often made love at night, and he would not remember the next morning, the woman said.

The woman, who was also a member of the Parkdale Baptist Church, recalled telling church officials later about Plaisted's molestations.

""But it didn't seem to make any difference," she said. ""The church really backed him up, and a lot of people left the church after that."

Plaisted's attorney, Doug Tinker, refused to allow the Chronicle to interview his client. The criminal defense lawyer, who earlier this year represented Yolanda Saldivar, who was convicted of murdering Tejano star Selena, declined to discuss the Plaisted case.

The victims' families have since sued the church for negligence, but Parkdale's lawyer argues the congregation should not be held responsible for Plaisted's actions.

""It would be the church's wish to get this thing resolved without causing any additional hurt to anyone," said attorney Van Huseman. But he added, ""If a child gets molested in the middle of the service, how does that get to be the pastor's fault?"

Plaisted - a Nebraska native who served in the Army in Vietnam -came to Corpus Christi in 1982 with impeccable credentials, having earned his doctorate in clinical and child psychology from Auburn University in Alabama in 1981.

He quickly built a private practice, and over the years, developed a good reputation as an expert on brain dysfunction.

The Corpus Christi school district, along with local pediatricians, eagerly supplied him with young patients - even after he had been publicly charged. Members of the church also sought his help, and he had hospital privileges at the prestigious Driscoll Children's Hospital, a South Texas institution known both for quality care and charity.

Neighbors described Plaisted as pleasant, reserved, well-spoken. He was methodical, they said, and liked to work on projects around the house.

Plaisted recruited some of his victims from broken homes, showering the children with gifts, inviting them and their parents to Thanksgiving dinners. One 9-year-old girl who spent the night with Plaisted's daughter told prosecutors the psychologist molested her on the sofa in his living room while he and the children watched the movie "Home Alone"

on video.

He curried favor with his victims' parents by lending them money and refusing repayment, or by buying them air conditioners and other gifts. One mother even acted as a character witness for the therapist during the Alvarado trial, unaware that her own child was being molested.

""The bottom line is this guy had complaints filed against him at the psychology board - and they are serious - and the board doesn't notify the school about the complaints," said Jerry Boswell, director of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights, a group funded by the Church of Scientology (SEE CORRECTION) that documents cases such as Plaisted's. ""And the school is still referring children to this guy."

Corpus Christi school administrators said they used Plaisted infrequently for psychological testing of students, although school records and correspondence indicate he was a consultant from 1983 until he was indicted for child sexual assault in late 1992.

School administrators have identified records of five students referred to him for psychological testing between 1985 and 1992. There are no records prior to 1985.

School board President Henry Nuss, who has served on the board for seven years, said he first heard of the Plaisted case when he was contacted by the Houston Chronicle last week.

""We certainly should be more selective in who we're using," he said.

After Plaisted was charged in the Alvarado case in April 1986, Robert J. Garcia, the school district's special education director, wrote to the state psychology board to ask about the psychologist's record. The agency's executive director replied that Plaisted's license had been suspended, but because the psychologist was in the process of suing to get it back, he remained licensed to practice. The letter gave no details about the nature of the complaints.

""He was given a clean bill of health by the only agency that had anything to say about it," said Dr. Adrian Haston, a psychologist who coordinates the school district's psychological services, and who, years ago, shared an office with Plaisted.

Haston emphasized that none of the schoolchildren referred to Plaisted were molested. ""And we never had anything untoward, any problems of that sort," he said.

Asked why the district would risk using a psychologist once accused of being a child molester, Haston replied, ""This is something the district did, and you can ask the director of special education why."

Garcia said in a recent telephone interview that he could not remember whether he knew about the child molestation charges at the time he wrote to the psychology board.

""All I know is we asked for what his status was and they said he could still practice," he said. ""We knew he was under review, but we didn't know what for.

""Look, the state board of psychologists, they're the ones that allowed him to continue to practice," Garcia added angrily.

""If anyone should be asked as to why this guy was allowed to continue, it should be the state board of psychology."

Pressed for further details, Garcia abruptly ended the interview and hung up the phone.

Although Plaisted was acquitted in August 1986 in the Alvarado case, the psychology board continued its investigation and ruled in November of that year that Plaisted had violated professional standards.

The board officially suspended his license for two years, but said he would be allowed to resume his practice in three months.

Meanwhile, Plaisted challenged the suspension in state district court in Austin, arguing the psychology board had unfairly considered allegations that had not been introduced during his hearing, denying him the opportunity to defend himself against them. The judge agreed, and in January 1987 reversed Plaisted's suspension.

While the board was investigating Plaisted's case, they were contacted by Corpus Christi psychologist George Kramer.

Kramer, who had hired Plaisted in 1982 before Plaisted was licensed, told the board to subpoena records of the state Department of Human Resources. It did, and found other instances of alleged molestation by Plaisted.

In April 1989, the board reached an agreement with the psychologist that allowed him to keep his license if he agreed to be supervised for 11/2years. Plaisted was to treat children only in the presence of an associate or in a location where he could be observed by a television monitor. He also was to pay to have Corpus Christi psychologist Joseph Horvat supervise his casework.

Horvat met with Plaisted weekly, but after a year - convinced that Plaisted was doing nothing wrong - he recommended the supervision be terminated six months early. The board decided to continue the supervision.

""I have found no evidence in any way, shape or form of any behavior on his part which could be in any way construed as unprofessional or unethical," Horvat wrote to the board.

Included in one of his reports to the board was a review of Plaisted's treatment of an 8-year-old girl - a child Plaisted was later charged with molesting.

The board's general counsel, Barbara Holthaus, acknowledged past actions taken by the agency were inadequate.

""With hindsight, of course it wasn't appropriate, because look at what happened," Holthaus said. But she said the board has since added lay people to its ranks and has a new, tougher state law giving it better enforcement powers.

""Now, if we get a report that a psychologist is molesting a client, we can go before a judge and say we want to temporarily suspend the license," she said.

Holthaus said the board has filed a motion to revoke Plaisted's license, but Plaisted is fighting it.

""It's all kind of moot, because he's incarcerated," she said.

Soon after Plaisted completed his board-ordered supervision, Corpus Christi police received new information from state child welfare workers that Plaisted had been molesting girls at his office, in church and at home in his hot tub.

Former detective Eric Michalak, who now works in Colorado, remembered taking the Plaisted case to a Nueces County assistant district attorney for prosecution.

""He wanted to get a warrant for the doctor and arrest him, because we had very strong evidence against him," Michalak said. ""We had multiple victims and you had a guy in the position he was in, where he had access to all these victims.

You would want to take quick action rather than let it go on for so long."

The prosecutor was overruled by then-District Attorney Grant Jones, Michalak said. ""(Jones) just said, `We're not getting a warrant. We're taking our time.' He wanted the kids reinterviewed by one of the prosecutors.

""Any time you go after someone like that, there's a lot of politics that come into play," Michalak added. ""Instead of stepping in right then, and bringing it out in the open and taking it to a grand jury (for indictment), they delayed."

Jones contends that any delay in prosecution was an effort ""to tie the case down tight. We didn't want to lose him twice,"

said Jones, on whose watch Plaisted was acquitted in the Alvarado case.

Jones called it ""outrageous" the psychology board still hasn't revoked Plaisted's license.

""They should have done it in 1986," he said. ""What they want to do is wait around until you go to trial and you convict him, and then they come in behind your conviction and revoke his license. Well, what's he doing in the meantime? He could be out in the community molesting kids for two years."

Michalak said the case was finally taken to the grand jury several months later after he leaked the information about Plaisted's investigation to the local media.

""It was taking too long, and it wasn't being handled like another case," he said. ""And it was because he was so prominent in the community."

Plaisted was finally indicted in Corpus Christi in October 1992. He posted bond, closed his practice in Corpus Christi, and negotiated an agreement with the psychology board to place his license on inactive status until he could prove his innocence.

He then moved to Boston, where he enrolled in Boston University Law School and successfully completed his first year of studies by May 1994.

While in law school, Plaisted began calling a former patient - the girl whose treatment Horvat had reviewed in Corpus Christi. Plaisted convinced the girl's mother - who was also a patient of his - to bring the girl to Boston for additional therapy.

Plaisted's plans were foiled when a policeman setting up a speed trap in his neighborhood accidentally intercepted on his police radio a sexually explicit telephone call between the girl and Plaisted, who was using a cordless phone.

FBI agents were called in, six other calls were taped, and Plaisted was arrested on June 3, 1994, after he met the girl, then 13, and her mother at the train station and took them to a budget motel.

""The mother wasn't aware" of the molestations, said Adolfo Aguilo, an assistant Nueces County district attorney. ""The mother had a borderline personality disorder - she developed dependency on people -and unfortunately for her the person she developed a dependency on was Dr. Plaisted."

Sgt. Michael Harpster, a police detective from suburban Boston who helped arrest Plaisted, described him as ""very congenial, almost shy."

""He'd answer questions very courteously, but he didn't show any outward signs of knowing the seriousness of the situation," Harpster said.

Last January, Plaisted was sentenced by a federal judge in Boston to a two-year prison term after he pleaded guilty to transporting a minor across state lines to engage in illegal sexual activity.

The Corpus Christi conviction and sentence came almost a year later.

In the end, Plaisted admitted molesting four victims. But prosecutors say no one will ever know how many others failed to come forward.

""I imagine there could be several other victims. Through his practice and the church he probably had access over the years to thousands of children," said Aguilo, the Corpus Christi prosecutor who eventually secured Plaisted's guilty plea.

""To me, any kid that came in contact with this guy was a victim in some way or another," added Michalak.

When Plaisted was sentenced last month, it was a bitter emotional meeting for many of his young victims and their parents, who had been called as witnesses in case Plaisted decided against the plea bargain.

Parents said Plaisted stood up straight, held his head high and looked the judge in the eye. And when he saw the relatives of his former victims, he acted as if he were attending a reunion of old friends, they said. One parent said Plaisted looked as if he thought they were there as supporters or character witnesses.

""He turned around and gave the families a big smile," Alvarado said. ""I couldn't believe it."

Alvarado, who sued Plaisted in civil court, has received a settlement for an undisclosed amount. Her son, now a teen-ager, is still struggling with his past abuse, she said, and she continues to feel betrayed by those who would not join her in speaking out years ago.

""I told them if they had helped me in the beginning, none of this would have happened," she said.

Plaisted timeline

Key dates in the career of Dr. James R. Plaisted:

January 1983: Licensed to practice psychology in Texas.

October 1984: Investigated by Texas Department of Human Resources for allegedly molesting a neighbor's child.

April 1986: Charged in criminal case for allegedly fondling a boy during therapy.

August 1986: Acquitted by jury in Corpus Christi.

October 1992: Indicted for sexual abuse of three Corpus Christi girls.

December 1992: Closed Corpus Christi office; moved to Boston to begin law school.

June 1994: Arrested by FBI agents for luring a 13-year-old former Corpus Christi patient to Boston.

January 1995: Indicted by Corpus Christi grand jury on three counts of aggravated sexual assault for incidents years earlier involving the same girl.

January 1995: Sentenced to two years in federal prison in Boston case.

Dec. 7, 1995: Sentenced to 40 years in state prison by a Corpus Christi judge after pleading guilty to five counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child.

Maturity~"Eric, this is your train, you rob it the way you see fit." and a robber he is.....

2007-05-23T08:22:00.000-07:00

Eric von Wade

Home
Polls
Calendar
Community
Photo Gallery
Store
Articles
Links
Newsletter

Google

Visit our store

Home > Community > General

Community

Add A TopicReply to this message

Click here to return to the topic list Up to topic list | Search
Author Original Message
EVW
Posts: 262

Click here to email EVW

ATTENTION EVERYONE Your are currently viewing this message
5/21/2007 10:40:28 AM
Everyone posting on EricvonWade.com has agreed to this and I would appreciate if all those who have not already been banned would acknowledge that they have read this post and are aware of it's legal implications. Thanks to all of you who are still here.

Reviews, Comments, Communications, and Other Content
Visitors may post reviews, comments, and other content; and submit suggestions, ideas, comments, questions, or other information, so long as the content is not illegal, obscene, threatening, defamatory, invasive of privacy, infringing of intellectual property rights, or otherwise injurious to third parties or objectionable and does not consist of or contain software viruses, political campaigning, commercial solicitation, chain letters, mass mailings, or any form of "spam." You may not use a false e-mail address, impersonate any person or entity, or otherwise mislead as to the origin of your content. EricVonWade.com reserves the right (but not the obligation) to remove or edit such content, but does not regularly review posted content.

Collapse all posts in this thread
Author Replys
Mariner
Posts: 1389

Click here to email Mariner Talk to Mariner on Yahoo! Messenger

Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/21/2007 10:48:06 AM
Eric,

Read and understood.

Good luck at rooting out the vermin. We don''t need personal attacks on anyone at any level.
lil patriot
Posts: 23

Click here to email lil patriot

Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/21/2007 10:50:29 AM
agree
CommonSense
Posts: 1143

Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/21/2007 10:53:47 AM
Roger WILCO

kirt
Posts: 2028

Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/21/2007 11:52:20 AM
I understand and agree, but request clarification on one point. Several of us have expressed support for Ron Paul and have posted things in his favor as a presidential candidate. Is this considered political campaigning and is that now prohibited?
EVW
Posts: 262

Click here to email EVW

Re: Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/21/2007 12:27:37 PM
No Kirt, as always you can express your support or opposition for issues and candidates.
EVW
Posts: 262

Click here to email EVW

Re: If you have any further questions...
5/21/2007 12:29:38 PM
that you believe cannot be answered in this venue..contact me at the following e-mail: ericvonwade@hotmail.com

Thanks for your attention.
lookingglass
Posts: 2450

Click here to email lookingglass

Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/21/2007 1:42:27 PM
Read and understood. It''s always a good idea for all of us to remember our good manners. Thanks for the reminder, Eric.
Cal
Posts: 1337

Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/21/2007 2:05:15 PM
I have no problem with that either.

Calvin
bigo
Posts: 960

Re: Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/21/2007 2:32:06 PM
That means if I come out for Hillary y''all can''t call me obscene names now.
HardcoreHarry
Posts: 2584

Click here to email HardcoreHarry

Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/21/2007 2:48:30 PM
Thanks Eric!

Hardcore Harry
bigo
Posts: 960

Re: Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/21/2007 3:16:51 PM
I guess I find it hard to understand what makes some people tick. I''ve been around quite a while and for the life of me I can''t see why anyone would want to come on a site like this and make personal attacks to the owner, knowing or should knowing full well thatt the verbage they spew will not be taken seriously.

I''m like some of the others on this board. I don''t listen to the Eric VonWade show all the time, because I don''t listen to the radio that much. I don''t agree with him all the time and disagree on some issues. So, I don''t think I''m ""sucking up"" to him. I just enjoy coming to this site and reading the comments, making some and getting different perspectives. I agree, that every one should respect the rules. If not, find another place to vent.
nuecescountyuprisin
Posts: 10

Click here to email nuecescountyuprisin Talk to nuecescountyuprisin on AOL Instant Messenger

Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/21/2007 3:43:31 PM
i agree, again

wonder what brought this on?
Major Carrales
Posts: 1145

Click here to email Major Carrales Talk to Major Carrales on Yahoo! Messenger

Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/21/2007 4:27:17 PM
I''ve been on here a while...all the way back to the days when it was just Randall, Mark, Curmudgeon, Curtis Rock and a few oldies that pop in now and then.

This has always been a friendly site for the exchange of information and even a gathering place for friends. We have been through a lot together including the loss of a respected and well liked member member...Blindbob, and were even their to provide comfort to his beloved when the time came.

Many of us have met and, even through heated exchange and vast differences in Political, Economic and Social beliefs...we have remainded a solid force.

I agree to the terms...it is Eric''s house and we are, from the oldest THREADSTER to the newest lurker, guests here. We should act accordingly.

The 1st Amendment carries a lot of spirit here, but never forget that that applies only to the FEDERAL government in that ""Congress shall make no law"" to the contrary. When you come here your contract is with Mr. Von Wade.

If one likes that not...then they can leave back to whence they came.
curtis rock
Posts: 1906

Click here to email curtis rock Talk to curtis rock on AOL Instant Messenger Talk to curtis rock on Yahoo! Messenger

Agreed.
5/21/2007 5:01:01 PM
Eric has been very generous and allows everyone to say what they want within reason. He''s had the same rules forever now. It''s a shame some new people join on this site who don''t even deserve their handles to be mentioned ruin the experience. I''m assuming they''ve been removed and it''s for the better.
EVW
Posts: 262

Click here to email EVW

Re: Agreed.
5/21/2007 5:53:07 PM
I really do appreciate all of you who exhibit the maturity to respect me and this venue and not use this as some sort of tantrum center. Lets get to having fun again and keep up the great stuff you''ve been doing! Thanks again!
CommonSense
Posts: 1143

Harry!
5/21/2007 8:55:22 PM
Eric says it is ok to pillage again.

Long live Tribe Hardcore!
curmudgeon
Posts: 4781

Click here to email curmudgeon

Did he say anything . . .
5/21/2007 9:00:05 PM
. . . about rape?
CommonSense
Posts: 1143

Re: Did he say anything . . .
5/21/2007 9:02:55 PM
I guess it depends on what your definition of fun is.
Redneck Cabbie
Posts: 14

Click here to email Redneck Cabbie

Re: Re: Agreed.
5/21/2007 10:11:11 PM
Running a message board can be a thankless pain in the butt. Especially for someone with your visibility.

There is a fine line between free speech and yelling ""fire"" in a theater.

I had a weekly radio show in Las Vegas as well as maintaining a message board. I had a couple of guys whose posts on my board nearly cost me my job. It didn''t matter how many disclaimers I used. I finally gave it up.

Good luck, and keep up the good work.
MarkyDeSod
Posts: 140

Re: Re: Agreed.
5/21/2007 10:45:05 PM
Eric, I read and understand. If I am the offending party, please I would appreciate a personal e-mail. No intent here to offend people, but, we do talk politics here, as I understand it, and politics are real and do affect real life. No intent but a healthy debate inteded. :)
The Ranting Man
Posts: 63

Click here to email The Ranting Man

Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/21/2007 6:09:09 PM
Aye aye.
Wild Ape
Posts: 4928

Click here to email Wild Ape

Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/21/2007 6:34:47 PM
Agreed

I must have missed something.

Give the perpetrators hell Eric!
ladrtrk55
Posts: 209

Re: Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/21/2007 7:06:24 PM
Eric, this is your train, you rob it the way you see fit.

(pleae don''t make me explain that line)
LONEWOLF
Posts: 923

Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/21/2007 8:15:06 PM
OoooooKaaaaayyyyy
Brushout
Posts: 26

Click here to email Brushout

Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/21/2007 8:28:56 PM
Read and understood
Elwood Blues
Posts: 507

Click here to email Elwood Blues Talk to Elwood Blues on Yahoo! Messenger

Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/22/2007 9:24:39 AM
Read and understood,Eric..

It''s your house,you make the rules..I''m good with that.
Guido
Posts: 412

Re: Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/22/2007 4:01:09 PM
It''s your rhubarb. You let us rub it, and I will follow your guidelines on how it shall be rubbed.

If I want to rub rhubarbs in another manner, I will set up my own page.
JuanGarseaman
Posts: 12

Click here to email JuanGarseaman

Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/22/2007 4:13:42 PM
Agreed!
Rbt@pw
Posts: 10

Click here to email Rbt@pw

Re: ATTENTION EVERYONE
5/23/2007 9:09:09 AM
No problems here !

Is Timothy a girl or gay?

2007-05-20T21:35:00.000-07:00

Author Original Message
CommonSense
Posts: 1149

Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/8/2007 7:37:41 PM
I posted this within another thread, but I thought I would give it it's own thread so y'all won't overlook it.

I had to type manually because it is a pdf document. I don't want to link to another website that Eric wouldn't approve of.(competitor)

Intergraph Case Number 07-04210125

At approximately 1:52 PM on April 21, 2007, I contacted the victim at 3315 S. Alameda (Doctor's Regional Emergency Room) in reference to a sexual assault report. When contacted, victim #1 had advised that she and suspect #1 (As of a month ago) were boyfriend and girlfriend. Victim added that suspect #1 had been in contact with her since the time of the break-up. Victim added that at approximately 2 am on April 21, 2007, suspect #1 had sent her a text message via her cell phone that he was outside of her apartment. Victim advised that she let suspect #1 into her apartment due to avoid waking up her child. Victim added that suspect #1 was intoxicated. Victim added that this led to him (suspect #1) touching and kissing each other which lated led to sexual intercourse against her will. The assault in question occured in her living room. Victim kept adding that she still loves suspect #1. Sexual assault exam requested was signed by reporting officer.

Case: 07-421125

Y'all can draw your own conclusions. In my opinion, there doesn't seem to be enough here to actually make charges. I'm waiting to see what the rape kit will reveal.

Collapse all posts in this thread
Author Replys
Republic69
Posts: 467

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/8/2007 8:42:47 PM
Did you not read the part about SEXUAL INTERCOURSE AGAINST HER WILL? Despite she says ""she still loves him"", you can love someone and still get raped by them. You can love your wife/girlfriend and she can love you back, but forcing someone into sex, is RAPE, and it does not matter if you love them or not.

If your wife says no to sex, but you still force yourself into her, that is rape, its domestic rape.
CommonSense
Posts: 1149

Here is a novel idea Republic.....
5/8/2007 9:36:33 PM
drop the attitude there spanky. I posted this for everyone to see the report and posted my own opinion. The report speaks for itself.

I''m glad you understand the concept of ""no means no"". That is a concept that most of us men learn at an early age.

Once again I will point out to you as I have for others. Let the investigation play out. The rape kit will hopefully fill in the blanks that the report is missing.

Lighten up man.
curtis rock
Posts: 1902

Click here to email curtis rock Talk to curtis rock on AOL Instant Messenger Talk to curtis rock on Yahoo! Messenger

The problem...
5/9/2007 12:14:50 AM
I just think the problem Is that he is engaged and allegedly having sex with another woman.

Secondly, shouldn''t the Chief of Police be doing things to remove people from the streets who are driving while intoxicated, or did he ride his bike to this woman''s house?

I personally like Bryan, I am a little disappointed. I don''t think he''s a rapist by any means, but I think he made some poor judgement. Just goes to show that everyone makes mistakes. I hope he comes back from vacation and continues doing what he''s been doing.
Cal
Posts: 1342

Re: The problem...
5/9/2007 7:38:15 AM
Just goes to show that everyone makes mistakes.

Even Melody Cooper? And she should Know better,but did it anyway. So saith the Judge.

Now some people are after her hide.
LONEWOLF
Posts: 924

Re: The problem...
5/9/2007 1:57:36 PM
Kinda funny dontcha think that you ""...don''t think he''s a rapist by any means"" but you take her unsubstantiated claim that he was drunk as gospel truth.
army_of_juan
Posts: 64

Click here to email army_of_juan

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 7:56:39 AM
If somebody rapes you,......

I am sorry,.......

but the love is gone.

Pure and simple she wanted to let the whole world know he used her.

Wham bam thank you mam.

That is all it amounted to and she wanted it to mean more.

I didnt, get over it.

Rape is vile!

You don''t love someone after they rape you.

She is desparate.
Republic69
Posts: 467

Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 11:35:11 AM
Army of Juan, you are in need of an internship at the Women''s Shelter.

Have you ever heard of Battered Woman Syndrome? Women can be beaten, raped, sodomized, thrown down a flight of stairs, humiliated, and she will still stay with her husband/lover/boyfriend as a result of psychologically been dependent on him as well as financially for her children.

In your mind, Chief Bryan Smith probably should have URINATED on her like the Annaville rapist, maybe then she would not seem so ""desperate""?!
army_of_juan
Posts: 64

Click here to email army_of_juan

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 10:16:42 PM
Know all about it. Those women dont call up the media and only file police reports when they are very angry (it takes the anger for them to even file). When they file they dont love the loser. After the begin to ""miss him"" then they think they ""love him"".

The girl is ate up with jealousy and this jealousy was used by the political expedient. They wanted to place the chief under the thumb. Women are the tool of power politics usually it works out more subtle and is held over the head for a favor in the future. You want to go after somebody who beats his spouse check out the divorces of some of our leading men.

You will see this was a political stunt.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 9:53:36 AM
She is desperate? Do you know how dumb that sounds? He went to her place why? hmmm obviously only he knows but im sure like most men that are engaged or in a relationship with their significant other its purely for SEX he wanted it..she didnt call him he TEXT her..and shes the desperate one? NO shes the smart one for bringing this out in the open and making him think now ""what the heck did i do""..its amazing when people do things wrong and AFTER the fact they want to know WHY are you doing this to me? WHY are you letting the public know this? SO no if it wasnt rape fine, if it was justice will hopefully be served..Chief Bryan Smith has issues, he was always at the Surf Club with his fiancee and even then HE had a roving eye on every little thing that passed by him..i think hes just really high on himself because of the position he holds..I have seen it with my own 2 eyes...Too many people in high positions in this community just need to realize that people are watching
Guido
Posts: 413

Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 2:14:17 PM
Unless there is a fairly copious amount of vaginal tearing indicating that the sex was most likely not consensual, this case is going to be a pretty big loser for the prosecution, regardless of whether a rape occurred or not.

First, there are only two witnesses to the alleged offense, the accuser and the accused. Second, any defense attorney worth his salt will point out that the suspect texted her that he was outside--a locked door. The victim will likely be grilled about why she just didn''t call police. Then, he will jump on the fact that she said she still loves him. By the end of her testimony, he will have the jury accepting the premise that she is a jilted woman trying to get her man back by anyway possible.

Is that the truth? We will likely never know the true answer to that. The only thing that is certain is that there is most likely a copious amount of reasonable doubt in this case.

If the alleged victim was raped, she will probably never find justice in this case. If she was not raped, Smith will most likely never clear his name, as the court of public opinion is not contricted by reasonable doubt requirements. The only winners will be the defense attorneys who will make a bundle on this case.

Is that the way it should be? No. Is that the way it is much of the time? Yes.
Cal
Posts: 1342

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 3:55:35 PM
The only winners will be the defense attorneys

Should this go to trial,I will be there in a packed courtroom listening very intently to testimony by all parties. Then I will write my answer on a piece of paper,give it to a friend to hold and make/take bets on the verdict of the jury.
LONEWOLF
Posts: 924

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 4:06:45 PM
This case will never see a courtroom.
Cal
Posts: 1342

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 8:21:31 PM
If the case never goes to court,then I won''t be able to make bets.

Oh well,life will go on with or without Chief Bryan Smith.
CommonSense
Posts: 1149

Here is the contradiction in her statement....
5/9/2007 4:25:01 PM
Victim added that this led to him (suspect #1) touching and kissing each other which later led to sexual intercourse against her will.

The end of the statement states that the sex was against her will. However, she seemed a willing participant up to that point. Unfortunately all this statement really shows is her word against his, and we still don''t know if any of this took place or not. Remember the Duke players?

Let the investigation play out.
Guido
Posts: 413

Re: Here is the contradiction in her statement....
5/9/2007 4:57:45 PM
The difference between this and the Duke case is that one of the accused could prove he was innocent.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Here is the contradiction in her statement....
5/9/2007 5:23:52 PM
Here''s the thing he should not have been there anyway..he is ENGAGED!!!!..it makes him look guilty no matter what..and it makes him look exactly what it is a drunk man wanting a booty call at 2AM and they always call on thier ex...awwww poor Bryan Smith..you made yourself look like an ass regardless of the outcome...Next time think with your OTHER HEAD!
CommonSense
Posts: 1149

Food for thought Timothy....
5/9/2007 5:42:51 PM
Did this alleged sexual encounter occur that day? We still don''t know. That is when the report was filed but so far that is the only thing indicating that something happened that day if it did.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Food for thought Timothy....
5/9/2007 6:41:59 PM
The truth always comes out :)
Cal
Posts: 1342

Re: Re: Food for thought Timothy....
5/9/2007 8:34:05 PM
Since when!!!! :D :D :D

With todays lawyers the truth will never come out!!!
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Re: Food for thought Timothy....
5/10/2007 7:30:16 AM
If the truth doesnt come out it wont be because of the attorneys,,it will be simply because of the position Bryan Smith holds in this city, Corpus Christis SUPPOSIBLY Finest are good for this prancing around with their badges and their status and KNOWING that even if the Tex Rangers look into this MOST cases are thrown out simply cause CC Finest never seem to do any wrong...they can speed and NO BIGGIE, shit when i see that i catch right up next to them showing them that if you can do it SO can I..they are little boys with a toy on their side and a toy in their pants ,,and 99.5% know it.. whats good for the goose is good for the gander
Guido
Posts: 413

Re: Re: Re: Re: Food for thought Timothy....
5/10/2007 2:43:20 PM
The difference is, if Bryan Smith was not in his position, this would not be headline news. If he was a welder''s helper, she probably would not have had anything to do with him in the first place. Losing a work-a-day guy would be no biggie and she would find another, easy enough.

Even the report, where she states they were kissing and touching EACH OTHER, indicates that she welcomed him. Yes, Bryan Smith is a dumbass and a lech for making the booty call, but the alleged victim opened the door. She had to know why he was there and perhaps even was glad he was there.

My guess is that she got ticked off when he went back to business as usual. The only person with no fault in this matter is the fiancee'', though I have no idea why she went before the cameras with Smith when the announcement was made. She should have given him his walking papers well before that time.

Yeah, many men are dogs, but many women are also to blame. If a man wants to stray, he doesn''t have to look far to find a skank to stray with.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Food for thought Timothy....
5/10/2007 4:10:59 PM
You know not all women go after men that hold higher positions..some men tend to SEEK women that have no clue WHOM they are, its a POWER thing..shoot i''d rather have a down to earth guy that isnt in the publics eye that way IF and WHEN he were to screw up you don''t look like the idiot that stands with him on his side infront of the media..a woman like that needs to check herself at the door...i''d be SEE YA LATER BABE..Id rather be someones priority as opposed to their option..and thats exactly what he did to both women they were both OPTIONS...i''d be putting that engagement ring on ebay to the highest bidder ..LOL
bigo
Posts: 958

Re: Re: Re: Re: Food for thought Timothy....
5/18/2007 9:42:07 PM
My pappy always said there''s nothing worse that a pissed off woman. I wonder if she''s any kin to the Chiefs ex??

Oh well, I don''t foresee her posting much longer. And good luck getting those personal emails published in the CCCT''s.
army_of_juan
Posts: 64

Click here to email army_of_juan

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 10:25:21 PM
I agree with you Timothy except she was desparate. Bryan has a roving eye and all the other Quorum Club Surf Club etc etc etc

But this one was a pre meditated booty call.

I bet there is video as well but it will tell the real story.

She was losing him.

I apologize if it disagrees with you.
nuecescountyuprisin
Posts: 11

Click here to email nuecescountyuprisin Talk to nuecescountyuprisin on AOL Instant Messenger

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/15/2007 1:36:09 PM
smith was drunk, but he wasn''t drinking his pimp juice. old dude slipped.
booty calls are not hard to pull off, engaged or not.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/15/2007 2:26:40 PM
Slipped? Hmmm you mean CCPD doesn''t supply those devices that you wear around your neck so when you SLIP you can press it and someone will be there to help you get up? I can buy him some Pimp Juice on Ebay that way next time he WONT SLIP..LOL

20 Cans PIMPJUICE ENERGY DRINK by NELLY NEW SIZE

US $32.00

curmudgeon
Posts: 4780

Click here to email curmudgeon

He was just tryin'' . . .
5/15/2007 3:08:03 PM
. . . out that stuff that promises instant male enhancement (I think we just used to refer to this as ""wood"") that is advertised on KEYS.
Cal
Posts: 1342

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/15/2007 3:33:47 PM
Heard at morning coffee break this morning he is getting 6mos vacation as that is how long The Rangers are going to take for the investigation.

I smells da rat!!!
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/15/2007 5:18:23 PM
Hmmm just watched the news yup 6 more months and he still states that all sex was CONSENSUAL..i hope all the embarrasment was worth it..he should have bought a FLESHLIGHT if he needed to get off that bad
CommonSense
Posts: 1149

I would hate to be a criminal with......
5/15/2007 4:13:53 PM
some of you on the jury. Y''all have already convicted him before the investigation is over. If he is guilty, then he needs to be punished. If he is innocent, then he should be able to continue on with his work.

Keep in mind people...

Everything at this point is her word against his. Hard to convict on that. They need to be able to find physical evidence to support her case. That is why I keep stating that it will be interesting to see what the rape kit reveals. Also remember, that the rape kit can show she had sex, but it may not tell with who if there is no DNA. I hate to keep bringing this up, but remember the Duke case?
Cal
Posts: 1342

Re: I would hate to be a criminal with......
5/15/2007 5:30:13 PM
Don''t get us wrong. We agree with you. We are just wondering why six months for the rape kit results.

If I were in that position and I had nothing to hide,I would be screeming bloody murder for a poly test.

Even if he did have consenual sex with why not just come out and say so. Guess he could want his cake and eat it also.

I will not say he is guilty nor will I say he is innocent as I was not there and I do not know the facts of the investigation. I can and as many others can only form an opinion based on what is put out i9n the media. After the job No. 3 in ratings did on the pastor in Portland.I will form an opinion on the other two,
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: I would hate to be a criminal with......
5/15/2007 6:04:04 PM
Hmmm enough evidence to go infront of the Grand Jury...impressive...cant wait May 25th
CommonSense
Posts: 1149

The Mayor called the head of DPS....
5/15/2007 9:11:21 PM
and requested that the investigation be completed sooner. Apparently the lab that will do the testing on the rape kit is understaffed and stated it would take 6 months to complete. However, a phone call to the lab has them completing it in 2-3 months.

Another thing to check is the phone record. They can check to see if the text message was sent at the time she indicates in the report. They may not be able to determine the message.
Cal
Posts: 1342

Re: The Mayor called the head of DPS....
5/16/2007 8:33:40 AM
Wonder who hit Garrett on the head to wake him up and make the phone call?

Maybe Gibbs bopped him!! :) :) :)

Well anyway,he did something right.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: The Mayor called the head of DPS....
5/16/2007 9:27:34 AM
First off they could have requested to see her cell phone it would show a text message from him and the time sent they dont actually need to pull records, if she was smart she would have locked the message as evidence
Guido
Posts: 413

Re: Re: Re: The Mayor called the head of DPS....
5/17/2007 7:58:54 PM
First of all, six months WAS fast action from the DPS lab. Many cases take up to a year, depending upon the agency. Usually, you just get in line with all the other sex crimes. In order for this woman''s test to move up, obviously someone''s wait, perhaps that 5 year-old girl raped by an uncle, will be longer now.

Sadly, that wait will be for naught, as the defense already seems to be stipulating that sex occured. DNA will not show anything more than who made a deposit, not how forcefully said deposit was placed. There are no ""rape sperms"". There are no semen dressed as pirates boarding the undefended vagina vessel.

In other words, the DNA is actually useless in this case. Henry Garrett grandstanded by calling in a favor, and then could only cut the wait by about 1/2 to 2/3. I suppose he doesn''t pull as much weight as he thought.

Basically, the D.A. will go with her word against his to the Grand Jury. The defense will have no chance to rebut any testimony or offer their own side beyond what is allowed by the prosecution. However, once an indictment is handed down (if it happens), then the defense can go to work.

If a D.A. really wants to indict someone, it will happen. No amount of innocence will prevent it. Grand Juries can be stacked and they can also be hoodwinked. Chucky is pretty good at both.
winston
Posts: 108

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 12:21:14 AM
I believe we had a certified CSI Lab @ CCPD but Skip Noe refused to Recertify it when Alvarez was running for Sheriff.

So we have no lab because of this clown.

Blame him for the next six months.

BTW he voted for a raise for himself and the Waters Group.

What a guy
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 8:27:07 AM
If the people in this city havent noticed we have NOTHING in this town..why? because of ALL the clowns on city council..all we have is the stupid beach,,,this isnt a real city..no amusements parks for our kids, no places like the Japanese Tea garden in SA..our kids have nothing...and why? Because of the close minded people, they dont want change in this city..WAKE UP people its like stagnate water..pretty disgusting..our streets are so ripped up and all they continue doing is putting a band-aid on the situation, no wonder when our kids graduate and move away, whats here to offer them? NOTHING!
CommonSense
Posts: 1149

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 9:02:55 AM
If it''s so bad here Timothy, why don''t you move. Find a place that is more to your liking. Personally, I can''t see living somewhere that I don''t like.
bigo
Posts: 958

Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 9:03:37 AM
Even if there were a Lab in CC, it wouldn''t be wise to do the work on a high profile case like this locally. There would be too much room for claims of ""fixing"" the results.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 11:18:01 AM
I plan on moving this coming year..im in the process of informing the news stations and writing into the paper about little scandals first about a few people in this city, like some on city council that i know personally..ummm also a local news anchor about his infidelity along with all the proof that i have in my posession..just to make people squirm first...its kinda fun to see people squirm when they get themselves in hot water :) So Commonsense..poor choice of name for you..becareful who you piss off.
Cal
Posts: 1342

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 11:47:44 AM
Timothy:

""Payton Place"" was long ago and in a far distant land. We live here in BWBBTB and do not want to change our lifestyle.

We get our ""Soap Operas"" on local TV. Granted they are fiction,but alas,we have our real life dramas here in BWBBTB and proud of out limited exposure.

An expose would bring on many heart attacks and we could loose politicians.
Sure wish you had something on Ted Kennedy,Nancy Peloci and the rest of
The Cereal State."" :D :D Even I could be prone to heart attacks.
CommonSense
Posts: 1149

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 12:17:18 PM
So Commonsense..poor choice of name for you..becareful who you piss off.

Since you seem to know me so well, what should my name be? I will leave it up to the ones here that have met me to decide if it fits or not. Have fun with this as I will not be taking it personally.

As far as your scandals, I would suggest a little maturity on your part. Most of us left high school many years ago and don''t intend on looking back. If you are doing it to make people squirm, that shows a lack of character on your part.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 12:30:07 PM
I plan on showing maturity..i will no longer spend my time posting on here..this site is more like high school..i have stated nothing but FACTS..and frankly i could care less what happens to those peoples lives that CHOSE to screw around. When the media gets all the emails that transpired along with the short video clip of the one you worship on here showing me his member in between his radio segments..LOL..., you make your bed..lay in it..he cheated in the past and this is his second time..good luck on your upcomming renewal on your co-anchor position in June
Guido
Posts: 413

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 1:39:00 PM
(Timothty)...like some on city council that i know personally..ummm also a local news anchor about his infidelity along with all the proof that i have in my posession..just to make people squirm first...

Dang girl! Just how many different hoohaas have you seen? Is that a hobby of yours, or do they just walk up and drop their pants? Geez, it would seem that you have an affinity for this sort of thing, as you have so much evidence. Pity the poor soul who ever confides in you.
nuecescountyuprisin
Posts: 11

Click here to email nuecescountyuprisin Talk to nuecescountyuprisin on AOL Instant Messenger

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 5:50:38 PM
timothy''s a girl?
curmudgeon
Posts: 4780

Click here to email curmudgeon

I think . . .
5/18/2007 8:12:19 PM
. . . slut would be more appropriate.
nuecescountyuprisin
Posts: 11

Click here to email nuecescountyuprisin Talk to nuecescountyuprisin on AOL Instant Messenger

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 8:30:42 PM
BWBBTB? wtf
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 9:06:27 PM
Why am i considered a SLUT when Eric sought me out knowingly he was married..i had NO CLUE who in the heck he was...i have emails to PROVE i asked him over and over if he was married and to be honest and he said he wasnt ALSO he said and i quote "" i should be flattered that hes emailing me"" i''m thinking WHY? #1 im far from a slut and #2 why is it when a MAN does something wrong a woman should shut her mouth well guess what it doesn''t work that way...oh and Eric i was going to keep the rest of everything to myself ( and you know what i mean) but its these IDIOTS that are going to let me spill it all..you can thank them for egging me on!
curmudgeon
Posts: 4780

Click here to email curmudgeon

You''ll have to excuse me . . .
5/18/2007 9:19:46 PM
. . . I thought someone who was screwin'' guys indiscriminately was a slut. Guys think with their pecker.
Guido
Posts: 413

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 9:30:16 PM
Hmm, it is funny that nothing is ever Timothy''s fault. It is the fault of the ""IDIOTS"" that Timbo is going to ""spill"" the beans. Funny how that less than nine hours ago she was going to stop wasting her time posting here. Yet, here she is. I suppose that is our fault, as well.

As far as spilling the beans, who cares beyond you and your accused? This site is probably only regulary perused by a handful of people, most of whom either support EVW or, like me, wouldn''t give a rat''s a$$ about what he does or with whom he does it.

In other words, you want to get into an intelligent discussion about issues of the day, you are welcome to it. If you want to spill your guts about how you were robbed of your chastity, start up your own web page. It has been done before.

The first post or two, it was a diversion. Now, it is just pathetic. If you have those e-mails and whatever photos, send them off to whomever. I seriously doubt that anyone will care. Sure, it might cause a giggle around a watercooler or two on an otherwise achingly dull Monday morning, but it will be forgotten by lunch time.

winston
Posts: 108

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith Your are currently viewing this message
5/19/2007 12:37:21 AM
Even if their lab was certified which it isn''t, Mr.Smith has already pretty much admitted his DNA would be there, since he admitted the sex was consensual.

As for Timothy, I am totally interested in what she has to say.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/19/2007 9:05:25 AM
Thank you Winston..and again the only way i know these couple of men that i have stated on here is because THEY approached me..i dont need to go out and seek men, i could care less what you do for a living and what your status is in this community, but when lies start to surface damn right i will speak up..mess with fire and you will get burned so if you''d like i can offer you all and any copies of these emails along with the short video clip of what some people call him the poor accused. Eric you''d fit right in with alot of politicians..you sit there with that fake smug smile, when you cheat and think no one will find out..remember when i told you people saw us together and told me you were married, thought i was too stupid to check into it...i love seeking out cheating spouses, yours was too easy. Isnt there a morality clause in your contract at Channel 10? So you said anyway..unless that was a lie too, shoot i dont know how people can take your word for anything when every other word out of your mouth is a lie. I should have known better when the only place you could meet me at was the lease in Sinton after 11PM that Sunday, and also when you said you couldnt foot the bill for a hotel and you dont carry cash so you asked me to pay for it..LOL what a joke i am.. i''m sure you laughed about it all the time...i wondered why i never could go to your house. I know now, and so does everyone else :)
LONEWOLF
Posts: 924

LISTEN UP!
5/19/2007 12:58:08 PM
You''re WAY out of line punk -- knock it off!
bigo
Posts: 958

Re: LISTEN UP!
5/19/2007 1:03:20 PM
Timbo..

You love seeking out cheating spouses and you talk about morality. What am I missing here??????
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: LISTEN UP!
5/19/2007 1:10:35 PM
PUNK? Hmmmm good choice of words..but WRONGGGGGGG again, im far from a PUNK..and why is it making your skin crawl? Is it affecting you that i''m speaking the TRUTH...see thats that thing here...it''s ALL TRUTH every bit of it..tsk tsk...it''s nice when to know i have PROOF..if i was a private investigator i would just be doing my job..no? I think it''s so humorous though that men get themselves in these predicaments..im just the messenger :) LOL..it will teach a man next time before cheating though WONT IT!
curtis rock
Posts: 1902

Click here to email curtis rock Talk to curtis rock on AOL Instant Messenger Talk to curtis rock on Yahoo! Messenger

You may not be a punk...
5/19/2007 4:30:56 PM
But I think you''re a bitch. I hope Eric removes your bullshit posts.
Elwood Blues
Posts: 503

Click here to email Elwood Blues Talk to Elwood Blues on Yahoo! Messenger

Re: Re: LISTEN UP!
5/20/2007 11:20:53 AM
I think you picked the wrong venue to air all this out in,""Timothy"".Although I haven''t been here as long as some of the other Threadsters,I believe I can say with confidence that no one posts here out of unquestioned fealty to Eric.The folks here are a community in and of themselves,and as such,don''t appreciate their forum being used to air personal vendettas..no matter who they''re directed at..and from what you''ve posted here,you come across as having some personal ""score"" to settle with Eric.

If you want a good debate on the issues of the day..this is the place to find it..but if you think that by posting a few e-mails and casting aspersions on Eric''s character that you''ll somehow ""expose"" him here and cause the Threadsters to rethink their opinions of him,you''re sadly mistaken.This board isn''t about him and it doesn''t revolve around him.I''m not an Eric fan,but that stems from his political and ideological views..I couldn''t care less what he does in his personal life,and I don''t think anyone else here does,either..however,I do sincerely appreciate his making this forum possible for all to enjoy.

The hostility you''re encountering here stems from your obvious attempt to use this forum in a way people don''t agree with,not from any blind loyalty to Eric.I''d suggest that whatever personal issues you have with him,you take them up with him personally,and not air them here..that''s not what this forum or the Threadsters are about.
Guido
Posts: 413

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/19/2007 4:16:23 PM
I am in my late forties. In all my years, I have not once had a woman, who I was involved with, ask if I was married. If you have to think of asking the question, alarm bells should be going off.

So, here I am, reading this crap and laughing my butt off. THEN, to top it all off, Timbo compares her actions with that of a PI. In order to be a private investigator, at least a good one, one must at least have a clue. Timbo doesn''t.

Timothy, you are likely not a slut, I don''t really know; yet, you do have all the symtpoms of bimboism. Here you are, an allegedly wronged woman confronting your alleged carouser on his own web site. Yoou purport to have evidence that would crush the man, but instead of presenting that to sources whom you think might care, you present your word to the fact that you have this material to those persons on his message board, many of whom likely support the man.

Personally, I have probably caught the radio program about a dozen times over the years. I prefer sports to other forms of talk radio, so I don''t tune in often. Besides, I don''t live in Corpus, so much of what is discussed concerns me very little. I rarely get a chance to watch much TV, so obviously, I am neither an EVW supporter or detractor. As far as this board, I find it entertaining for the most part, but my presence here is sporadically inconsistent, as others will attest.

I mention all that to ensure you that I neither worship EVW, nor do I loathe him. Yet, as I follow your posts, I can only wonder why you just don''t drop the bomb? If you have been so wronged as you say, why spread it here where you will have zero to little support? Why not just do what you have threatened?

An easy answer to those questions would be that you are untruthful; though, I doubt that is the reason. The real answer may lie in your own immaturity. You have said that you were not going to bother with this message board any longer, yet here you are. If those on this board are IDIOTS and the person who owns the board is a person you seem to despise, why worry what they are thinking of you? My guess is that you do not use your e-mails, photos, video and blue dress with DNA stains or whtever else you say you have because you want to scare Eric enough that he calls you, but not tick him off enough that he never will talk to you again.

I am always amazed when someone calls another to tell them they are no longer going to talk to them again. If I was going to stop talking to someone, the talking would just stop. There would be no warning. They would just never hear from me again. This has never come up, but I know I wouldn''t call them to tell them, ""I hate you and I will never call you again"".

In my mind, those who do so are looking for a response from the other person. Timbo, if that is your reason (and only you know that deep down--admitting it here is not important, just admit it to yourself), you probably need to seek professional help. otherwise, you will continue to live a life of broken promises and utter loneliness.

Good luck to you.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/19/2007 4:43:55 PM
ok lets see what i have here..hmmmm...

You say you know me better then i think? Why do you say that???? Come on be honest..can you do that? And why should it flatter me that you take the time to email me? Im sure you''re emailing or typing to at least 10 others at the same time..I know how Internet Men work :)

-----Original Message-----
From: ericvonwade@hotmail.com
To: aol.com
Sent: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: One Traffic Question ????

And yes I work but I take time durring my breaks to write to you. It should flatter you. :)

>From: aol.com
>To: ericvonwade@hotmail.com
>Subject: Re: One Traffic Question ????
>Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:58:02 -0400
>
>LOL..dont you ever work???? And you act like you know me..(AND YOU DONT) :) >so there!!!! HA HA And by the way are you saying you''re a little (as in) >ahemmmmm wow feel really bad for your girlfriend..LOL
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ericvonwade@hotmail.com
>To: aol.com
>Sent: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 3:48 PM
>Subject: Re: One Traffic Question ????
>
>
>Don''t act like you don''t like a little typical male every now and then. :)
>
> >From: aol.com
> >To: ericvonwade@hotmail.com
> >Subject: Re: One Traffic Question ????
> >Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:23:32 -0400
> >
> > LOL..TYPICAL male...what a bonehead..LOL
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: ericvonwade@hotmail.com
> >To: adamsilva1440keys@yahoo.com; aol.com; > >jilljacobs@rocketmail.com
> >Sent: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 2:51 PM
> >Subject: FW: One Traffic Question ????
> >
> >
> >
> > > Traffic Question
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Most men will get this right!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Q: You are driving along a narrow two lane road with a
> > >NO PASSING sign posted, and come upon a bicycle rider. Do you follow
> > >this slow-moving bicycle rider for the next 2 miles, or do you break
> > >the law and pass?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Which is the correct choice?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Scroll down...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > A: Why take unnecessary risks?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >________________________________
> > >
> > >

Date: 4/13/2007 2:56:39 P.M. Central Daylight Time
From: ericvonwade@hotmail.com
I''ll try to send you a picture durring one of my breaks. I''ll have to test
by porn star erection capabilities. :)

I''m kind of excited about this HONESTY thing getting me everywhere. I think
it would be fun to get together sometime. What do you think? :)

>To: ericvonwade@hotmail.com
>Subject: Re: One Traffic Question ????
>Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:28:34 EDT
>
>I didn''t know I had a choice...I thought this was just playful email
>banter..no???? Remember..HONESTY gets you everywhere :)
>

We''ll have to work on a ""when and where."" :) I am on the air for my radio
show from 2-6pm m-f and then I''m at the tv station from 8:30 to usually
10:50 or 11:15pm m-f. Don''t work weekends. Durring the week I''m kind of a
night Owl. To answer your question no, I was though. Are you?
361-438-xxxx

>To: ericvonwade@hotmail.com
>Subject: Re: One Traffic Question ????
>Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:38:34 EDT
>
>Hmmmm....like when and where? And I have one other question for you..and
>remember HONESTY..are you married? Perhaps we can exchange numbers as well,
>that
>might be a good start too, don''t ya think? :)
>

>http://www.aol.com.

_________________________________________________________________
Rates near 39yr lows! $430K Loan for $1,399/mo - Paying Too Much? Calculate
new payment
http://www.lowermybills.com/lre/index.jsp?sourceid=lmb-9632-18226&moid=7581

HIGHME
Posts: 7

Child Psychology?
5/20/2007 4:02:07 AM
I have nothing against a person for their sexual orientation however, when one rebukes others and acts like they are something they are not; there is a problem.

You guys be the Judge.

Why does this damaging thread remain as it will be a very damaging piece of evidence in court IF it is the problem.

It doesn''t make sense unless the intent is to (sacrifice) send a message of a less damaging nature in place of a truer more damaging one.

He wants you guys to believe Timothy because why?

And I hope I am wrong because I too once believed in EVW and
HIGHME
Posts: 7

Re: Child Psychology?
5/20/2007 4:15:57 AM
Another thing, EVW could have an email account at hotmail and maybe it is his primary account but the email address below is the one he has used in the past.

evwade@intcomm.net

How bout a subpoena on all email communications?

Hey thanks for the good idea.

No, not for here
CommonSense
Posts: 1149

Timothy.....
5/19/2007 10:21:10 PM
If you have a personal beef with Eric that is between you and him. This is not the place for your kind of high school antics. This is really none of our business.

It is funny how within 1 post you went from questioning my name here to ""spilling the beans"". I believe I said go ahead and give me a new name is you felt you knew me so well. The next thing I know, your posting this crap about Eric again. Obviously you cannot understand the difference between personal and public.

I also didn''t see anyone ""egging"" you on to produce the information, if its real, until after you started on your little soapbox.

As I stated earlier. Take it up with Eric and don''t do it here. His business is his business. You shouldn''t be trying to make it our business.

That is what separates the adults from the kids.
Cal
Posts: 1342

Re: Timothy.....
5/20/2007 7:27:23 AM
AHHHH YeSSSSS Nothing like a ""Return To Payton Place"" but this time it is here in BWBBTB.

Reminds me also of ""Harper Valley PTA"" but here we have no valleys.

Yes, those were the ""Days of Wine and Roses.""

Say,who started this mess anyway???

I think it is a :D :D :D :D

is Timothy a girl or gay~ or is Eric ?

2007-05-19T22:05:00.000-07:00

Original Message
CommonSense
Posts: 1149

Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/8/2007 7:37:41 PM
I posted this within another thread, but I thought I would give it it's own thread so y'all won't overlook it.

I had to type manually because it is a pdf document. I don't want to link to another website that Eric wouldn't approve of.(competitor)

Intergraph Case Number 07-04210125

At approximately 1:52 PM on April 21, 2007, I contacted the victim at 3315 S. Alameda (Doctor's Regional Emergency Room) in reference to a sexual assault report. When contacted, victim #1 had advised that she and suspect #1 (As of a month ago) were boyfriend and girlfriend. Victim added that suspect #1 had been in contact with her since the time of the break-up. Victim added that at approximately 2 am on April 21, 2007, suspect #1 had sent her a text message via her cell phone that he was outside of her apartment. Victim advised that she let suspect #1 into her apartment due to avoid waking up her child. Victim added that suspect #1 was intoxicated. Victim added that this led to him (suspect #1) touching and kissing each other which lated led to sexual intercourse against her will. The assault in question occured in her living room. Victim kept adding that she still loves suspect #1. Sexual assault exam requested was signed by reporting officer.

Case: 07-421125

Y'all can draw your own conclusions. In my opinion, there doesn't seem to be enough here to actually make charges. I'm waiting to see what the rape kit will reveal.

Collapse all posts in this thread
Author Replys
Republic69
Posts: 467

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/8/2007 8:42:47 PM
Did you not read the part about SEXUAL INTERCOURSE AGAINST HER WILL? Despite she says ""she still loves him"", you can love someone and still get raped by them. You can love your wife/girlfriend and she can love you back, but forcing someone into sex, is RAPE, and it does not matter if you love them or not.

If your wife says no to sex, but you still force yourself into her, that is rape, its domestic rape.
CommonSense
Posts: 1149

Here is a novel idea Republic.....
5/8/2007 9:36:33 PM
drop the attitude there spanky. I posted this for everyone to see the report and posted my own opinion. The report speaks for itself.

I''m glad you understand the concept of ""no means no"". That is a concept that most of us men learn at an early age.

Once again I will point out to you as I have for others. Let the investigation play out. The rape kit will hopefully fill in the blanks that the report is missing.

Lighten up man.
curtis rock
Posts: 1901

Click here to email curtis rock Talk to curtis rock on AOL Instant Messenger Talk to curtis rock on Yahoo! Messenger

The problem...
5/9/2007 12:14:50 AM
I just think the problem Is that he is engaged and allegedly having sex with another woman.

Secondly, shouldn''t the Chief of Police be doing things to remove people from the streets who are driving while intoxicated, or did he ride his bike to this woman''s house?

I personally like Bryan, I am a little disappointed. I don''t think he''s a rapist by any means, but I think he made some poor judgement. Just goes to show that everyone makes mistakes. I hope he comes back from vacation and continues doing what he''s been doing.
Cal
Posts: 1341

Re: The problem...
5/9/2007 7:38:15 AM
Just goes to show that everyone makes mistakes.

Even Melody Cooper? And she should Know better,but did it anyway. So saith the Judge.

Now some people are after her hide.
LONEWOLF
Posts: 924

Re: The problem...
5/9/2007 1:57:36 PM
Kinda funny dontcha think that you ""...don''t think he''s a rapist by any means"" but you take her unsubstantiated claim that he was drunk as gospel truth.
army_of_juan
Posts: 64

Click here to email army_of_juan

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 7:56:39 AM
If somebody rapes you,......

I am sorry,.......

but the love is gone.

Pure and simple she wanted to let the whole world know he used her.

Wham bam thank you mam.

That is all it amounted to and she wanted it to mean more.

I didnt, get over it.

Rape is vile!

You don''t love someone after they rape you.

She is desparate.
Republic69
Posts: 467

Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 11:35:11 AM
Army of Juan, you are in need of an internship at the Women''s Shelter.

Have you ever heard of Battered Woman Syndrome? Women can be beaten, raped, sodomized, thrown down a flight of stairs, humiliated, and she will still stay with her husband/lover/boyfriend as a result of psychologically been dependent on him as well as financially for her children.

In your mind, Chief Bryan Smith probably should have URINATED on her like the Annaville rapist, maybe then she would not seem so ""desperate""?!
army_of_juan
Posts: 64

Click here to email army_of_juan

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 10:16:42 PM
Know all about it. Those women dont call up the media and only file police reports when they are very angry (it takes the anger for them to even file). When they file they dont love the loser. After the begin to ""miss him"" then they think they ""love him"".

The girl is ate up with jealousy and this jealousy was used by the political expedient. They wanted to place the chief under the thumb. Women are the tool of power politics usually it works out more subtle and is held over the head for a favor in the future. You want to go after somebody who beats his spouse check out the divorces of some of our leading men.

You will see this was a political stunt.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 9:53:36 AM
She is desperate? Do you know how dumb that sounds? He went to her place why? hmmm obviously only he knows but im sure like most men that are engaged or in a relationship with their significant other its purely for SEX he wanted it..she didnt call him he TEXT her..and shes the desperate one? NO shes the smart one for bringing this out in the open and making him think now ""what the heck did i do""..its amazing when people do things wrong and AFTER the fact they want to know WHY are you doing this to me? WHY are you letting the public know this? SO no if it wasnt rape fine, if it was justice will hopefully be served..Chief Bryan Smith has issues, he was always at the Surf Club with his fiancee and even then HE had a roving eye on every little thing that passed by him..i think hes just really high on himself because of the position he holds..I have seen it with my own 2 eyes...Too many people in high positions in this community just need to realize that people are watching
Guido
Posts: 413

Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 2:14:17 PM
Unless there is a fairly copious amount of vaginal tearing indicating that the sex was most likely not consensual, this case is going to be a pretty big loser for the prosecution, regardless of whether a rape occurred or not.

First, there are only two witnesses to the alleged offense, the accuser and the accused. Second, any defense attorney worth his salt will point out that the suspect texted her that he was outside--a locked door. The victim will likely be grilled about why she just didn''t call police. Then, he will jump on the fact that she said she still loves him. By the end of her testimony, he will have the jury accepting the premise that she is a jilted woman trying to get her man back by anyway possible.

Is that the truth? We will likely never know the true answer to that. The only thing that is certain is that there is most likely a copious amount of reasonable doubt in this case.

If the alleged victim was raped, she will probably never find justice in this case. If she was not raped, Smith will most likely never clear his name, as the court of public opinion is not contricted by reasonable doubt requirements. The only winners will be the defense attorneys who will make a bundle on this case.

Is that the way it should be? No. Is that the way it is much of the time? Yes.
Cal
Posts: 1341

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 3:55:35 PM
The only winners will be the defense attorneys

Should this go to trial,I will be there in a packed courtroom listening very intently to testimony by all parties. Then I will write my answer on a piece of paper,give it to a friend to hold and make/take bets on the verdict of the jury.
LONEWOLF
Posts: 924

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 4:06:45 PM
This case will never see a courtroom.
Cal
Posts: 1341

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 8:21:31 PM
If the case never goes to court,then I won''t be able to make bets.

Oh well,life will go on with or without Chief Bryan Smith.
CommonSense
Posts: 1149

Here is the contradiction in her statement....
5/9/2007 4:25:01 PM
Victim added that this led to him (suspect #1) touching and kissing each other which later led to sexual intercourse against her will.

The end of the statement states that the sex was against her will. However, she seemed a willing participant up to that point. Unfortunately all this statement really shows is her word against his, and we still don''t know if any of this took place or not. Remember the Duke players?

Let the investigation play out.
Guido
Posts: 413

Re: Here is the contradiction in her statement....
5/9/2007 4:57:45 PM
The difference between this and the Duke case is that one of the accused could prove he was innocent.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Here is the contradiction in her statement....
5/9/2007 5:23:52 PM
Here''s the thing he should not have been there anyway..he is ENGAGED!!!!..it makes him look guilty no matter what..and it makes him look exactly what it is a drunk man wanting a booty call at 2AM and they always call on thier ex...awwww poor Bryan Smith..you made yourself look like an ass regardless of the outcome...Next time think with your OTHER HEAD!
CommonSense
Posts: 1149

Food for thought Timothy....
5/9/2007 5:42:51 PM
Did this alleged sexual encounter occur that day? We still don''t know. That is when the report was filed but so far that is the only thing indicating that something happened that day if it did.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Food for thought Timothy....
5/9/2007 6:41:59 PM
The truth always comes out :)
Cal
Posts: 1341

Re: Re: Food for thought Timothy....
5/9/2007 8:34:05 PM
Since when!!!! :D :D :D

With todays lawyers the truth will never come out!!!
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Re: Food for thought Timothy....
5/10/2007 7:30:16 AM
If the truth doesnt come out it wont be because of the attorneys,,it will be simply because of the position Bryan Smith holds in this city, Corpus Christis SUPPOSIBLY Finest are good for this prancing around with their badges and their status and KNOWING that even if the Tex Rangers look into this MOST cases are thrown out simply cause CC Finest never seem to do any wrong...they can speed and NO BIGGIE, shit when i see that i catch right up next to them showing them that if you can do it SO can I..they are little boys with a toy on their side and a toy in their pants ,,and 99.5% know it.. whats good for the goose is good for the gander
Guido
Posts: 413

Re: Re: Re: Re: Food for thought Timothy....
5/10/2007 2:43:20 PM
The difference is, if Bryan Smith was not in his position, this would not be headline news. If he was a welder''s helper, she probably would not have had anything to do with him in the first place. Losing a work-a-day guy would be no biggie and she would find another, easy enough.

Even the report, where she states they were kissing and touching EACH OTHER, indicates that she welcomed him. Yes, Bryan Smith is a dumbass and a lech for making the booty call, but the alleged victim opened the door. She had to know why he was there and perhaps even was glad he was there.

My guess is that she got ticked off when he went back to business as usual. The only person with no fault in this matter is the fiancee'', though I have no idea why she went before the cameras with Smith when the announcement was made. She should have given him his walking papers well before that time.

Yeah, many men are dogs, but many women are also to blame. If a man wants to stray, he doesn''t have to look far to find a skank to stray with.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Food for thought Timothy....
5/10/2007 4:10:59 PM
You know not all women go after men that hold higher positions..some men tend to SEEK women that have no clue WHOM they are, its a POWER thing..shoot i''d rather have a down to earth guy that isnt in the publics eye that way IF and WHEN he were to screw up you don''t look like the idiot that stands with him on his side infront of the media..a woman like that needs to check herself at the door...i''d be SEE YA LATER BABE..Id rather be someones priority as opposed to their option..and thats exactly what he did to both women they were both OPTIONS...i''d be putting that engagement ring on ebay to the highest bidder ..LOL
bigo
Posts: 958

Re: Re: Re: Re: Food for thought Timothy....
5/18/2007 9:42:07 PM
My pappy always said there''s nothing worse that a pissed off woman. I wonder if she''s any kin to the Chiefs ex??

Oh well, I don''t foresee her posting much longer. And good luck getting those personal emails published in the CCCT''s.
army_of_juan
Posts: 64

Click here to email army_of_juan

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 10:25:21 PM
I agree with you Timothy except she was desparate. Bryan has a roving eye and all the other Quorum Club Surf Club etc etc etc

But this one was a pre meditated booty call.

I bet there is video as well but it will tell the real story.

She was losing him.

I apologize if it disagrees with you.
nuecescountyuprisin
Posts: 11

Click here to email nuecescountyuprisin Talk to nuecescountyuprisin on AOL Instant Messenger

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/15/2007 1:36:09 PM
smith was drunk, but he wasn''t drinking his pimp juice. old dude slipped.
booty calls are not hard to pull off, engaged or not.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/15/2007 2:26:40 PM
Slipped? Hmmm you mean CCPD doesn''t supply those devices that you wear around your neck so when you SLIP you can press it and someone will be there to help you get up? I can buy him some Pimp Juice on Ebay that way next time he WONT SLIP..LOL

20 Cans PIMPJUICE ENERGY DRINK by NELLY NEW SIZE

US $32.00

curmudgeon
Posts: 4780

Click here to email curmudgeon

He was just tryin'' . . .
5/15/2007 3:08:03 PM
. . . out that stuff that promises instant male enhancement (I think we just used to refer to this as ""wood"") that is advertised on KEYS.
Cal
Posts: 1341

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/15/2007 3:33:47 PM
Heard at morning coffee break this morning he is getting 6mos vacation as that is how long The Rangers are going to take for the investigation.

I smells da rat!!!
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/15/2007 5:18:23 PM
Hmmm just watched the news yup 6 more months and he still states that all sex was CONSENSUAL..i hope all the embarrasment was worth it..he should have bought a FLESHLIGHT if he needed to get off that bad
CommonSense
Posts: 1149

I would hate to be a criminal with......
5/15/2007 4:13:53 PM
some of you on the jury. Y''all have already convicted him before the investigation is over. If he is guilty, then he needs to be punished. If he is innocent, then he should be able to continue on with his work.

Keep in mind people...

Everything at this point is her word against his. Hard to convict on that. They need to be able to find physical evidence to support her case. That is why I keep stating that it will be interesting to see what the rape kit reveals. Also remember, that the rape kit can show she had sex, but it may not tell with who if there is no DNA. I hate to keep bringing this up, but remember the Duke case?
Cal
Posts: 1341

Re: I would hate to be a criminal with......
5/15/2007 5:30:13 PM
Don''t get us wrong. We agree with you. We are just wondering why six months for the rape kit results.

If I were in that position and I had nothing to hide,I would be screeming bloody murder for a poly test.

Even if he did have consenual sex with why not just come out and say so. Guess he could want his cake and eat it also.

I will not say he is guilty nor will I say he is innocent as I was not there and I do not know the facts of the investigation. I can and as many others can only form an opinion based on what is put out i9n the media. After the job No. 3 in ratings did on the pastor in Portland.I will form an opinion on the other two,
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: I would hate to be a criminal with......
5/15/2007 6:04:04 PM
Hmmm enough evidence to go infront of the Grand Jury...impressive...cant wait May 25th
CommonSense
Posts: 1149

The Mayor called the head of DPS....
5/15/2007 9:11:21 PM
and requested that the investigation be completed sooner. Apparently the lab that will do the testing on the rape kit is understaffed and stated it would take 6 months to complete. However, a phone call to the lab has them completing it in 2-3 months.

Another thing to check is the phone record. They can check to see if the text message was sent at the time she indicates in the report. They may not be able to determine the message.
Cal
Posts: 1341

Re: The Mayor called the head of DPS....
5/16/2007 8:33:40 AM
Wonder who hit Garrett on the head to wake him up and make the phone call?

Maybe Gibbs bopped him!! :) :) :)

Well anyway,he did something right.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: The Mayor called the head of DPS....
5/16/2007 9:27:34 AM
First off they could have requested to see her cell phone it would show a text message from him and the time sent they dont actually need to pull records, if she was smart she would have locked the message as evidence
Guido
Posts: 413

Re: Re: Re: The Mayor called the head of DPS....
5/17/2007 7:58:54 PM
First of all, six months WAS fast action from the DPS lab. Many cases take up to a year, depending upon the agency. Usually, you just get in line with all the other sex crimes. In order for this woman''s test to move up, obviously someone''s wait, perhaps that 5 year-old girl raped by an uncle, will be longer now.

Sadly, that wait will be for naught, as the defense already seems to be stipulating that sex occured. DNA will not show anything more than who made a deposit, not how forcefully said deposit was placed. There are no ""rape sperms"". There are no semen dressed as pirates boarding the undefended vagina vessel.

In other words, the DNA is actually useless in this case. Henry Garrett grandstanded by calling in a favor, and then could only cut the wait by about 1/2 to 2/3. I suppose he doesn''t pull as much weight as he thought.

Basically, the D.A. will go with her word against his to the Grand Jury. The defense will have no chance to rebut any testimony or offer their own side beyond what is allowed by the prosecution. However, once an indictment is handed down (if it happens), then the defense can go to work.

If a D.A. really wants to indict someone, it will happen. No amount of innocence will prevent it. Grand Juries can be stacked and they can also be hoodwinked. Chucky is pretty good at both.
winston
Posts: 103

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 12:21:14 AM
I believe we had a certified CSI Lab @ CCPD but Skip Noe refused to Recertify it when Alvarez was running for Sheriff.

So we have no lab because of this clown.

Blame him for the next six months.

BTW he voted for a raise for himself and the Waters Group.

What a guy
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 8:27:07 AM
If the people in this city havent noticed we have NOTHING in this town..why? because of ALL the clowns on city council..all we have is the stupid beach,,,this isnt a real city..no amusements parks for our kids, no places like the Japanese Tea garden in SA..our kids have nothing...and why? Because of the close minded people, they dont want change in this city..WAKE UP people its like stagnate water..pretty disgusting..our streets are so ripped up and all they continue doing is putting a band-aid on the situation, no wonder when our kids graduate and move away, whats here to offer them? NOTHING!
CommonSense
Posts: 1149

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 9:02:55 AM
If it''s so bad here Timothy, why don''t you move. Find a place that is more to your liking. Personally, I can''t see living somewhere that I don''t like.
bigo
Posts: 958

Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 9:03:37 AM
Even if there were a Lab in CC, it wouldn''t be wise to do the work on a high profile case like this locally. There would be too much room for claims of ""fixing"" the results.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 11:18:01 AM
I plan on moving this coming year..im in the process of informing the news stations and writing into the paper about little scandals first about a few people in this city, like some on city council that i know personally..ummm also a local news anchor about his infidelity along with all the proof that i have in my posession..just to make people squirm first...its kinda fun to see people squirm when they get themselves in hot water :) So Commonsense..poor choice of name for you..becareful who you piss off.
Cal
Posts: 1341

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 11:47:44 AM
Timothy:

""Payton Place"" was long ago and in a far distant land. We live here in BWBBTB and do not want to change our lifestyle.

We get our ""Soap Operas"" on local TV. Granted they are fiction,but alas,we have our real life dramas here in BWBBTB and proud of out limited exposure.

An expose would bring on many heart attacks and we could loose politicians.
Sure wish you had something on Ted Kennedy,Nancy Peloci and the rest of
The Cereal State."" :D :D Even I could be prone to heart attacks.
CommonSense
Posts: 1149

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 12:17:18 PM
So Commonsense..poor choice of name for you..becareful who you piss off.

Since you seem to know me so well, what should my name be? I will leave it up to the ones here that have met me to decide if it fits or not. Have fun with this as I will not be taking it personally.

As far as your scandals, I would suggest a little maturity on your part. Most of us left high school many years ago and don''t intend on looking back. If you are doing it to make people squirm, that shows a lack of character on your part.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 12:30:07 PM
I plan on showing maturity..i will no longer spend my time posting on here..this site is more like high school..i have stated nothing but FACTS..and frankly i could care less what happens to those peoples lives that CHOSE to screw around. When the media gets all the emails that transpired along with the short video clip of the one you worship on here showing me his member in between his radio segments..LOL..., you make your bed..lay in it..he cheated in the past and this is his second time..good luck on your upcomming renewal on your co-anchor position in June
Guido
Posts: 413

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 1:39:00 PM
(Timothty)...like some on city council that i know personally..ummm also a local news anchor about his infidelity along with all the proof that i have in my posession..just to make people squirm first...

Dang girl! Just how many different hoohaas have you seen? Is that a hobby of yours, or do they just walk up and drop their pants? Geez, it would seem that you have an affinity for this sort of thing, as you have so much evidence. Pity the poor soul who ever confides in you.
nuecescountyuprisin
Posts: 11

Click here to email nuecescountyuprisin Talk to nuecescountyuprisin on AOL Instant Messenger

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 5:50:38 PM
timothy''s a girl?
curmudgeon
Posts: 4780

Click here to email curmudgeon

I think . . .
5/18/2007 8:12:19 PM
. . . slut would be more appropriate.
nuecescountyuprisin
Posts: 11

Click here to email nuecescountyuprisin Talk to nuecescountyuprisin on AOL Instant Messenger

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 8:30:42 PM
BWBBTB? wtf
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 9:06:27 PM
Why am i considered a SLUT when Eric sought me out knowingly he was married..i had NO CLUE who in the heck he was...i have emails to PROVE i asked him over and over if he was married and to be honest and he said he wasnt ALSO he said and i quote "" i should be flattered that hes emailing me"" i''m thinking WHY? #1 im far from a slut and #2 why is it when a MAN does something wrong a woman should shut her mouth well guess what it doesn''t work that way...oh and Eric i was going to keep the rest of everything to myself ( and you know what i mean) but its these IDIOTS that are going to let me spill it all..you can thank them for egging me on!
curmudgeon
Posts: 4780

Click here to email curmudgeon

You''ll have to excuse me . . .
5/18/2007 9:19:46 PM
. . . I thought someone who was screwin'' guys indiscriminately was a slut. Guys think with their pecker.
Guido
Posts: 413

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 9:30:16 PM
Hmm, it is funny that nothing is ever Timothy''s fault. It is the fault of the ""IDIOTS"" that Timbo is going to ""spill"" the beans. Funny how that less than nine hours ago she was going to stop wasting her time posting here. Yet, here she is. I suppose that is our fault, as well.

As far as spilling the beans, who cares beyond you and your accused? This site is probably only regulary perused by a handful of people, most of whom either support EVW or, like me, wouldn''t give a rat''s a$$ about what he does or with whom he does it.

In other words, you want to get into an intelligent discussion about issues of the day, you are welcome to it. If you want to spill your guts about how you were robbed of your chastity, start up your own web page. It has been done before.

The first post or two, it was a diversion. Now, it is just pathetic. If you have those e-mails and whatever photos, send them off to whomever. I seriously doubt that anyone will care. Sure, it might cause a giggle around a watercooler or two on an otherwise achingly dull Monday morning, but it will be forgotten by lunch time.

winston
Posts: 103

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/19/2007 12:37:21 AM
Even if their lab was certified which it isn''t, Mr.Smith has already pretty much admitted his DNA would be there, since he admitted the sex was consensual.

As for Timothy, I am totally interested in what she has to say.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/19/2007 9:05:25 AM
Thank you Winston..and again the only way i know these couple of men that i have stated on here is because THEY approached me..i dont need to go out and seek men, i could care less what you do for a living and what your status is in this community, but when lies start to surface damn right i will speak up..mess with fire and you will get burned so if you''d like i can offer you all and any copies of these emails along with the short video clip of what some people call him the poor accused. Eric you''d fit right in with alot of politicians..you sit there with that fake smug smile, when you cheat and think no one will find out..remember when i told you people saw us together and told me you were married, thought i was too stupid to check into it...i love seeking out cheating spouses, yours was too easy. Isnt there a morality clause in your contract at Channel 10? So you said anyway..unless that was a lie too, shoot i dont know how people can take your word for anything when every other word out of your mouth is a lie. I should have known better when the only place you could meet me at was the lease in Sinton after 11PM that Sunday, and also when you said you couldnt foot the bill for a hotel and you dont carry cash so you asked me to pay for it..LOL what a joke i am.. i''m sure you laughed about it all the time...i wondered why i never could go to your house. I know now, and so does everyone else :)
LONEWOLF
Posts: 924

LISTEN UP!
5/19/2007 12:58:08 PM
You''re WAY out of line punk -- knock it off!
bigo
Posts: 958

Re: LISTEN UP!
5/19/2007 1:03:20 PM
Timbo..

You love seeking out cheating spouses and you talk about morality. What am I missing here??????
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: LISTEN UP!
5/19/2007 1:10:35 PM
PUNK? Hmmmm good choice of words..but WRONGGGGGGG again, im far from a PUNK..and why is it making your skin crawl? Is it affecting you that i''m speaking the TRUTH...see thats that thing here...it''s ALL TRUTH every bit of it..tsk tsk...it''s nice when to know i have PROOF..if i was a private investigator i would just be doing my job..no? I think it''s so humorous though that men get themselves in these predicaments..im just the messenger :) LOL..it will teach a man next time before cheating though WONT IT!
curtis rock
Posts: 1901

Click here to email curtis rock Talk to curtis rock on AOL Instant Messenger Talk to curtis rock on Yahoo! Messenger

You may not be a punk...
5/19/2007 4:30:56 PM
But I think you''re a bitch. I hope Eric removes your bullshit posts.
Guido
Posts: 413

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/19/2007 4:16:23 PM
I am in my late forties. In all my years, I have not once had a woman, who I was involved with, ask if I was married. If you have to think of asking the question, alarm bells should be going off.

So, here I am, reading this crap and laughing my butt off. THEN, to top it all off, Timbo compares her actions with that of a PI. In order to be a private investigator, at least a good one, one must at least have a clue. Timbo doesn''t.

Timothy, you are likely not a slut, I don''t really know; yet, you do have all the symtpoms of bimboism. Here you are, an allegedly wronged woman confronting your alleged carouser on his own web site. Yoou purport to have evidence that would crush the man, but instead of presenting that to sources whom you think might care, you present your word to the fact that you have this material to those persons on his message board, many of whom likely support the man.

Personally, I have probably caught the radio program about a dozen times over the years. I prefer sports to other forms of talk radio, so I don''t tune in often. Besides, I don''t live in Corpus, so much of what is discussed concerns me very little. I rarely get a chance to watch much TV, so obviously, I am neither an EVW supporter or detractor. As far as this board, I find it entertaining for the most part, but my presence here is sporadically inconsistent, as others will attest.

I mention all that to ensure you that I neither worship EVW, nor do I loathe him. Yet, as I follow your posts, I can only wonder why you just don''t drop the bomb? If you have been so wronged as you say, why spread it here where you will have zero to little support? Why not just do what you have threatened?

An easy answer to those questions would be that you are untruthful; though, I doubt that is the reason. The real answer may lie in your own immaturity. You have said that you were not going to bother with this message board any longer, yet here you are. If those on this board are IDIOTS and the person who owns the board is a person you seem to despise, why worry what they are thinking of you? My guess is that you do not use your e-mails, photos, video and blue dress with DNA stains or whtever else you say you have because you want to scare Eric enough that he calls you, but not tick him off enough that he never will talk to you again.

I am always amazed when someone calls another to tell them they are no longer going to talk to them again. If I was going to stop talking to someone, the talking would just stop. There would be no warning. They would just never hear from me again. This has never come up, but I know I wouldn''t call them to tell them, ""I hate you and I will never call you again"".

In my mind, those who do so are looking for a response from the other person. Timbo, if that is your reason (and only you know that deep down--admitting it here is not important, just admit it to yourself), you probably need to seek professional help. otherwise, you will continue to live a life of broken promises and utter loneliness.

Good luck to you.
Timothy
Posts: 24

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/19/2007 4:43:55 PM
ok lets see what i have here..hmmmm...

You say you know me better then i think? Why do you say that???? Come on be honest..can you do that? And why should it flatter me that you take the time to email me? Im sure you''re emailing or typing to at least 10 others at the same time..I know how Internet Men work :)

-----Original Message-----
From: ericvonwade@hotmail.com
To: aol.com
Sent: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 5:30 PM
Subject: Re: One Traffic Question ????

And yes I work but I take time durring my breaks to write to you. It should flatter you. :)

>From: aol.com
>To: ericvonwade@hotmail.com
>Subject: Re: One Traffic Question ????
>Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:58:02 -0400
>
>LOL..dont you ever work???? And you act like you know me..(AND YOU DONT) :) >so there!!!! HA HA And by the way are you saying you''re a little (as in) >ahemmmmm wow feel really bad for your girlfriend..LOL
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ericvonwade@hotmail.com
>To: aol.com
>Sent: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 3:48 PM
>Subject: Re: One Traffic Question ????
>
>
>Don''t act like you don''t like a little typical male every now and then. :)
>
> >From: aol.com
> >To: ericvonwade@hotmail.com
> >Subject: Re: One Traffic Question ????
> >Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 16:23:32 -0400
> >
> > LOL..TYPICAL male...what a bonehead..LOL
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: ericvonwade@hotmail.com
> >To: adamsilva1440keys@yahoo.com; aol.com; > >jilljacobs@rocketmail.com
> >Sent: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 2:51 PM
> >Subject: FW: One Traffic Question ????
> >
> >
> >
> > > Traffic Question
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Most men will get this right!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Q: You are driving along a narrow two lane road with a
> > >NO PASSING sign posted, and come upon a bicycle rider. Do you follow
> > >this slow-moving bicycle rider for the next 2 miles, or do you break
> > >the law and pass?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Which is the correct choice?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Scroll down...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > A: Why take unnecessary risks?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >________________________________
> > >
> > >

Date: 4/13/2007 2:56:39 P.M. Central Daylight Time
From: ericvonwade@hotmail.com
I''ll try to send you a picture durring one of my breaks. I''ll have to test
by porn star erection capabilities. :)

I''m kind of excited about this HONESTY thing getting me everywhere. I think
it would be fun to get together sometime. What do you think? :)

>To: ericvonwade@hotmail.com
>Subject: Re: One Traffic Question ????
>Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:28:34 EDT
>
>I didn''t know I had a choice...I thought this was just playful email
>banter..no???? Remember..HONESTY gets you everywhere :)
>

We''ll have to work on a ""when and where."" :) I am on the air for my radio
show from 2-6pm m-f and then I''m at the tv station from 8:30 to usually
10:50 or 11:15pm m-f. Don''t work weekends. Durring the week I''m kind of a
night Owl. To answer your question no, I was though. Are you?
361-438-xxxx

>To: ericvonwade@hotmail.com
>Subject: Re: One Traffic Question ????
>Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:38:34 EDT
>
>Hmmmm....like when and where? And I have one other question for you..and
>remember HONESTY..are you married? Perhaps we can exchange numbers as well,
>that
>might be a good start too, don''t ya think? :)
>

>http://www.aol.com.

_________________________________________________________________
Rates near 39yr lows! $430K Loan for $1,399/mo - Paying Too Much? Calculate
new payment
http://www.lowermybills.com/lre/index.jsp?sourceid=lmb-9632-18226&moid=7581

CommonSense
Posts: 1149

Timothy..... Your are currently viewing this message
5/19/2007 10:21:10 PM
If you have a personal beef with Eric that is between you and him. This is not the place for your kind of high school antics. This is really none of our business.

It is funny how within 1 post you went from questioning my name here to ""spilling the beans"". I believe I said go ahead and give me a new name is you felt you knew me so well. The next thing I know, your posting this crap about Eric again. Obviously you cannot understand the difference between personal and public.

I also didn''t see anyone ""egging"" you on to produce the information, if its real, until after you started on your little soapbox.

As I stated earlier. Take it up with Eric and don''t do it here. His business is his business. You shouldn''t be trying to make it our business.

That is what separates the adults from the kids.

Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith

2007-05-18T21:09:00.000-07:00

CommonSense
Posts: 1148

Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith Your are currently viewing this message
5/8/2007 7:37:41 PM
I posted this within another thread, but I thought I would give it it's own thread so y'all won't overlook it.

I had to type manually because it is a pdf document. I don't want to link to another website that Eric wouldn't approve of.(competitor)

Intergraph Case Number 07-04210125

At approximately 1:52 PM on April 21, 2007, I contacted the victim at 3315 S. Alameda (Doctor's Regional Emergency Room) in reference to a sexual assault report. When contacted, victim #1 had advised that she and suspect #1 (As of a month ago) were boyfriend and girlfriend. Victim added that suspect #1 had been in contact with her since the time of the break-up. Victim added that at approximately 2 am on April 21, 2007, suspect #1 had sent her a text message via her cell phone that he was outside of her apartment. Victim advised that she let suspect #1 into her apartment due to avoid waking up her child. Victim added that suspect #1 was intoxicated. Victim added that this led to him (suspect #1) touching and kissing each other which lated led to sexual intercourse against her will. The assault in question occured in her living room. Victim kept adding that she still loves suspect #1. Sexual assault exam requested was signed by reporting officer.

Case: 07-421125

Y'all can draw your own conclusions. In my opinion, there doesn't seem to be enough here to actually make charges. I'm waiting to see what the rape kit will reveal.

Collapse all posts in this thread
Author Replys
Republic69
Posts: 467

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/8/2007 8:42:47 PM
Did you not read the part about SEXUAL INTERCOURSE AGAINST HER WILL? Despite she says ""she still loves him"", you can love someone and still get raped by them. You can love your wife/girlfriend and she can love you back, but forcing someone into sex, is RAPE, and it does not matter if you love them or not.

If your wife says no to sex, but you still force yourself into her, that is rape, its domestic rape.
CommonSense
Posts: 1148

Here is a novel idea Republic.....
5/8/2007 9:36:33 PM
drop the attitude there spanky. I posted this for everyone to see the report and posted my own opinion. The report speaks for itself.

I''m glad you understand the concept of ""no means no"". That is a concept that most of us men learn at an early age.

Once again I will point out to you as I have for others. Let the investigation play out. The rape kit will hopefully fill in the blanks that the report is missing.

Lighten up man.
curtis rock
Posts: 1898

Click here to email curtis rock Talk to curtis rock on AOL Instant Messenger Talk to curtis rock on Yahoo! Messenger

The problem...
5/9/2007 12:14:50 AM
I just think the problem Is that he is engaged and allegedly having sex with another woman.

Secondly, shouldn''t the Chief of Police be doing things to remove people from the streets who are driving while intoxicated, or did he ride his bike to this woman''s house?

I personally like Bryan, I am a little disappointed. I don''t think he''s a rapist by any means, but I think he made some poor judgement. Just goes to show that everyone makes mistakes. I hope he comes back from vacation and continues doing what he''s been doing.
Cal
Posts: 1340

Re: The problem...
5/9/2007 7:38:15 AM
Just goes to show that everyone makes mistakes.

Even Melody Cooper? And she should Know better,but did it anyway. So saith the Judge.

Now some people are after her hide.
LONEWOLF
Posts: 922

Re: The problem...
5/9/2007 1:57:36 PM
Kinda funny dontcha think that you ""...don''t think he''s a rapist by any means"" but you take her unsubstantiated claim that he was drunk as gospel truth.
army_of_juan
Posts: 64

Click here to email army_of_juan

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 7:56:39 AM
If somebody rapes you,......

I am sorry,.......

but the love is gone.

Pure and simple she wanted to let the whole world know he used her.

Wham bam thank you mam.

That is all it amounted to and she wanted it to mean more.

I didnt, get over it.

Rape is vile!

You don''t love someone after they rape you.

She is desparate.
Republic69
Posts: 467

Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 11:35:11 AM
Army of Juan, you are in need of an internship at the Women''s Shelter.

Have you ever heard of Battered Woman Syndrome? Women can be beaten, raped, sodomized, thrown down a flight of stairs, humiliated, and she will still stay with her husband/lover/boyfriend as a result of psychologically been dependent on him as well as financially for her children.

In your mind, Chief Bryan Smith probably should have URINATED on her like the Annaville rapist, maybe then she would not seem so ""desperate""?!
army_of_juan
Posts: 64

Click here to email army_of_juan

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 10:16:42 PM
Know all about it. Those women dont call up the media and only file police reports when they are very angry (it takes the anger for them to even file). When they file they dont love the loser. After the begin to ""miss him"" then they think they ""love him"".

The girl is ate up with jealousy and this jealousy was used by the political expedient. They wanted to place the chief under the thumb. Women are the tool of power politics usually it works out more subtle and is held over the head for a favor in the future. You want to go after somebody who beats his spouse check out the divorces of some of our leading men.

You will see this was a political stunt.
Timothy
Posts: 21

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 9:53:36 AM
She is desperate? Do you know how dumb that sounds? He went to her place why? hmmm obviously only he knows but im sure like most men that are engaged or in a relationship with their significant other its purely for SEX he wanted it..she didnt call him he TEXT her..and shes the desperate one? NO shes the smart one for bringing this out in the open and making him think now ""what the heck did i do""..its amazing when people do things wrong and AFTER the fact they want to know WHY are you doing this to me? WHY are you letting the public know this? SO no if it wasnt rape fine, if it was justice will hopefully be served..Chief Bryan Smith has issues, he was always at the Surf Club with his fiancee and even then HE had a roving eye on every little thing that passed by him..i think hes just really high on himself because of the position he holds..I have seen it with my own 2 eyes...Too many people in high positions in this community just need to realize that people are watching
Guido
Posts: 410

Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 2:14:17 PM
Unless there is a fairly copious amount of vaginal tearing indicating that the sex was most likely not consensual, this case is going to be a pretty big loser for the prosecution, regardless of whether a rape occurred or not.

First, there are only two witnesses to the alleged offense, the accuser and the accused. Second, any defense attorney worth his salt will point out that the suspect texted her that he was outside--a locked door. The victim will likely be grilled about why she just didn''t call police. Then, he will jump on the fact that she said she still loves him. By the end of her testimony, he will have the jury accepting the premise that she is a jilted woman trying to get her man back by anyway possible.

Is that the truth? We will likely never know the true answer to that. The only thing that is certain is that there is most likely a copious amount of reasonable doubt in this case.

If the alleged victim was raped, she will probably never find justice in this case. If she was not raped, Smith will most likely never clear his name, as the court of public opinion is not contricted by reasonable doubt requirements. The only winners will be the defense attorneys who will make a bundle on this case.

Is that the way it should be? No. Is that the way it is much of the time? Yes.
Cal
Posts: 1340

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 3:55:35 PM
The only winners will be the defense attorneys

Should this go to trial,I will be there in a packed courtroom listening very intently to testimony by all parties. Then I will write my answer on a piece of paper,give it to a friend to hold and make/take bets on the verdict of the jury.
LONEWOLF
Posts: 922

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 4:06:45 PM
This case will never see a courtroom.
Cal
Posts: 1340

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 8:21:31 PM
If the case never goes to court,then I won''t be able to make bets.

Oh well,life will go on with or without Chief Bryan Smith.
CommonSense
Posts: 1148

Here is the contradiction in her statement....
5/9/2007 4:25:01 PM
Victim added that this led to him (suspect #1) touching and kissing each other which later led to sexual intercourse against her will.

The end of the statement states that the sex was against her will. However, she seemed a willing participant up to that point. Unfortunately all this statement really shows is her word against his, and we still don''t know if any of this took place or not. Remember the Duke players?

Let the investigation play out.
Guido
Posts: 410

Re: Here is the contradiction in her statement....
5/9/2007 4:57:45 PM
The difference between this and the Duke case is that one of the accused could prove he was innocent.
Timothy
Posts: 21

Re: Re: Here is the contradiction in her statement....
5/9/2007 5:23:52 PM
Here''s the thing he should not have been there anyway..he is ENGAGED!!!!..it makes him look guilty no matter what..and it makes him look exactly what it is a drunk man wanting a booty call at 2AM and they always call on thier ex...awwww poor Bryan Smith..you made yourself look like an ass regardless of the outcome...Next time think with your OTHER HEAD!
CommonSense
Posts: 1148

Food for thought Timothy....
5/9/2007 5:42:51 PM
Did this alleged sexual encounter occur that day? We still don''t know. That is when the report was filed but so far that is the only thing indicating that something happened that day if it did.
Timothy
Posts: 21

Re: Food for thought Timothy....
5/9/2007 6:41:59 PM
The truth always comes out :)
Cal
Posts: 1340

Re: Re: Food for thought Timothy....
5/9/2007 8:34:05 PM
Since when!!!! :D :D :D

With todays lawyers the truth will never come out!!!
Timothy
Posts: 21

Re: Re: Re: Food for thought Timothy....
5/10/2007 7:30:16 AM
If the truth doesnt come out it wont be because of the attorneys,,it will be simply because of the position Bryan Smith holds in this city, Corpus Christis SUPPOSIBLY Finest are good for this prancing around with their badges and their status and KNOWING that even if the Tex Rangers look into this MOST cases are thrown out simply cause CC Finest never seem to do any wrong...they can speed and NO BIGGIE, shit when i see that i catch right up next to them showing them that if you can do it SO can I..they are little boys with a toy on their side and a toy in their pants ,,and 99.5% know it.. whats good for the goose is good for the gander
Guido
Posts: 410

Re: Re: Re: Re: Food for thought Timothy....
5/10/2007 2:43:20 PM
The difference is, if Bryan Smith was not in his position, this would not be headline news. If he was a welder''s helper, she probably would not have had anything to do with him in the first place. Losing a work-a-day guy would be no biggie and she would find another, easy enough.

Even the report, where she states they were kissing and touching EACH OTHER, indicates that she welcomed him. Yes, Bryan Smith is a dumbass and a lech for making the booty call, but the alleged victim opened the door. She had to know why he was there and perhaps even was glad he was there.

My guess is that she got ticked off when he went back to business as usual. The only person with no fault in this matter is the fiancee'', though I have no idea why she went before the cameras with Smith when the announcement was made. She should have given him his walking papers well before that time.

Yeah, many men are dogs, but many women are also to blame. If a man wants to stray, he doesn''t have to look far to find a skank to stray with.
Timothy
Posts: 21

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Food for thought Timothy....
5/10/2007 4:10:59 PM
You know not all women go after men that hold higher positions..some men tend to SEEK women that have no clue WHOM they are, its a POWER thing..shoot i''d rather have a down to earth guy that isnt in the publics eye that way IF and WHEN he were to screw up you don''t look like the idiot that stands with him on his side infront of the media..a woman like that needs to check herself at the door...i''d be SEE YA LATER BABE..Id rather be someones priority as opposed to their option..and thats exactly what he did to both women they were both OPTIONS...i''d be putting that engagement ring on ebay to the highest bidder ..LOL
bigo
Posts: 954

Re: Re: Re: Re: Food for thought Timothy....
5/18/2007 9:42:07 PM
My pappy always said there''s nothing worse that a pissed off woman. I wonder if she''s any kin to the Chiefs ex??

Oh well, I don''t foresee her posting much longer. And good luck getting those personal emails published in the CCCT''s.
army_of_juan
Posts: 64

Click here to email army_of_juan

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/9/2007 10:25:21 PM
I agree with you Timothy except she was desparate. Bryan has a roving eye and all the other Quorum Club Surf Club etc etc etc

But this one was a pre meditated booty call.

I bet there is video as well but it will tell the real story.

She was losing him.

I apologize if it disagrees with you.
nuecescountyuprisin
Posts: 11

Click here to email nuecescountyuprisin Talk to nuecescountyuprisin on AOL Instant Messenger

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/15/2007 1:36:09 PM
smith was drunk, but he wasn''t drinking his pimp juice. old dude slipped.
booty calls are not hard to pull off, engaged or not.
Timothy
Posts: 21

Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/15/2007 2:26:40 PM
Slipped? Hmmm you mean CCPD doesn''t supply those devices that you wear around your neck so when you SLIP you can press it and someone will be there to help you get up? I can buy him some Pimp Juice on Ebay that way next time he WONT SLIP..LOL

20 Cans PIMPJUICE ENERGY DRINK by NELLY NEW SIZE

US $32.00

curmudgeon
Posts: 4773

Click here to email curmudgeon

He was just tryin'' . . .
5/15/2007 3:08:03 PM
. . . out that stuff that promises instant male enhancement (I think we just used to refer to this as ""wood"") that is advertised on KEYS.
Cal
Posts: 1340

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/15/2007 3:33:47 PM
Heard at morning coffee break this morning he is getting 6mos vacation as that is how long The Rangers are going to take for the investigation.

I smells da rat!!!
Timothy
Posts: 21

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/15/2007 5:18:23 PM
Hmmm just watched the news yup 6 more months and he still states that all sex was CONSENSUAL..i hope all the embarrasment was worth it..he should have bought a FLESHLIGHT if he needed to get off that bad
CommonSense
Posts: 1148

I would hate to be a criminal with......
5/15/2007 4:13:53 PM
some of you on the jury. Y''all have already convicted him before the investigation is over. If he is guilty, then he needs to be punished. If he is innocent, then he should be able to continue on with his work.

Keep in mind people...

Everything at this point is her word against his. Hard to convict on that. They need to be able to find physical evidence to support her case. That is why I keep stating that it will be interesting to see what the rape kit reveals. Also remember, that the rape kit can show she had sex, but it may not tell with who if there is no DNA. I hate to keep bringing this up, but remember the Duke case?
Cal
Posts: 1340

Re: I would hate to be a criminal with......
5/15/2007 5:30:13 PM
Don''t get us wrong. We agree with you. We are just wondering why six months for the rape kit results.

If I were in that position and I had nothing to hide,I would be screeming bloody murder for a poly test.

Even if he did have consenual sex with why not just come out and say so. Guess he could want his cake and eat it also.

I will not say he is guilty nor will I say he is innocent as I was not there and I do not know the facts of the investigation. I can and as many others can only form an opinion based on what is put out i9n the media. After the job No. 3 in ratings did on the pastor in Portland.I will form an opinion on the other two,
Timothy
Posts: 21

Re: Re: I would hate to be a criminal with......
5/15/2007 6:04:04 PM
Hmmm enough evidence to go infront of the Grand Jury...impressive...cant wait May 25th
CommonSense
Posts: 1148

The Mayor called the head of DPS....
5/15/2007 9:11:21 PM
and requested that the investigation be completed sooner. Apparently the lab that will do the testing on the rape kit is understaffed and stated it would take 6 months to complete. However, a phone call to the lab has them completing it in 2-3 months.

Another thing to check is the phone record. They can check to see if the text message was sent at the time she indicates in the report. They may not be able to determine the message.
Cal
Posts: 1340

Re: The Mayor called the head of DPS....
5/16/2007 8:33:40 AM
Wonder who hit Garrett on the head to wake him up and make the phone call?

Maybe Gibbs bopped him!! :) :) :)

Well anyway,he did something right.
Timothy
Posts: 21

Re: Re: The Mayor called the head of DPS....
5/16/2007 9:27:34 AM
First off they could have requested to see her cell phone it would show a text message from him and the time sent they dont actually need to pull records, if she was smart she would have locked the message as evidence
Guido
Posts: 410

Re: Re: Re: The Mayor called the head of DPS....
5/17/2007 7:58:54 PM
First of all, six months WAS fast action from the DPS lab. Many cases take up to a year, depending upon the agency. Usually, you just get in line with all the other sex crimes. In order for this woman''s test to move up, obviously someone''s wait, perhaps that 5 year-old girl raped by an uncle, will be longer now.

Sadly, that wait will be for naught, as the defense already seems to be stipulating that sex occured. DNA will not show anything more than who made a deposit, not how forcefully said deposit was placed. There are no ""rape sperms"". There are no semen dressed as pirates boarding the undefended vagina vessel.

In other words, the DNA is actually useless in this case. Henry Garrett grandstanded by calling in a favor, and then could only cut the wait by about 1/2 to 2/3. I suppose he doesn''t pull as much weight as he thought.

Basically, the D.A. will go with her word against his to the Grand Jury. The defense will have no chance to rebut any testimony or offer their own side beyond what is allowed by the prosecution. However, once an indictment is handed down (if it happens), then the defense can go to work.

If a D.A. really wants to indict someone, it will happen. No amount of innocence will prevent it. Grand Juries can be stacked and they can also be hoodwinked. Chucky is pretty good at both.
winston
Posts: 99

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 12:21:14 AM
I believe we had a certified CSI Lab @ CCPD but Skip Noe refused to Recertify it when Alvarez was running for Sheriff.

So we have no lab because of this clown.

Blame him for the next six months.

BTW he voted for a raise for himself and the Waters Group.

What a guy
Timothy
Posts: 21

Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 8:27:07 AM
If the people in this city havent noticed we have NOTHING in this town..why? because of ALL the clowns on city council..all we have is the stupid beach,,,this isnt a real city..no amusements parks for our kids, no places like the Japanese Tea garden in SA..our kids have nothing...and why? Because of the close minded people, they dont want change in this city..WAKE UP people its like stagnate water..pretty disgusting..our streets are so ripped up and all they continue doing is putting a band-aid on the situation, no wonder when our kids graduate and move away, whats here to offer them? NOTHING!
CommonSense
Posts: 1148

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 9:02:55 AM
If it''s so bad here Timothy, why don''t you move. Find a place that is more to your liking. Personally, I can''t see living somewhere that I don''t like.
bigo
Posts: 954

Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 9:03:37 AM
Even if there were a Lab in CC, it wouldn''t be wise to do the work on a high profile case like this locally. There would be too much room for claims of ""fixing"" the results.
Timothy
Posts: 21

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 11:18:01 AM
I plan on moving this coming year..im in the process of informing the news stations and writing into the paper about little scandals first about a few people in this city, like some on city council that i know personally..ummm also a local news anchor about his infidelity along with all the proof that i have in my posession..just to make people squirm first...its kinda fun to see people squirm when they get themselves in hot water :) So Commonsense..poor choice of name for you..becareful who you piss off.
Cal
Posts: 1340

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 11:47:44 AM
Timothy:

""Payton Place"" was long ago and in a far distant land. We live here in BWBBTB and do not want to change our lifestyle.

We get our ""Soap Operas"" on local TV. Granted they are fiction,but alas,we have our real life dramas here in BWBBTB and proud of out limited exposure.

An expose would bring on many heart attacks and we could loose politicians.
Sure wish you had something on Ted Kennedy,Nancy Peloci and the rest of
The Cereal State."" :D :D Even I could be prone to heart attacks.
CommonSense
Posts: 1148

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 12:17:18 PM
So Commonsense..poor choice of name for you..becareful who you piss off.

Since you seem to know me so well, what should my name be? I will leave it up to the ones here that have met me to decide if it fits or not. Have fun with this as I will not be taking it personally.

As far as your scandals, I would suggest a little maturity on your part. Most of us left high school many years ago and don''t intend on looking back. If you are doing it to make people squirm, that shows a lack of character on your part.
Timothy
Posts: 21

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 12:30:07 PM
I plan on showing maturity..i will no longer spend my time posting on here..this site is more like high school..i have stated nothing but FACTS..and frankly i could care less what happens to those peoples lives that CHOSE to screw around. When the media gets all the emails that transpired along with the short video clip of the one you worship on here showing me his member in between his radio segments..LOL..., you make your bed..lay in it..he cheated in the past and this is his second time..good luck on your upcomming renewal on your co-anchor position in June
Guido
Posts: 410

Re: Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 1:39:00 PM
(Timothty)...like some on city council that i know personally..ummm also a local news anchor about his infidelity along with all the proof that i have in my posession..just to make people squirm first...

Dang girl! Just how many different hoohaas have you seen? Is that a hobby of yours, or do they just walk up and drop their pants? Geez, it would seem that you have an affinity for this sort of thing, as you have so much evidence. Pity the poor soul who ever confides in you.
nuecescountyuprisin
Posts: 11

Click here to email nuecescountyuprisin Talk to nuecescountyuprisin on AOL Instant Messenger

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 5:50:38 PM
timothy''s a girl?
curmudgeon
Posts: 4773

Click here to email curmudgeon

I think . . .
5/18/2007 8:12:19 PM
. . . slut would be more appropriate.
nuecescountyuprisin
Posts: 11

Click here to email nuecescountyuprisin Talk to nuecescountyuprisin on AOL Instant Messenger

Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 8:30:42 PM
BWBBTB? wtf
Timothy
Posts: 21

Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 9:06:27 PM
Why am i considered a SLUT when Eric sought me out knowingly he was married..i had NO CLUE who in the heck he was...i have emails to PROVE i asked him over and over if he was married and to be honest and he said he wasnt ALSO he said and i quote "" i should be flattered that hes emailing me"" i''m thinking WHY? #1 im far from a slut and #2 why is it when a MAN does something wrong a woman should shut her mouth well guess what it doesn''t work that way...oh and Eric i was going to keep the rest of everything to myself ( and you know what i mean) but its these IDIOTS that are going to let me spill it all..you can thank them for egging me on!
curmudgeon
Posts: 4773

Click here to email curmudgeon

You''ll have to excuse me . . .
5/18/2007 9:19:46 PM
. . . I thought someone who was screwin'' guys indiscriminately was a slut. Guys think with their pecker.
Guido
Posts: 410

Re: Re: Re: Here is a portion of the police report on Chief Smith
5/18/2007 9:30:16 PM
Hmm, it is funny that nothing is ever Timothy''s fault. It is the fault of the ""IDIOTS"" that Timbo is going to ""spill"" the beans. Funny how that less than nine hours ago she was going to stop wasting her time posting here. Yet, here she is. I suppose that is our fault, as well.

As far as spilling the beans, who cares beyond you and your accused? This site is probably only regulary perused by a handful of people, most of whom either support EVW or, like me, wouldn''t give a rat''s a$$ about what he does or with whom he does it.

In other words, you want to get into an intelligent discussion about issues of the day, you are welcome to it. If you want to spill your guts about how you were robbed of your chastity, start up your own web page. It has been done before.

The first post or two, it was a diversion. Now, it is just pathetic. If you have those e-mails and whatever photos, send them off to whomever. I seriously doubt that anyone will care. Sure, it might cause a giggle around a watercooler or two on an otherwise achingly dull Monday morning, but it will be forgotten by lunch time.

Did Angela get Tired of Wading for a real man? A Von BOYage to that Cold Shower for the little B@#ch

2007-04-02T04:56:00.001-07:00

Posted on April 2, 2007 at 06:56:28 AM by Jaime Kenedeño

Cause Number: 0701318000-H

Case Status: Pending

Cause of Action: DIVORCE

Date Filed: 03/13/2007

Date Disposed: //0

WADE, ANGELAA

vs.

WADE, ERIC VON

Num. Litigant Def/Pln Lit. Seq. # |

1 ANGELA WADE Plaintiff 0001

2 ERIC VON WADE Defendant 5002

http://forums.corvetteforum.com/showthread.php?t=1662398

http://www.co.nueces.tx.us/districtclerk/civil/causenumber.asp?cn=0701318000&database=dcivil

Eric's Bigotry Perpetuating the Hate. Boycotting Channel 10 is becoming a reality?

2006-08-25T23:39:00.000-07:00

big·ot (bĭg'ət)
n.

One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or politics and is intolerant of those who differ.

curmudgeon
Posts: 3085

Click here to email curmudgeon

Shonny Bria . . . Your are currently viewing this message
8/25/2006 1:39:10 PM
. . . smarter than I thought. Told CCISD, "Thanks, but no thanks . . . and have a nice day!."

Collapse all posts in this thread
Author Replys
anasazicoyote
Posts: 651

Click here to email anasazicoyote Talk to anasazicoyote on AOL Instant Messenger

Re: Shonny Bria . . .
8/25/2006 1:56:14 PM
Militant hispanics here will not tolerate a white person for this job.
EVW
Posts: 226

Click here to email EVW

Re: Re: Shonny Bria . . .
8/25/2006 2:23:10 PM
Seems to be a case of bigotry striking again is South Texas.
Republic69
Posts: 342

Re: Re: Re: Shonny Bria . . .
8/25/2006 2:28:28 PM
She was told to sit at the end of the bus, metaphorically!

I am telling you, this town needs to be wiped out.
JusCommonCents
Posts: 103

Re: Re: Re: Shonny Bria . . .
8/25/2006 3:21:59 PM
Very sorry that Bria chose to decline the position, but I don''t blame her one bit. Probably did not want to have an informal working lunch with CCISD staff amd be accused of not being racially sensitive because the caterer did not serve tamales! What a shame.
Rbt@pw
Posts: 5

Click here to email Rbt@pw

Re: Re: Re: Re: Shonny Bria . . .
8/25/2006 4:59:39 PM
They don''t need to wear hoods, of course, neither did the Nazi''s. With them it''s all about THE RACE and nothing about equality. They could care less about qualifications and with their mentality the schools will continue to sink lower then the current dismal quality that we have now. Personally I thank God that my kids will nver be sujected to the mantra of the government schools.
curtis rock
Posts: 893

Click here to email curtis rock Talk to curtis rock on AOL Instant Messenger Talk to curtis rock on Yahoo! Messenger

We can bring up the race issue all day....
8/26/2006 12:41:38 AM
We can talk race all day, and be hit-or-miss on the the facts. That''s the benefit of raising the controversial issue with conspiracy theories...

How about this fact... the City Government, CCISD, and other local entities quite simply take too long. By the time they reach a decision, the qualified people are already hired elsewhere, or choose to stay put where they are.

Our local government entities actually draw a great pool of talent, but after months of trying to hire someone this talent picks up better offers.
PAREAGLE
Posts: 1

Re: Shonny Bria . . .
8/25/2006 2:32:27 PM
I think the same thing is going on with the search for a new fire chief. the word is there is an anglo police chief so there has to be a hispanic fire chief,wait and see how this plays out...
SandDog
Posts: 3

Click here to email SandDog

Re: Re: Shonny Bria . . .
8/25/2006 2:51:52 PM
Once again CCISD has opened up a can of controversy and leaves this community without a superintendent. What bothers me the most is the constant closed door sessions and lack of motivation by this community to change what is obvious. The good ole boy mentality is alive folks, the only difference between then and now is that they are educated and hide the hood under the bed.
curmudgeon
Posts: 3085

Click here to email curmudgeon

Does the Mexican KKK . . .
8/25/2006 3:12:10 PM
. . . (LULAC) wear hoods?
SandDog
Posts: 3

Click here to email SandDog

Re: Does the Mexican KKK . . .
8/25/2006 3:14:15 PM
....Do they?
bigo
Posts: 504

Re: Re: Does the Mexican KKK . . .
8/25/2006 3:46:55 PM
I guess they don''t need them.

I also guess Shoney cancelled her Spanish immersion class too.
JusCommonCents
Posts: 103

Re: Does the Mexican KKK . . .
8/25/2006 3:50:30 PM
Nah....Too many kids mistake them for pinatas and beat them with sticks until candy comes out.
SandDog
Posts: 3

Click here to email SandDog

Re: Re: Does the Mexican KKK . . .
8/25/2006 4:26:26 PM
Bravo...Bravo
Cal
Posts: 722

Re: Shonny Bria . . .
8/25/2006 6:42:13 PM
I agree with you 100%.She saw the handwriting on the wall,packed her bags said ""so Long Suckers"" headed for the airport and never looked back.

God,I admire that woman. One of the few with brains. But then our loss is Washington States gain. :)
Wild Ape
Posts: 3359

Click here to email Wild Ape

Re: Shonny Bria . . .
8/26/2006 12:54:11 AM
I figured they would up the pressure till then. This ISD is so corrupt that they will not hire an outsider from another state either. Shonny Bria would have cleaned house and exposed them. They cook the books. There are more hispanic dropouts than they report and LULAC wants to keep it that way.

WATT? YA SKEERED of a little ole water and some heckles?

2006-06-23T21:22:00.000-07:00

Tearoom
Posts: 13

Click here to email Tearoom

Give Eric a dunking?
6/20/2006 10:12:07 PM
To celebrate this year's Independence there will be a whole lot of stuff going on in Kingsville on Saturday July 1st.

We have written to Eric to ask if he will volunteer to be dunked in our dunking booth - but he's a busy guy and hasn't written back yet.

Maybe he needs a little persuasion so I thought I'd post here and ask the threadsters whether you think he should take us up on the challenge.

We'll have the Chief of police and we think also the Mayor as well as other important locals - wouldn't it be great if we could throw wet sponges at Eric though?

He has many listeners in Kingsville - and the Tearoom will provide all the changing facilities and a slap-up meal to get him refreshed afterwards!

So, what do you think everyone?

- Robin

Collapse all posts in this thread
Author Replys
Major Carrales
Posts: 441

Click here to email Major Carrales Talk to Major Carrales on Yahoo! Messenger

I concur...
6/21/2006 12:11:37 AM
Eric, please reply.

I COULD be the THREADSTER EVENT OF THE SEASON.

Major Carrales
Uriel
Posts: 492

Re: I concur...
6/21/2006 12:09:03 AM
Thats so funny, the thought. :D
Uriel
UltimateMovie
Posts: 344

Click here to email UltimateMovie Talk to UltimateMovie on Yahoo! Messenger

Re: Re: I concur...
6/21/2006 2:20:27 PM
Let eric know that he can be there without his shirt on and he''ll be there.
curtis rock
Posts: 746

Click here to email curtis rock Talk to curtis rock on AOL Instant Messenger Talk to curtis rock on Yahoo! Messenger

Re: Re: Re: I concur...
6/21/2006 4:42:18 PM
Eric wouldn''t want to mess up his hair.
Tearoom
Posts: 13

Click here to email Tearoom

COME ON ERIC!
6/22/2006 12:20:22 PM
You mean like this? :)

http://ericvonwade.com/images/featuredphotos/neals.jpg

Hey Eric be a good sport!
EVW
Posts: 187

Click here to email EVW

Re: Occupational Reality Check
6/22/2006 1:21:15 PM
As much as I appreciate the sentiment and the offer I am going to decline to accept in the capacity of participation in the ""Dunking Booth."" As I am sure you all are aware there are those who would take the opportunity to percieve my vulnerability as a negative and propagate a portrayal as such. I know that this is not your hopes or intentions but unfortunately this is not the standard amongst the general public or those who disagree with me and take their politics to extream personal levels. I would be more than happy to help in other ways.

Sincerely,

Eric von Wade
Tearoom
Posts: 13

Click here to email Tearoom

Re: Re: Occupational Reality Check
6/22/2006 6:03:08 PM
I''m sorry you feel that way Eric, we have some of the most outstanding citizens in Kingsville lined up who just see it all as a laugh. I think you''d have had a very supportive crowd.

Oh well, we''d be very grateful if you happen to get a moment to mention on your show that Kingsville''s July 4th is on July 1st this year? :)

That there''s a Market day all day, a classic car show, live bands, clowns, a petting zoo and much more - terminating with a grand parade at 6:30. All happening on East Kleberg Avenue.

Cheers mate!

curtis rock
Posts: 746

Click here to email curtis rock Talk to curtis rock on AOL Instant Messenger Talk to curtis rock on Yahoo! Messenger

Re: COME ON ERIC!
6/22/2006 1:24:37 PM
I think it''s kind of intrusive to use this medium to persuade Eric to drive ALL the way out to Kingsville.

Most people would probably charge an appearance fee.
Tearoom
Posts: 13

Click here to email Tearoom

Re: Re: COME ON ERIC!
6/22/2006 6:06:37 PM
Well, you can only ask eh? And people can say yes or no - most have said ""yes"". Eric would have been very well looked after by us - as are all the other volunteers. It would have been a good photo opportunity for him too. I only asked him because he seems a great guyt who''d be up for a good laugh and wouldn''t mind the invitiation.

bigo
Posts: 399

Re: Re: Re: COME ON ERIC!
6/22/2006 6:20:27 PM
There would probably be some young folks that would line up for the chance to dunk a certain Major or Curmudgeon in Kingsville.
Tearoom
Posts: 13

Click here to email Tearoom

Come on you threadsters :)
6/22/2006 7:51:44 PM
bigo that''s not a bad idea. We could bill them as ""Eric Von Wade''s Threadsters"" (If you don''t mind Eric). How about it Major, Curmudgeon and you others? Why not share 30 minutes between you?

If you had half a dozen people that would only be 5 minutes each, and everyone will get a free meal (all you can eat) and drinks at the Tearoom (and maybe get in the paper too :)
curtis rock
Posts: 746

Click here to email curtis rock Talk to curtis rock on AOL Instant Messenger Talk to curtis rock on Yahoo! Messenger

Re: Re: Re: COME ON ERIC!
6/23/2006 12:35:21 AM
I understand that there''s nothing wrong with asking...

But putting someone on the spot in a public forum isn''t the right way to do it.

If someone doesn''t answer your private e-mail or phone calls, then chances are they''re uninterested or flat-out busy.
Guido
Posts: 204

Re: Re: Re: Re: COME ON ERIC!
6/23/2006 8:36:52 AM
Besides, all K''town does is have freaking parades. Seems like once a month they block off Kleberg for some stupid crap or other. I still laugh my ass off when I think of the train going through during that La Posada thing.

""La Posada"" is Spanish for ""drunk inbreds with lights on their pickups"", I think.

Now, Independence Day I can understand having a parade, but I see parades as yet another time when we have to act like politicians shouldn''t be lynched.
bigo
Posts: 399

Re: Re: Re: Re: COME ON ERIC!
6/23/2006 9:00:28 AM
I agree with Curtis. When you do this in public then some people start making cracks likes for instance ""not wanting to get his hair messed up"" or something like that.
Tearoom
Posts: 13

Click here to email Tearoom

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: COME ON ERIC!
6/23/2006 11:33:39 AM
You know, Eric''s a big boy and he''s his own man. He''s quite capable of answering in his own way and he did so very clearly elsewhere in this thread. It''s his discussion forum for goodness sake. A little rabble rousing''s what you need from time to time in my opinion ;) Still, I have personally apologised to Eric in case he was offended.
EVW
Posts: 187

Click here to email EVW

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: COME ON ERIC! Your are currently viewing this message
6/23/2006 1:11:00 PM
No offense take as I know there was no offense intended. I also understand why some may think I am over cautious because their thinking is not like that of those I am aware of. At private gatherings my concerns are not an issue but in public venues it opens the door for those who seek out opportunities to take liberties and this is a situation in which the possibilities for such a situation exist.
bigo
Posts: 399

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: COME ON ERIC!
6/23/2006 1:18:18 PM
My post was an attempt at some humor. When the offer was first made there were comments abbout doing it, not having to wear a shirt and getting his hair messed up. Then when Eric declined, I thought it was funny that the post''s turned to it wasn''t a good idea to do it in this forum, etc.

I understand that this can be deleted at any time, so I don''t see a problem.
Tearoom
Posts: 13

Click here to email Tearoom

Oops
6/23/2006 1:33:24 PM
Ooops - sorry for replying to your post - it was actually in answer to the next one up from Curtis - I clicked reply to the wrong one. I saw the irony in what you posted...

Mexico has discovered the method for defeating us.

2006-05-25T23:57:00.000-07:00

curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

We are at war!
1/10/2006 10:02:37 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not with Iraq but with Mexico. We have been at war with Mexico off and on since 1836. Mexico has discovered the method for defeating us. They will conquer us from the inside. They will invade us with million of their citizens who even generation later will hold allegiance to her over the U.S.

There have been disloyal immigrants to the U.S. in the past. During the Mexican-American war there were a few Irish immigrants who chose to side with the Mexicans because of their Catholic heritage. During WWI there were many German immigrants who initially sided with Germany until the U.S. entered the war. The English only rules for instruction in public schools were adopted to during WWI to address Germans not Mexicans.

Even in WWII there were disloyal immigrants. Japanese immigrants on Hawaii provided the intelligence necessary for them Empire of Japan to successfully attack Pearl Harbor.

The Mexicans are using the same techiques that the communists hope to use to defeat us. They knew they could never defeat us militarily. The will use the ballot, defeat us from the inside. Ole Homer is an operative of a foreign government.

Does anyone believe that a United States of America will still be the United States of America and not the northern province of Mexico if the majority of the citizens are Mexican. We need to address the problem now. We need to draw a line as memorable as the one drawn in the sand at the Alamo. Are you a Mexican or are you an American? No man can serve two masters.

You are an American or you are a Mexican. You can't be both.

Collapse all posts in this thread
Author Replys
sidewalk_cipher
Posts: 1872

Re: We are at war!
1/10/2006 10:18:22 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree to a point... I don''t think its some secret plot amount the masses of mexican imigrants to ""take over the US."" I don''t see it as an attack, but a really bad situation resluting from the existing curcomstances of the regions. sure the government pushes more imigrantion to America, but the imigrants themselves arn''t trying to ""take over"" but simply find a better life.

You want to win this ""war"" quite taking it out on mexicans, you''ll loose every time... look towards yourself. Have more kids, and push the western/american beliefs.

If you turn a war of democraphics into a war of guns and bombs your just asking for more trouble... fight democraphics with democraphics.... trouble is, the society you want to save, dosn''t want to save itself... women want carrears insted of babies, we don''t want to extend our culture into the future, if we did we would have more kids. Like Toynbee said, civilizations arn''t murdered, they commite suicide.

Why do you think mexicans breed more than secular americans? Might religion have something to do with it?

curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

Breeding is a problem . . .
1/10/2006 10:23:33 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . we have to accept as long as we have the 14th Amendment in force. Illegal immigration is something we don''t have to deal with. We haven''t lost a war with the Mexicans yet and this is not a time to start.
sidewalk_cipher
Posts: 1872

Re: Breeding is a problem . . .
1/10/2006 10:40:29 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Illegal immigration is something we don''t have to deal with.

With the way the country and economy is set up today.... it IS something we have to deal with... until we change our underlying desire for cheap labor.

We haven''t lost a war with the Mexicans yet and this is not a time to start.

If you keep seeing it as a ""war"" against the mexicans your bound to make bad moves... its not a ""war"" with mexicans, its a war with ourselves. We''ve been taking in imigrants from all countrys for hundreds of years... why all of the sudden are we thretened today? Because we''ve stoped breading... its not that mexicans breed to much, its that americans don''t breed enough... its not a war and invasion, its american society giving up and not wanting to repopulate itself.

You said religion is man trying to excape his mortality... I agree, he does that by having babies to carry on his beliefs... once man realises his religion is an imposible atempt to cheat his mortality he gives up....

Again, societies arn''t murdered, they commite suicide.

Its your fault, not the mexicans... until you see that your doomed to present bad solutions... like war with mexico.

curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

This is a war . . .
1/10/2006 11:12:27 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . more so than any half-assed war on drugs, or war on poverty or war on terrorism. This Mexican invasion threatens the sovereignty of the U.S. As for accepting immigrants, accepting implies a voluntary action. We have never accepted folks who demanded to come here. Most of these Mexicans are here illegally, the U.S. is a nation of legal immigrants. If we need hard working, cheap labor, let''s get it from China. Their kids can pass the TAKS.
sidewalk_cipher
Posts: 1872

Re: This is a war . . .
1/10/2006 11:22:08 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
more so than any half-assed war on drugs, or war on poverty or war on terrorism.

You''ve got a weird view of what a ""war"" is.

This Mexican invasion threatens the sovereignty of the U.S.

Its not mexican imigrants that threatens the US... its a mexican majority... which comes, not from imigration, but breeding.

As for accepting immigrants, accepting implies a voluntary action. We have never accepted folks who demanded to come here.

? America from its begining was and is a nation of imigrants.

Most of these Mexicans are here illegally, the U.S. is a nation of legal immigrants.

Legal status dosn''t change demographics. Legality dosn''t change your culture or beliefs.

If we need hard working, cheap labor, let''s get it from China.

Ok, while we''re at it, lets stop using fossile fuels, get rid of authority, and bring peace to all the nations of the world... get real... replacing mexican imigrants with chineese is totally unfeaseable.

YOur one liners, while they may sound good, when applied to the realities of a compelex world, are really silly.

curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

If . . .
1/10/2006 11:43:28 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . the majority of the people in the U.S. are Mexican will it be the U.S. or Mexico. Have you been to Laredo lately? Have you been to Robestown lately? Have you been to Brownsville lately? In my short life I can remember when they were all very different (and better) places.

I don''t have a weird idea of what war is. Read The Art of War, it is used in all three of our military academies and then come back a talk to me about war. We didn''t understand this when we fought Ho Chi Min.

You are right in that legal status does not change demographics. We have generations of Mexicans who have failed to embrace American culture (and also generations of those who have). We need to draw the line and find out where their loyalities lie. There are too many Homer''s out there.

I can generally say more in one line than you can in ten.
Wild Ape
Posts: 2743

Has Homer ever stated his position on Atzlan?
1/10/2006 11:54:08 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is Homer all about in your opinion Curm?
curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

IMHFO . . .
1/10/2006 12:08:24 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . Ole Homer is one of these Mexican revolutionaries who believes Texas and the Southwest was stolen from the Mexicans by the gringos. He is a self-proclaimed part of the Aztlan movement, the reconquesta. In reality is is just a second generation wetback who has taken advantage of our system, gotten a nice education at our expense and will try to use it to defeat us.
Jaime Kenedeno
Posts: 800

Curmy I respectfully ....
1/10/2006 12:12:14 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
disagree.

Time will tell if I am right or I am wrong.

IMO Homer is about humanity.
sidewalk_cipher
Posts: 1872

Re: If . . .
1/10/2006 1:28:39 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the majority of the people in the U.S. are Mexican will it be the U.S. or Mexico. Have you been to Laredo lately? Have you been to Robestown lately? Have you been to Brownsville lately? In my short life I can remember when they were all very different (and better) places.

You obviously prefer amreican culture over mexican... the only way to win the culture war like that is, have more people who like and believe what you believe.

I don''t have a weird idea of what war is. Read The Art of War...

To call it a war is to imply there are two oposing sides that want to conquor eachother. Only the few nuts on the fringes of both societies call for the destruction of the other... the big majority of americans and mexicans are just trying to get by. The millions coming across the boarder arn''t thinking about how their imigration will evetually lead to the fall of America.... they want a job.... looking at it like a war obscures so much of whats happening...

it is used in all three of our military academies and then come back a talk to me about war. We didn''t understand this when we fought Ho Chi Min.

So... how can you call to fight a war against the ""mexican invaders"" when you totally destroy the religious inclinations of your troops? Have you read ""art of war?""

We need to draw the line and find out where their loyalities lie. There are too many Homer''s out there.

Well, you can either round up death squads and kill these people, or expelle them or lock them up or what ever, based on their beleifs... a policy doomed to evetual failure.

OR.... grow your numbers... Its no coincidence the more religious a society the higher its birth rates.

again... societies arn''t murdered... you think its mexicans killing american society... and are ready to fight back.

They commite suicide... ie. really its you dwindling away, mexicans are just filling the void... the only real solution... breed... and pass on your traditions, values and beliefs.

curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

If the ability to breed prolificly . . .
1/10/2006 5:00:37 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . is the measure of societal success then Africa is the most successful continent on the planet.

The are two opposing sides, Mexico and the United States. I''m sure the majority of folks in both North and South Korea just wanted to get by. The same came be said for North and South Vietnam. We didn''t understand that war consisted of more than open hostilities during Vietnam and we lost.

We need to recognize those who are disloyal to the U.S. Once we brand them as the traitors they are they are no danger. The danger lies in letting them slither around undetected.

I really don''t give a fcuk if the troops pray to Buddah or the Tooth Fairy or nobody at all as long as they are loyal Americans and do their job.
sidewalk_cipher
Posts: 1872

Re: If the ability to breed prolificly . . .
1/11/2006 9:24:11 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
is the measure of societal success then Africa is the most successful continent on the planet.

50 years from now, when European languages are gone, and spanish is spoken in america you might relise the truth of your statement....

you can invenet all the cool stuff you want, if you don''t have kids to carry on your beliefs and traditions, you culture will die.

curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

Get out there . . .
1/11/2006 9:31:26 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . and save the White race! In fifty year I won''t care.
sidewalk_cipher
Posts: 1872

Re: Get out there . . .
1/11/2006 4:34:34 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get out there and save the White race! In fifty year I won''t care.

Then what the hell are you so worked up about? Why worry about a ""mexican invasion"" if you don''t care what will happen in 20-50 years?

secondly... its not a racial issue... theres no such thing as a pure race, so to save the white race is retarded... it means nothing...

Culture is what I''m talking about... and If you like american culture, which I though you did, based on your constant talk about ""mexican invasions."" Your culture will be gone...

So what is it your so worked up over? If you don''t care about the death of american culture, do you just hate mexicans?

Elwood Blues
Posts: 253

Re: We are at war!
1/10/2006 10:26:08 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
""Ole Homer is an operative of a foreign government.""

Careful,curm...you''ll have Jaime Kanabeanso citing ""Havlinka vs.Oscar Mayer"" precedents at you,or he''ll send the five invisible priests to jump you at a 7-11.

Wait!..you''re Marie..aren''t you? I KNEW it!.Why are you trimming KFATSO''s trees Marie?..and why are not advocating for South Texas Gnomes?

ICU!..pay your bills,or this will be a ""tickler"" of events to come! We at Girabaldi''s are,like Winchell,in the know!

curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

They already . . .
1/10/2006 10:39:20 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . threatened to do a drive-by on my house. I wonder how .223 round I can get into a vatomobile before it gets to the end of the block. BWAHAHA!!!
Jaime Kenedeno
Posts: 800

Who is.....
1/10/2006 11:06:53 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
they Curmy?

Jaime Kenedeno
Posts: 800

I knew you could......
1/10/2006 11:03:05 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
not ignore me Elwood.

The show was about building a wall to stop illegal immigration. Right?

I cannot belive WATT I heard today from some of the people who are supposed to have common sense.

A wall wont work period.

It is a tremendous waste of money. If they dont have the money to fund hiring 2000 border patrol per year for the next five years per the laws and budget set then where are they going to get the funding for a senseless wall. The drugs dont come through the bushes where rabbits cant go. The drugs come straight down the corridor. Immigration well that is a whole nother animal with respect to the wall. I thought that Jerry had a pretty reasonable idea although to be Border Patrol one must be bilingual amongst other qualifications. But Jerry had his heart in the right place as did Raymond. Did you guys know how Trejo''s grandparent''s arrived here illegally?

Elwood as for Marie she admittted her indiscretions to Ray right in front of my wife and me. There were two other witnesses I will not name at this time but it is not like I am trying to hurt her relationship. She did that.

And you cant write anything without resorting to name calling. You are a digression.

But you funny anyway EB.

LOL
curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

I don''t remember exactly . . .
1/10/2006 11:32:33 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . who ""They"" is but it was one of the posters on the El Defenzor board.

As far as the wall is concerned, I agree that it is a waste of money and the politicians know it. What better way to get the heat off them than to take some action they know will be ineffectual.

On the topic of illegal drugs, I wonder how a country proposes to keep illegal drugs out with more than 4,000 miles of land border and at least that much coastline when they can''t keep illegal drugs out of prisions that have walls around them and tennants who have limited if any civil rights.
Jaime Kenedeno
Posts: 800

I dont need to.....
1/10/2006 11:48:46 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
make threats.

Why would I give warning?

The drugs come straight up the corridor Border Patrol approved.

We all know that.

The ones coming through the brush,..... well they are the labor that picked the cottton before there were the inventions of Ely Whitney.

All of the Ranchers and country folk employ these illegal immigrants or as some prefer to call them undocumented workers.

Homer is not a bad guy Curmy. You know that.

Sometimes he does get blinded by being too close to the light.
curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

You know me . . .
1/10/2006 12:24:23 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . I don''t need a warning. I keep the Mini-14 by the front door and have an unobstructed 500 meter field of fire in both directions. I figure I can get magazine 1 and part of magazine 2 into any car foolish enough to shoot at my house.

I have no doubt that some of the drugs coming across have the cooperation of the Border Patrol. I worked for MoPac for 10 years as a conductor, part of the time on the Kingsville-Brownsville run and saw how easy it was to smuggle chit and how inefficient the Border Patrol was.

All the ranchers I knows around here ''em wetbacks, even the Mexican rangers.

Anyone who wants to change the U.S. into Mexico is a bad guy, in my opinion.
Jaime Kenedeno
Posts: 800

I will have no part.....
1/10/2006 12:33:44 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
of changing USA into Mexico.

That is crazy to even consider.

Homer is not about that.

He wants to help the impoverished and the poor.

There is a lot of that in Mexico.

NAFTA???

WATT is that about? fixing the roads in Mexico where the Eighteen Wheelers roll and the establishments along the highways (corridor)

I guess you know ole Ricky Alvarez eh Curmy?

I dont wanna hear about your hunting blind.

Drive byes are not my style and you know that Curmy.

My JOB is right here keeping my hands clean.

And you know thatt as well.
curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

Why is that crazy . . .
1/10/2006 12:46:04 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . to consider. We have already changed a strip a hundred miles wide or so into Mexico or a close analog. Ole Homer wasn''t unlimited access for Mexicans into the U.S. That is tantamount to turning the U.S. into Mexico.

I don''t care about the roads in Mexico . . . or England or Germany for that matter. I don''t know who Ricky Alverez is or care. I wasn''t talkin'' about my hunting blind but my home. I wonder what my neighbor, Martine would think if I fired up the neighborhood one night?
Jaime Kenedeno
Posts: 800

It aint happenin Curmy.....
1/10/2006 9:02:08 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You aint firin no bullets from your porch.

Unlimited access?? How much more unlimited can it get?

Why doncha ask Martine?
curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

Nobody ain''t . . .
1/10/2006 9:18:24 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . shootin'' at my house neither. I am a pacifist.

Me an ole Martine ain''t ''xactly on a first name basis. Hell, I didn''t even get a Christmas card from him this year.
sidewalk_cipher
Posts: 1872

Re: I will have no part.....
1/10/2006 1:54:49 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I will have no part
of changing USA into Mexico.
That is crazy to even consider.
Homer is not about that.
He wants to help the impoverished and the poor.
There is a lot of that in Mexico.

Thats what I''m talking about Crum... they don''t set out on a war to destroy the US... you SEE it as that... but thats not the thinking behind emigrants or people like Homer (excpet the few fringe crazies)

In the end they just want a better life... and that means coming here... which by default, if there are more mexicans than americans, turns the american land into a mexican culture. Its not a war... its just people acting like people.

How to stop it? Breed... work on political limits to imigration, of course... but in the end, the only way to win is to have more of people who believe like you than them... being a self proclaimed anarchist I''m guessing this will be hard for you.

curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

Total . . .
1/10/2006 2:06:14 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . bull chit. The come here because Mexico is a chit hole but they come with an attitude. The attitude is that this is really stolen territory. We really owe them. Why should they learn the language or adopt our culture, after all, this is their land.

They are coming here againt the will of the American people, so it is an invasion. They are destroying our hospitals and emergency rooms, filling our prisons and causing the quality of our education to decline and the expense to rise. We need to stop it and stop it now.

If 78% of the students in surburban Virginia and Maryland schools were Mexican it would stop overnight.
sidewalk_cipher
Posts: 1872

Re: Total . . .
1/10/2006 2:42:01 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The come here because Mexico is a chit hole but they come with an attitude.

they come with a culture... yes...

The attitude is that this is really stolen territory.

For some... do you think the average mexican imigrant gives politics that much thought?

Why should they learn the language or adopt our culture, after all, this is their land.

I think the fact that many don''t assimilate isn''t due to the land beliefs... I think a BIG part of it is american attitudes... the belief in america that they don''t have to... everything is offered in any language, they are abled by law and PC attitueds to keep their culture... if you had to move to a new land for work, and had the option of keeping what was fimilar wouldn''t you?

They are coming here againt the will of the American people, so it is an invasion.

Your arguing semantics... call it what you want, its not an organised orcastrated atempt to overthrow the US... its simply mexicans dealing with their problems the only way they know how... by leaving mexico.

They are destroying our hospitals and emergency rooms, filling our prisons and causing the quality of our education to decline and the expense to rise.

That may be true, but it dosn''t mean when Paco sets out to cross the Rio Grand he has dreams of being a drain on the american economcy and eventually bringing about its demise... he just wants a job... until you understand why people act the way they do, it will be imposible to deal with it effectivly.

We need to stop it and stop it now.

Yes, there should be some politcal fixes for imigration... the boarder should be better controled... but, that won''t stop the ones that are here from breeding... faster than you...

curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

What makes this an invasion . . .
1/10/2006 5:04:57 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . is the support, encouragement and cooperation of the Mexican government. Maybe is we put a Hellfire missle through the window of Vincente''s mansion he would get the message.
sidewalk_cipher
Posts: 1872

Re: What makes this an invasion . . .
1/11/2006 9:22:02 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
is the support, encouragement and cooperation of the Mexican government.

LIke I said, their dealing with their problems the only way they know how... by leaving... I don''t think this is part of Fox''s master plan of taking over the united States.

Maybe is we put a Hellfire missle through the window of Vincente''s mansion he would get the message.

Thats why the world hates us... no respect for other, we never stop to anaylys the situation, just blow it up, be a bad ass, and that will fix everything.

For someone who claims to be a genius, your rather slow. launching missles at mexico would do nothing but cause trouble... do ever think about your ridiculous statments? Or do you just like the sound of killing people you think inferior to you?
curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

Someone said war never solved anything . . .
1/11/2006 9:42:44 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . except slavery, Nazism, Fascism and Communism.

To tell you the truth, I don''t put a lot of deep thought into my responses to you, kinda like talkin'' to a three year old. I have been know to use hyperbole, a fact that is probably lost on you.
sidewalk_cipher
Posts: 1872

Re: Someone said war never solved anything . . .
1/11/2006 4:43:08 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Someone said war never solved anything except slavery, Nazism, Fascism and Communism.

And so thats supposed to show how killing mexicans is a viable solution to imigration?

To tell you the truth, I don''t put a lot of deep thought into my responses to you

It shows... I don''t think you put deep thought into any of your posts... you just type up what sounds good to you at the time... and I think its telling that so often what sounds good to you is basicly kill people you think inferior. Kinda like a constant frudian slip...

kinda like talkin'' to a three year old.

Then your kids must be retards if you never really think about what your saying to them... ""yea johhny drink that Draino sounds good to me...""

I have been know to use hyperbole, a fact that is probably lost on you.

No... its not... what gets me is thats ALL you use... you never stop with the smart ass comments and think about things... You act like your ""hyperbole"" are legitimate anwsers to problems.... thats stupid.

Markx
Posts: 114
Homer, a foreign spy? Is too much to swallow
1/10/2006 9:03:19 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We are at war, because we don''t agree what ""America"" really means. Poor Jenni failed in her debate today because she couldn''t quite define it.

""I am not afraid to take Homer on?"" she said proudly. Well, now it is too late to turn the pages back in time.

I took it as if Homer was fed up with people trying to ""extort"" (if I heard corrently) the meaning of America to use to their own limited aims.

We are at war, but with outselves. Curmy, you are trying to externalize the blame on the ""Mexicans."" The blame is here as Cipher said. The blending of races will occur so what. We could also benefit from learning a little Spanish. Their food is better than ""Taco Bell.""

When it comes down to it.... the question was asked long ago... ""Do we serve our country or our family first?""
The debate will linger into infinity.

Homer, we could all learn from him.
curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

Every country, every place . . .
1/10/2006 9:15:18 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . decides by a kind of consensus what to call themselves, the individuals. Folks in Los Angeles call themselves Angelinos. Why? Because they like! Folks from Mexico call themselves Mexicans in gringo or Mexicano/Mexicana in Spanish or Tex-Mex. Citizens of the U.S. call themselves Americans and the term American is recoginzed as the proper adjective to describe U.S. citizens worldwide. You seem to be the only one who has a problem distinguishing between the two. Mexicans are not Americans nor do they have the right to cross freely into this country just because of some perceived injust more than 150 years ago.

Now, while all spys are traitors, not all traitors are spys. Folks who work for the interest of a foreign government against the interest of the U.S. are traitors. Comprende?
Markx
Posts: 114
You are not a racist, just very unbalanced.
1/10/2006 10:59:44 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I''m convince you are trying to fight the Iraqi War here. Vicarious gratification.
You are at war with Homer? Mexicans? Me? You are sick, a sickly coward.
curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

As stated earlier . . .
1/11/2006 7:37:11 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . the U.S. which would include me as a loyal American, is at war with Mexico. If you are a Mexican or someone collaborating with Mexico that would be you. If you are a loyal American, of course, it wouldn''t. The same holds for ole Homer.

You seem to be the one who has the back problem.
dannoynted1
Posts: 159

americano! americano! comprende?
1/11/2006 1:01:28 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
americano !americano
Posted on January 11, 2006 at 02:11:33 AM by dannoynted1

ok a grand style miss trejo had this morning on KEYS concerning her deep ""reciting of the pledge of allegiance

though she could have stated it ""in her own words""

she forgot the ""flag"" part though

i prefer the ""one nation under GOD,
INDIVISIBLE with LIBERTY and JUSTICE FOR ALL!

i mean that is what ""home of the brave""
is all about!

i too am ""an american""
but i know that justice is politically subjective that is when the ""job opportunities"" are modifiable!

fourty five dollars is all yanqui

for one americano?

roe v wade ring a bell?

lets not forget supreme court case of 1977!

claiming its not the fault of the child
dannoynted1
Posts: 159

Re: We are at war! ole curmy on watt meds?
1/11/2006 5:07:37 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Even in WWII there were disloyal immigrants. Japanese immigrants on Hawaii provided the intelligence necessary for them Empire of Japan to successfully attack Pearl Harbor.

yeah and?

we did cut off their oil and?

what did hawaiian japs know about the why their ""friends"" were asking about the weather?

uss arizona my dear watson!

that the communists hope to use to defeat us. They knew they could never defeat us militarily. The will use the ballot, defeat us from the inside. Ole Homer is an operative of a foreign government.

au contrare

the commies built the wall idioto

so if homer is for the wall then he would be a communist!

get your history straight!~

OKAY CHEW ON THAT FAT FOR A WHILE
curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

Drop . . .
1/11/2006 7:44:42 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . the crack pipe and step away from the keyboard!

Anyone who thinks the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was justified is either on crack or dare I say it . . . an idiot.
Markx
Posts: 114
antiseptic
1/11/2006 8:40:05 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One work curmy, antiseptic. You are giving this board a bad breath. Your argument are too racially charged against Mexican. My wife and her family by the way are Hispanic.

Your hate I would not allow into my household. My children I hope will never come across someone like you.
curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

Your wife . . .
1/11/2006 9:01:06 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . and her family may indeed be from Spain but I suspect that she is Mexican like most of the others who use that label around here.
Markx
Posts: 114
YOU R AT WAR WITH YOURSELF
1/11/2006 10:40:00 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You biggest enemy is not Mexico. It is yourself. You need to find an enemy to transfer all your frustrations and shortcomings.

Hold yourself accountable. We all have to fit in to this world.
curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

Everyone has . . .
1/11/2006 11:15:13 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . a degree of frustration, I suppose. As far as shortcoming, everyone has those, you would certainly know.

That said, the issue is not me but an invasion of the U.S. by millions of Mexicans. Some say they have a right to be here. I call those who say that traitors and colaborators.
Markx
Posts: 114
Curmy, why do u want a racial war?
1/11/2006 12:32:42 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get a life.
curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

I have a life . . .
1/11/2006 12:41:02 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . a very interesting one, I might add. I don''t want a war. The U.S. didn''t invade Mexico (lately) they are invading us. Don''t want a war, tell the Mexicans to stay in Mexico unless they chose to enter the U.S. legally. Simple!
sidewalk_cipher
Posts: 1872

Re: I have a life . . .
1/11/2006 4:50:05 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you deal is you just don''t like illegal imigration, why call it a war? Thats your silly ""hyperbole"" again. Seriously, if all you care about is illegal imigration, start writing your congressmen, join the minutemen, quite whining and turning it into a ""i''m beter than you"" debate, and argue for better imigration laws.
curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

If we can have a war . . .
1/11/2006 8:06:46 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . on poverty, a war on drugs and a war on terror why not a war on wetbacks?
HardcoreHarry
Posts: 1757

In the Spirit of Shock and Awe...
1/11/2006 8:14:20 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
we can call this war...

""WOW!!!""

=chuckle=

Hardcore Harry

Wild Ape
Posts: 2743

Art of War
1/12/2006 8:05:44 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sidewalk you miss Curm''s point. Ever read Sun Tzu''s Art of War. I''d prefer that you don''t because it would make Spengler read like popcorn.

Mexico is using tactics against us as though we were the enemy in every action they make. Don''t think of a war in the conventional sense.

Elwood Blues
Posts: 253

The point we seem to be missing..
1/12/2006 11:56:28 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
..with regards to walls,illegal immigration,ect.is terrorism.

After 9/11,it''s been clearly demonstrated that terrorists can and will attack us on our own soil.Despite the ""wartime"" Prezdent''s assertions,the invasion of Iraq isn''t making a dent in the radical Islamist ""Death to America"" factions.In fact,the argument can be made that Bush''s actions have actually fueled such sentiment.

That being said..if you''re a small band of terrorists with a few suitcase bombs,and you''re looking for the easiest,most inconspicuous way to smuggle yourself and your bombs into the country..where would you attempt entry into the U.S.? Through Canada?..maybe,but it would be difficult,as the Canadians tend to be a bit picky about who they allow into the country.Entry from the east or west is extremely difficult..which leaves the south border..a little over 2,000 miles long,stretching across four states.

Couple that with Mexico''s almost non-existent immigration policy,and the fact that countries to the south of Mexico have hundreds and hundreds of rebel factions that would be more than happy to help groups like Al-Quaida attack America (remember..the enemy of my enemy is my friend)..and it''s easy to see that the most convienient and expedient way to enter the U.S. is via the south borders.

IMO..the threat of terrorism is the most compelling argument for tightly securing the Mexican border..not who''s more ""American"" or race baiting arguments perpetuated by ""advocates"" that serve no purpose other than to fan the flames of racial divisivness for their own ends.
curmudgeon
Posts: 2882

Protecting the U.S./Mexican . . .
1/12/2006 12:08:09 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. . . from terroristinfiltration is certainly an aspect of the problem. How can you strip search little old ladies and make babies take their shoes off in airports when we let million of folk walk across our southern border completely unvetted.
Jaime F Kenedeno
Posts: 6

WATTA YA SKEERED OF ERIC
5/26/2006 12:12:59 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
""We The People""?

""Engaging the average citizen in the formulation of Public Policy"" is our mission @ Team Kenedeno.

""The Net is a powerful force for change -- and a dynamic tool for citizen education and action. Read the latest research on citizen participation online, the stories and experiences of coalitions, corporate clients, and others working in the cyber trenches, and discover the potential to become an active participant in online democracy.""

Cant yall guys feel that rumble?

The City Council and Loyd Neal are fixin to take a tumble.

Is it true the company that hires city employees is insured by LLoyd?

Not of London either!

Remember Eric, my goal is to engage the average citizen in the formulation of public policy.

Are you against informing the Public in a balanced manner?

WATT Rule did I violate so as to be censored?

If you are against Freedom of Speech then erase ME.

This is WATT Eric Von Wade Supports. Stirring the Hate & Lovin it!

2006-05-18T19:02:00.000-07:00

Restaurants & media threatened via emails
Posted on May 3, 2006 at 00:50:22 AM by MX

Many Mexican restaurants in Corpus Christi are reporting threats being made by local citizens such as La Playa and various others.
Other groups and persons are receiving the following emails:

EXAMPLE 1
We should be shooting you brown bastards at the border and letting your bloody corpses float to the Gulf. We should be killing your "anchor" babies in our hospitals and using them for experiements. You WILL NOT get my neighborhood .. you will DIE in the process!

EXAMPLE 2
I'm going to burn you alive you potbellied monkey, and your family too. Actually, before that happens, your genitals will be severed and filmed being fed to a Chihuaha as you watch in deathly shock. And next Mr. Chihuaha will have his skull caved in as you watch. I won't crush yours in because I want you to be fully alert as you burn to death, assuming you haven't died of fright already. Yes, I will film all this and burn it onto a stack of CD's, bought with cash in another state, so manuf. #s don't put the Feds in the ballpark, free of UUIDS and identifying traces, then tape my masterpiece in public locations well after dark in case tiny hidden surveillance cams are on a loop. It would be too difficult to post on YouTube without some evidence dropped.

EXAMPLE 3
Please you scum sucking spics, try to take part of America from us. I will enjoy slaughtering your people just as my forefathers did. Mexico is nothing compaired to the United States. We are strong and powerful while children go hungry on your streets because of your incompetence. You will be destroyed and you will all die.

http://b4.boards2go.com/boards/board.cgi?action=read&id=1146635422&user=defensornews

Heinous people like this.....
Posted on May 3, 2006 at 00:59:39 AM by Jaime Kenedeno

I summon your demons.

In the name of Christ

BE GONE!

QA @ the gates of Hell!

Sound like somebody didnt get their way.

Why so upset?

The immigration Law recently passed in December is in the haters favor.
Report these threats to Homeland Security.

That's their JOB!

Hey CAP
Posted on May 3, 2006 at 01:07:55 AM by Jaime Kenedeno

Homer should have taken his guitar today.

It would have soothed them.

Gifford and Molly should tone down the rhetoric as the volatility is unpredictable currently.

The ratings are not worth the blood.

Borderline riot enciting will draw a heavy burden on the station.

I thought the afternoon show was in good taste.

Although it did sting at the end.

The Robstown Whenger is an insult....

2006-02-28T21:39:00.000-08:00

HardcoreHarryPosts: 1453

The Robstown Whenger is an insult.... 2/28/2006 8:19:58 AM
intelligent thinking listeners of 1440 Keys. Why Bob Jones lets H. Villareal make unsubstantiated claims about "big money" dictating local politics without any real evidence is beyond me. Let's hear some real evidence of misdeeds, not some generalized whengefest that offers nothing in the way of proof! Bob Jone's "guest" sounds like a audio recording for the visually impaired. He has seen "nothing" but has "heard" it repeated (and then it is most often himself that is doing the repeating!) about how all politicians are corrupt. Rambling on and on about how the political machine keeps the little man down and taking potshots at folks who live on the "island" like the caller Sally did was cheap and makes for very bad radio. Hey I live on the island and I don't consider myself part of any well oiled politco machinations that rule over the lowborn and uneducated. Truth is, anybody can live out here on the island if they put their mind to it. First step, get a job! Hardcore Harry
Collapse all posts in this thread
Author
Replys
HardcoreHarryPosts: 1453

Re: The Robstown Whenger is an insult.... 2/28/2006 8:23:21 AM
blah..my cut and paste from MS Word left out ""to."" I need to hire Sidewalk Cipher for all my cut and paste needs! It should read with the title: ""The Robstown Whenger is an insult.... to intelligent thinking listeners of 1440 Keys."" Hardcore Harry
curtis rockPosts: 316

Re: The Robstown Whenger is an insult.... 2/28/2006 8:27:33 AM
I have no response to the Island issue, I think you''re right. I know a lot of people who live on the Island who are not political, and merely work hard to have a home there. In terms of money and politics, it is very true and Homer is correct. However, I refuse to write about it on this forum for legal and business reasons, so hopefully the next time around that we meet, I can discuss it with you. As someone involved in the Engineering and Construction industry, I can identify bribery in local government on a frequent basis. It''s not fair, and it''s damn near impossible to crack, but it exists because there''s the principled way, and then there''s the political way. I really wish I could talk about it here, but it would be a poor practice. We''ll talk it in-person.
HardcoreHarryPosts: 1453

Re: Re: The Robstown Whenger is an insult.... 2/28/2006 9:01:31 AM
Would you agree that raising the issue on the air without offering proof to substantiate his claims makes for bad radio? Better to leave it be than whenge on and on the way he does. If he insists on making it his ""cause de guerre"" why not offer some real solid proof of misdeeds? I believe our political system would benefit greatly if some of this corruption were made transparent. Sure it might be a fantastic scandal, but we can get over that. I can think of nothing better to restore the voter’s faith in government than to clean house and get rid of the taint of corruption. Hardcore Harry
JusCommonCentsPosts: 13
Re: Re: Re: The Robstown Whenger is an insult.... 2/28/2006 9:16:20 AM
I agree with you that if a person chooses to go on the air waves and make references to corruption in our government, he should be willing to provide names, dates and exactly what he observed in order for the public to be better informed about the issue. However, allowing someone to go on the radio with unsubstantiated claims DOES capture the attention of the public and increase station ratings, and for some people that''s a good thing.
curmudgeonPosts: 2275

I ain''t ''xactly a fan of Goat Boy . . . 2/28/2006 9:22:03 AM
. . . but he is right on this one. The district courts in Nueces County are being bought and paid for by Watt and his cabal of wealthy trial lawyers. Do you expect them to give receipts. What makes this chit a haven for these low-lifes is the potential jurors. Where else will you find a more ignorant collection willing to loot any deep pockets. Buying the local judges is just icing on the cake. We have created a money machine for them and they know it.
CommonSensePosts: 186
Curmudgeon... 2/28/2006 9:26:20 AM
one of these days I will make your day by asking Goat Boy how he got his nickname on the air.
JusCommonCentsPosts: 13
Re: Re: The Robstown Whenger is an insult.... 2/28/2006 9:03:25 AM
Curtis Rock is correct about local government in regards to shady business and operational practices. There are certain individuals that give preferential treatment to other individuals under the time-honored ""One Hand Washes The Other"" tradition. At times you do not even have to have the right facts to win favor in regards to your cause, you just have to know the right people. A very sad situation, but very true. In following the lead of CR, writer will not get into specifics for fear of the job related and quite possible legal problems that could occur.
Capt CarralesPosts: 1963

I am now going to call into question the nature of politics... 2/28/2006 9:22:27 AM
If you think about it (An observation from CAPT OBVIOUS) all politics is" name=54420
CommonSensePosts: 186
Every government has its level of deceit... 2/28/2006 9:24:13 AM
That seems to be the norm these days. However, this doesn''t mean that everyone in politics is corrupt. There are still a few good politicos out there. They just seem to be outnumbered. As to Curtis Rock and JusCommonCents I need to add that the both of you should be very careful when commenting on ""things"" you know. In the military if you knew something to be classified, you didn''t say, ""I would tell you but it''s classified"". You just avoided that subject all together. If you know of business that are getting preferential treatment, for whatever reason, you say that and be done with it. Anytime you state that job related and legal problems could arise, you draw a lot more attention to yourself. JusCommonCents has a certain amount of anonymity in these posts but Curtis Rock doesn''t. You really need to think before you post. Just my thoughts.
curtis rockPosts: 316

Re: Every government has its level of deceit... 2/28/2006 9:37:32 AM
Like I said, I know of things and I will speak of them but I am not willing to put it in writing here. I will talk to you in-person, and even present research to you in-person. If I write it down here, then I''m putting myself into a great deal of liability. As far as drawing attention to myself, I don''t see it as a problem on here. My response was directed to Harry when it seemed he doubted that money and politics were not intermingled. One association that I''m highly involved in is the Associated Builders and Contractors, and there''s books full of research information regarding local construction that demonstrates some questionable actions.
HardcoreHarryPosts: 1453

Re: Re: Every government has its level of deceit... 2/28/2006 2:14:16 PM
Just for the record, I do not doubt that there is corruption in some facets of local politics here in South Texas. This all goes back to what Captain/Major Carrales was saying sometimes back on the burden of proof being on the negative. I also question whether Homer is ""connected"" that well and if he even has the ""goods"" on any officials. Let''s suppose he does know something and is not telling, doesn''t that make him a facilitator of the very corruption he purports to be speaking out against???? He would get a big ""Hell yeah! Bring it on!"" from me if he were to come out with the evidence. That he has not done so thus far can mean one of two things: 1) He doesn’t have any evidence. Or, 2) He has evidence but he won''t release it for fear of reprisals from the ""machine."" That would make him a ""caged crusader"" instead of the garden-variety ""caped"" kind that he plays every Tuesday. There is no such thing as courage emanating from inaction. You can quote me on that! Hardcore Harry
JusCommonCentsPosts: 13
Re: Every government has its level of deceit... 2/28/2006 9:58:27 AM
Point well taken Common Sense. Thanks for the words of caution.
Wild ApePosts: 2125

Re: Re: Every government has its level of deceit... 2/28/2006 1:19:27 PM
True but you two aren''t on the radio saying this. I think there is a difference. As for building contracting that is why I don''t do that work any more. It is a dirty business. I know what you all mean about corruption.
curtis rockPosts: 316

County Commissioners to Help Kingsville Pharmacy School

2006-02-25T22:07:00.000-08:00

curtis rockPosts: 312

County Commissioners to Help Kingsville Pharmacy School 2/23/2006 12:41:01 AM
from the Caller Times: Nueces County commissioners could help Rangel School By Brandi Dean/Caller-Times February 22, 2006 Nueces County commissioners voted 3-2 Wednesday to approve a contract for consulting services with Texas A&M University-Kingsville that will provide the university with $1 million a year for the next three years. It is believed the money will be used to help with the opening of the Irma Lerma Rangel School of Pharmacy at A&M-Kingsville. I attended this meeting (as I usually do), and Chuck Cacales and Betty Jean Longoria voted"
Collapse all posts in this thread
Author
Replys
Capt CarralesPosts: 1947

Re: County Commissioners to Help Kingsville Pharmacy School 2/23/2006 8:15:25 AM
(REPEAT) I do not agree with it, but I must make a caveat to all this. When NAS Corpus Christi makes its way back to the" name=54200 for be or a and of will County the I
LONEWOLFPosts: 306
Re: Re: County Commissioners to Help Kingsville Pharmacy School 2/23/2006 12:23:42 PM
As to ""the DEl MAR taxing entity"", if you''re refering to HB 2221 in the last session of the ledge, HB 2221 would have basically extended the taxing district to include all of Nueces, Aransas, Kenedy, San Pat and part of Kleberg counties. As to NASCC being on the chopping block via BRAC, no county money from any county should have been spent on the embarassing ""Please Don''t Close Our Base Campaign"". The decision should have been left to the military and the committee. If it results in area counties and cities not rallying money and support to fight closing a base that has been deemed unnecessary it''s a good thing.
Capt CarralesPosts: 1947

The"
...was the WASTE of MONEY that should have been protested. There was no way to save those bases by lobbying or payment. That would morally amount to bribery. I recall that these people went on the talkshows and fought for that conceptually similar appropration of funds. Texas A&M University-Kingsville is not a KINGSVILLE or KLEBERG county insitituion. It is a State institution. People are looking at this as a ""Why are we giving Kingsville that money?"" I say it is a waste...but don''t be so CORPUSCENTRIC and be fair to the contemporary history of all this. If Kleberg County was expected to ""picth in"" to save the Federal Institutions of NAS Corpus Christi and NS Ingleside...Nueces County better be prepared to do the same to save a State Institution in Kleberg County. And that''s one form you ""county Cousin!!!""
curtis rockPosts: 312

Re: The"
The big difference is money is being spent on a study (whatever that''s suppposed to mean). Whereas in the BRAC situation, money was being spent for lobbying and campaign efforts. At least in BRAC, money was spent on an idea, but in this situation there isn''t a single idea about where the 1-million is being spent on. It would be like setting up a personal budget for several thousand dollars for home improvements without any idea of what improvements would be made. Budgets should not be designed for such specific cluelessness.
JusCommonCentsPosts: 3
Re: County Commissioners to Help Kingsville Pharmacy School 2/23/2006 2:06:49 PM
JUDGE SHAMSIE IS NOT RUNNING FOR RE-ELECTION SO IT DOES NOT REALLY MATTER WHAT THE TAXPAYER THINKS OF HIS CURRENT DECISIONS AT THIS POINT. AND AS LONG AS HE HAS AT LEAST TWO COUNTY COMMISSIONERS VOTING HIS WAY..IT''S A DONE DEAL. ALL I DID WAS SMILE WHEN I HEARD THE NEWS BECAUSE YOU COULD NOT WRITE A BETTER COMEDY IF YOU TRIED.
BlindBobPosts: 479
Re: County Commissioners to Help Kingsville Pharmacy School 2/23/2006 8:33:00 PM
Nueces County has approved three million dollars in ''consulting fees'' over the next three years to be paid to TAMUK. The money will be paid for, among other things, a study on how the Nueces County can be run more efficiently. What a crock. Unable to organize its own financing for its pharmacy school, the politicians of the two counties have wrangled a deal and the citizens of Nueces County will pay for it. This is what happens when we fail to vote and fail to hold our elected officials accountable for their actions. This deal stinks.

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Also the 13.3 mill of TAMUKS was bartered away for a new District Court in Cleberg.Posted on February 26, 2006 at 00:30:30 AM by Jaime Kenedeño
I told yall a long time ago about this. Now it is affecting YOU. Should have spoke up earlier oh Blind One? Should have listened and engaged yourself in the formulation of South Texas Public Policy.

BB, this is about WATT the Politicians did not do for South TexasPosted on February 26, 2006 at 00:18:16 AM by JaimeGood I am glad it pissed you off! You know WATT they say right BB? Better to be pissed off than pissed on. Dont you see that it is a barb from Shamsie? Better than to leave it for Neal to steal. And besides WATT about the bigger crocks like the would be money for Randy Delay and the inefficiently spent money at Naval Station Ingleside? WATT a crock! You are Blind selectively arent you BB?

Did you say the deal stinks?Posted on February 26, 2006 at 00:05:52 AM by elWATTSamattaI was present when Chuck Cazales made the remark that he smelled a skunk. Judge Shamsie then ordered every Commissioner to put Odor Eaters in their shoes. Guess what! Commissioner Cazales disappeared. Shamsie, you're good.

http://stxc.blogspot.com/2006/02/great-day-for-education-in-south-texas.html

`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````

bigoPosts: 263
Re: Re: County Commissioners to Help Kingsville Pharmacy School 2/23/2006 9:23:08 PM
I hate to sound like my old friend Jaime but I wonder what Shamsie''s plans for the future are. Not elected office, but maybe something better??
Capt CarralesPosts: 1947

Maybe... 2/23/2006 9:24:31 PM
...President of TAMUK? Major Carrales
bigoPosts: 263
Re: Maybe... 2/23/2006 9:46:21 PM
How does ""TAMUK Irma Rangel,Shamsie and Nueces County Taxpayer''s Pharmacy School"" sound??
anasazicoyotePosts: 282

Re: County Commissioners to Help Kingsville Pharmacy School 2/24/2006 8:52:04 AM
Shamsie School of Pharmaceuticals. He''s got to be on drugs.

Hey Threadsters WATT DID I tell you guys about the annexation of the Island Portion of Cleberg County? @ Port Royal? Remember?

2006-02-10T00:37:00.000-08:00

Beach takeover
I hope everyone in Corpus Christi and especially those who live on North Padre Island took the time to read Nick Nelson's article ("City says neigh to new stable," Jan. 28).
Apparently, Mr. A.R. Graham, owner of Mustang Riding Stables, would like to move his business to a 50-acre beachfront location just south of Balli Park, but the city won't allow him to do so. Why? According to Mr. Nelson, this land was annexed by the city in 2001, and zoned for high-rise condos and apartments.
Forget the vehicles. Let's talk about a public asset that the residents of Padre Island, the citizens of Corpus Christi, and, in fact, all Texans have a vested interest in. Before our elected officials give away to any group of real estate speculators the public's unabridged right of access to their beaches, these officials ought to make sure the public benefits from the transfer. No one yet has proven that to me.
Give 'em an inch . . . and they'll take a mile. First north of Balli Park and soon, a mile south.
Dave Plut
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Why did the City of Corpus Christi annex property that belonged to Cleberg County? Why did out of state workers (from Louisiana) work for BNP in the Land Cut before the rape (drilling) of the National Seashore? Texas Observer Political Intelligence: 3/15/2002 Barbara Canales-Black, who is running for the open Senate District 20 seat in South Texas, is co-owner of BNP Petroleum, which has recently begun drilling for natural gas on Padre Island National Seashore. Canales-Black’s firm quietly obtained the permit in February from the National Park Service, and the drilling has since become a hot issue in South Texas and in the election. She has three primary opponents, including McAllen State Represen-tative Juan Hinojosa, and a runoff is possible. (At press-time, the primary is still five days away.) Canales-Black is the scion of a well-connected political family and has been using her oil wealth to outspend Hinojosa three to one in the race. Her father is Tony Canales, Tony Sanchez’s private attorney. (Canales, you may recall, was the one who hired the private dicks involved in the embarrassing investigation–some say smear campaign–against former Secretary of State Henry Cuellar.) To access the site, BNP had to bulldoze a road through pristine dunes. The site itself is covered by a 1.7 acre well-pad made of crushed rock. As obtrusive as this is on an almost completely undeveloped national seashore, this well may be just the beginning. The company’s permit applies to a 1300 square-kilometer drilling area on the island, and BNP also has plans to do slant drilling–for oil, not gas–from the shore out into the bay and gulf. According to Erin Rogers of the Sierra Club, the company has benefited from the Bush administration’s "streamlined" National Park drilling rules, which do not require a separate environmental impact statement for each new well in a permitted drilling area. To add insult to injury, as recently as eighteen months ago the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service had planned to designate as much as 7,000 acres in the area as critical habitat for the piping plover, a threatened bird. This designation would have made much of BNP’s proposed drilling area off limits. But BNP came back with their own habitat study, which predictably recommended protecting a much smaller portion of the seashore. Backed by Nueces County and local Chambers of Commerce, the company successfully lobbied FWS to reduce the protected area to 2,000 acres.

CCCT Article by Nelson
Before it was annexed by the city in 2001, the land was zoned for farming and ranching and was used as a stable. After the annexation, the city zoned the newly acquired land for high-rise condos and apartments, but the stable was grandfathered in and allowed to remain.

-->
Graham wants to join with that stable and take advantage of its grandfathered status, but the city says any addition to the stable, even additional horses, would violate the new zoning ordinance. Graham said the city so far has been inflexible in negotiations about the new site.
"It doesn't matter what you say to them - they just don't give a damn," he said.
Robert Payne, senior planner for Corpus Christi, said Graham's business worked well on Mustang Island, where the beach is wider and less crowded, but would be a poor fit for Padre Island.
"We're pro-business in this community, but this looks like compatibility is an issue on the island for this business," he said. Payne said the land would have to be rezoned as light industrial to accommodate the riding stables, but the city's current policy advises planners not to zone any of Padre Island for industrial use.
Graham had considered retirement last year, and even floated the idea to friends and customers.
"I was just going to take all my horses and move them to a ranch somewhere. There are a few old horses that have treated me real well, and I was thinking of putting them out to pasture," he said. "But then I had over a thousand calls asking why I wasn't staying in business."
Now Graham says he's determined to open the business again - and he hopes to do so in the next two weeks. He said that if necessary, he will take the issue to court. "I'll go out of town and get a lawyer who doesn't know anybody in this town and sue the city."
Contact Nick Nelson at 886-3678 or nelsonn@ caller.com

Hey Threadsters WATT DID I TELL YOU GUYS about MIKAL?

2006-02-06T00:52:00.000-08:00

I wonder why the threadsters have nothing to say about MIKAL WATTS.

No Stones?

Mikal Watts,..... has he bought the silence of EVW.

I do know he has spent a lot of money at the station.

WATT are you afraid of Mr Conservative talk show host and groupies?

Chickenshits!

No balls.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOL!!!

South Texas Chisme: Old fashion investigative reporting - Caller Slime you could learn something!

2006-02-03T19:30:00.000-08:00

South Texas Chisme: Old fashion investigative reporting - Caller Slime you could learn something!

Cant forget about ME eh? Anybody else getting Jaime spam?

2006-02-01T22:08:00.000-08:00

HardcoreHarryPosts: 1793

Anybody else getting Jaime spam? 1/31/2006 11:15:22 AM
Jaime seems to think that if we disagree with Eric over an issue--the beach--that we are automatically opposed to Eric on all fronts. Moreover, I think it is comical that he tries to tie the whole thing into his grand conspiracy theories of the KFATSO puppet masters pulling all the strings here in the region, including Eric's support of the beach development. My disagreements to the beach project stem on access, not so much on economics. Hardcore Harry
Collapse all posts in this thread
Author
Replys
UltimateMoviePosts: 262

Re: Anybody else getting Jaime spam? 1/31/2006 11:22:46 AM
yes...i get his crap. and i don''t disagree with eric about beach. I think he''s just sending it out to who will listen.
Elwood BluesPosts: 140

Re: Re: Anybody else getting Jaime spam? 1/31/2006 12:08:42 PM
No spam from the Jaimster YET..athough an entire thread from this board on the beach issue was copied and pasted on the other board. LOL..you''re now known as ""HH @KEYS""..""ape @KEYS""..""BB @KEYS""..""4 Curmy @ KEYS""..ect. Since you folks are all ""@KEYS"" now..does this mean you''re all now ""co-hosts""?..did KEYS make all of you ""an offer"",too? When''s the ""Curm Show""?
Wild ApePosts: 2015

Ellwood---Broom Closet shameless plug 2/1/2006 6:55:00 AM
In the Arts and Entertainment forum there are some blogs that are secret golden nuggets. We have our own internal forum shows where we poke fun at everyone or anything. Brace yourself, Sidewalk, Lonewolf, and others show their talent there and they are GOOOOD! The regulars there are Captain, randall, Harry, and yours truly. I highly recommend even going back a few pages there. Harry''s--Threadster Deliverance Captain--Pick any Radio Drama they are usually three parters Randall--I like solgiers but it is heavy and isn''t a comedy This might be the source where they think we are hosts. As looney as they are I wouldn''t doubt they think it.
EVWPosts: 345

Re: Re: Re: Anybody else getting Jaime spam? 2/1/2006 8:46:03 AM
I had to get real serious in order to stop getting the crap from Jaime. Are we even sure Jaime is an adult? This whole argument he is having with me over the structure of KEYS radio is completely absurd and like a child throwing a tantrum he can''t let it go. Now everybody speaks for KEYS. You’re a host, I''m a host, wouldn''t ya like to be a host too? We could sing it to the tune of the old Dr. Pepper theme. It''s amazing that we had a supposed grown man try to argue with me, an 11 year host at KEYS radio, about who was a host and who spoke for KEYS because he listened to the radio and that’s all he needed. When proven wrong he just keeps going like nothing happened. If you guys are interested you should go to the last pages and look at the Jaime Kenedeno posts I saved from his first visit to this site. First, no one knew what the hell he was talking about, second when he talks about individual hosts he doesn''t use KEYS at all and certainly not interchangeably with the actions of the host or guests and third you can see Condot''s first appearance in some of the very same threads making thinly veiled threats of involving me in a lawsuit if I don''t stop Jaime from posting on my website. I have to say, I don''t thing it''s simply because I''ve seen the bottom of the intellectual barrel with some of the thugs just mentioned but you guys that have been here as well as the newer threadsters like Elwood, Guido, Marine, and the rest are doing an impressive job. I didn''t think I would say that about Elwood when he re-emerged after years of absence but I think Elwood hadn''t listened to my show in quite sometime and your impression was based on something from 9 or 10 years ago. I could be wrong but I don''t sense the animosity that you had on first appearance. I certainly have found myself agreeing with you on more than one issue. Not the extreme left-winger I first thought you''d be. I have even adopted the Ninja-Death-Debate tactics of Curm. I don''t use it nearly as proficiently or often but sometimes justice comes through nuclear aggravation and that''s a punishment I like to dish out. But just like the nuclear bomb, I think it should be used as a last resort. I will have to say it''s nice to know there''s a few fellows who won''t be sneaking up on us at night cause they''re glowing in the dark.
Elwood BluesPosts: 140

Re: Re: Re: Re: Anybody else getting Jaime spam? 2/1/2006 3:31:39 PM
""Are we even sure Jaime is an adult?"" A legitimate question,but chronologically..yeah..I believe so.I''ve talked to him about this on other boards and suggested he just drop it..after all,it''s just a question of semantics anyway..host,co-host,guest host,hostess with the mostest..what difference does it make? His boy is on the radio,getting his ""message"" out to some extent..wasn''t that the ultimate goal? But Jaime (or ""plume de la guerra"") as he''s taken to calling himself now feels that somehow he was personally slighted by you,Eric,so I imagine he''ll still wield the ""pen of war"" in your direction. ""I didn''t think I would say that about Elwood when he re-emerged after years of absence but I think Elwood hadn''t listened to my show in quite sometime and your impression was based on something from 9 or 10 years ago."" Closer to 5-6 years ago,maybe..but spot on in the assessment,nonetheless.Water under the bridge,though..that was then..this is now.I''ll be the first to admit that my reentry to this board was rather inauspicious,and probably could have been done differently in retrospect,but it''s nice to know there''s no lingering animosity. A word of caution to prospective threadsters looking to make an entry here..don''t do it the way I did it.""Sargeant-at Arms"" Wild Ape will have you rounded up and you''ll be standing before Hardcore Harry and the Captain faster than you can reboot,and that''s not anyplace you want to be..trust me on this,folks. ""I could be wrong but I don''t sense the animosity that you had on first appearance.I certainly have found myself agreeing with you on more than one issue.Not the extreme left-winger I first thought you''d be."" Nahhh..no animosity here.I actually like it here.Ape turned out to be a really likable guy,Harry''s as good as they come,the Captain is the sort of man you hope your kids grow up to be,and Blind Bob,though I don''t really know him,is one of the most formidible intellects I''ve run across on a board..not the kind of guy you''d want to go up against without having your ""stuff in one sock"" and even then,it''s a dicey proposition. ""I have even adopted the Ninja-Death-Debate tactics of Curm."" Hahahaha! Curm skipped the Dale Carnegie course,didn''t he? Remember,though..curm''s an expert at those tactics with years of skill as a guerilla poster.He takes no prisoners.Those using curm''s tactics without his degree of expertise risk ""being hoisted on their own petards"" (copyright,Blind Bob,2005,all rights reserved)
Wild ApePosts: 2015

He probably misses us 1/31/2006 12:07:30 PM
I think I saw him alone last on a post with all his friends. If he doesn''t keep up with his light bill he may be totally cut off from society.
BlindBobPosts: 549
Re: Anybody else getting Jaime spam? 1/31/2006 12:18:13 PM
In addtion, ""somebody"" is posting virtually the entire beach issue discussion on ''that other board''. Each one posted with ""name@KEYS"", the name changing with each of the copied and pasted posts. Pretty creepy.
GuidoPosts: 153
Re: Anybody else getting Jaime spam? 1/31/2006 12:20:46 PM
Only the people who post on that ""board which name shall not be mentioned"" will probably receive Jaime spam, though the gay bondage website that I found in my bulk mail folder curiously resembles Jaime''s in context and syntax. I personally do not post on the website for that Robstown fishwrap, as to do so would lower my own standards while appearing to raise theirs. That little group would be dangerous if they were not so pathetically small-minded. Someone should tell them that ""Blogger"" is not a professional occupation. Blogging is a hobby, and should not be one''s lifework.
UltimateMoviePosts: 262

Re: Anybody else getting Jaime spam? 1/31/2006 3:52:12 PM
i''ve never posted there.
HardcoreHarryPosts: 1793

Re: Re: Anybody else getting Jaime spam? 1/31/2006 4:01:01 PM
I''ve never posted there either. I don''t need to, Jaime cuts and pastes all the relevant posts over there already. Besides, Homer knows what I think of his rag and his politics. It must really be burning Jaime up to be relegated to the role of a lurker here on these boards. Lets see, he has a blocg with cut and pasted material from here, he cuts and pastes to El Dependzor and now he cuts and pastes the same thing in pointless emails. Hardcore Harry
UrielPosts: 246
Re: Anybody else getting Jaime spam? 1/31/2006 6:13:43 PM
What other board? EVW has a different one? I haven''t gotten any spam stuff. I agree with Harry...its not the economics...its the access. But also I am concerned about what sort of ''entertainment'' will come to our beaches...I am concerned about our children.
Wild ApePosts: 2015

Re: Re: Anybody else getting Jaime spam? 2/1/2006 6:27:38 PM
Uriel. Trust me. The party is here. Any other board is a waste of time.
UrielPosts: 246
Re: Re: Re: Anybody else getting Jaime spam? 2/1/2006 10:08:34 PM
Oh SO RIGHT! All yall are the best people and deserve major blessings! I only post here, except last week I joined another forum, about the Knights Templars topics. History class led me to this interest. Two sites are enough for me, though, or else I''d NEVER get any homework done! Uriel :D

Nueces De La Parra: South Texas Chisme: Nueces County Chair

2006-01-30T23:13:00.000-08:00

Nueces De La Parra: South Texas Chisme: Nueces County Chair

Jones brought Homer in for controversy and ratings for his show..and it worked

2006-01-28T22:35:00.000-08:00

Elwood Blues - 10:39am Jan 26, 2006 Central (#30 of 39) "I'm NOT the "voice of reason"
Jones brought Homer in for controversy and ratings for his show..and it worked.But Eric's right in this case..Homer has no affiliation in any way,shape,or form with the station.
Eric sees Homer as a pandering racist who supports illegal immigration.I'm not going to argue the point one way or another,this isn't my fight,and I'm no fan of either of them,but Eric seems to loathe Homer and you pushed his buttons when you kept arguing that the station "offered" Homer something when they clearly didn't.. Jones did. No point in arguing it with me,dude..as I said..I don't care one way or the other,but if you're going to try to argue with a man about the company he works for..you're better off taking his word for it.
"I do respect that you chose not to pile on top of me..And you could have."
Oh..the thought crossed my mind,to be sure.You've given me more than enough reason to with some of the crap you've pulled on me in the past,but I'm not one to kick a man when he's down,and right now,you're standing in the middle of a kennel wearing milk bone underwear.
Just remember that the next time you think about pulling some crap on me.
Elwood Blues - 06:35pm Jan 26, 2006 Central (#31 of 39) "I'm NOT the "voice of reason"
Dammit Jaime!
I just checked your blogspot (it's being ridiculed on the board you're banned on)...and guess what I find? My posts AND my screen name being used on your site!
What part of "I don't want my name associated with you" is so goddamned hard for you to grasp?
Go ahead..tell me to "get over it"...........
Jaime Kenedeno - 08:21pm Jan 26, 2006 Central (#32 of 39)
EB point taken.
To me it is unrealistic to put only a piece of a thread. I believe the reader needs to read tho whole and not just pieces out of context.
I am giving you credit as I would in any research bibliography.
I am not doing it to piss you off.
Would you like me to ask permission is that what it is?
So you can say no?
You will see in the end Elwood.
I slept better than I have in a long time.
All I said was that KEYS made Homer an offer.
John Gifford told me, "We brought Homer in to give our listeners a different perspective."
So be it.
It is really insignificant but Eric hammerred me for that one sentence.
Am I supposed to relax and enjoy it?
I tried the email route so not to stand up to him in public.
The going to hius advertisers is all about what he is spewing on his board and what he is saying about mexican types, robstown types etc etc. If he cant tone his hate down then maybe hge needs a reality check.
I have been asked by my wife and Homer Villarreal not to go to his advertisers.
This biased view from both sides is wrong.
Elwood Blues - 09:24am Jan 27, 2006 Central (#33 of 39) "I'm NOT the "voice of reason"
"I am giving you credit as I would in any research bibliography."
What you simply can't understand is,I don't want credit,Jaime.If I want my screen name being dragged into this,I'll do it myself.I don't work for KEYS,I don't work for Defenzor.I'm certainly no Eric fan,but I'm no Homer fan,either.Eric may have punked you,but let him do it by refusing to just "let it go".
Co-host..guest host..hostess Twinkie..who cares,Jaime? If it doesn't matter to Homer..why should it matter to you?
Jaime Kenedeno - 01:01am Jan 28, 2006 Central (#34 of 39)
Cuz the Displaced Frustration is based on that very statement EB.
He is wrong.
He cannot even address the issue.
He twisted and called names.
One doesnt need to use personal attacks when he has the truth and the facts on his side.
KEYS did make Homer an offer
It is the principle of the altercation I am addressing.
John Gifford said "WE brought Homer in......"
Eric W. - 01:05am Jan 28, 2006 Central (#35 of 39)
Does it really matter? Do you think Goat Boy will be on after Tuesday?
Elwood Blues - 10:50am Jan 28, 2006 Central (#36 of 39) "I'm NOT the "voice of reason"
Yeah..he'll still be on.He's doing exactly what Jones hoped he'd do..create controversy and build ratings,and that's what all this is about after everything's said and done.
Jones' show was languishing at the bottom of the local gabfest list.Even "Chismoso Carranza" was pulling better numbers at times.Enter Homer,throw in a hefty dose of race baiting,mix in a few hotheads,a couple message boards..and voila! Jones' rating skyrocket.
Gifford will gladly deal with a little flak from the Jaimes because as staion manager..he's in it for the ratings.In talk radio..it's all about what will make the phones light up,and love him or hate him..Homer's making the phones light up.
As a Homer fan,Jaime..I'd suggest you drop the whole thing and sit back and let your boy do what Jones brought him in to do.You won't, I know..that's just not in your nature,but that's what somebody with a measure of common sense would do.Some "battles" just aren't worth fighting,dude.Besides..you're getting what you want,aren't you? Your boy's on the radio..he's spreading his "message" (whatever it is) so..who really cares how he got there?
BTW..Please spare me as to whatever it is Homer's "message" is or about.I've seen enough of his postings and that of his followers on his board to know both he and they talk out of both sides of their mouths for the most part.

Deleted orion and madmax. Glitch tells em like it is.

2006-01-28T01:53:00.000-08:00

To: Elwood & Wild Ape 1/26/2006 9:20:33 PM
Inre: That other place I do appreciate the efforts ya'll put forth in my defense. The entire thing was so bizzare as to almost be comical. Next time I see ya'll, I'll give ya a great big hug. Or maybe buy you a beer. Pax BB
Collapse all posts in this thread
Author
Replys
curmudgeonPosts: 3285

No hug for . . . 1/26/2006 9:53:01 PM
. . . for El Vato Loco or ChiChi Grande?
BlindBobPosts: 522
Re: No hug for . . . 1/27/2006 12:43:25 AM
Shoot, man. They thought I was YOU. And they hate you so much that their eyelashes curl back into their heads at the very mention of your name(s). For all the crap I hadda take in your name, you should buy ME a beer. ROFL!
HardcoreHarryPosts: 1781

Re: Re: No hug for . . . 1/27/2006 12:34:20 AM
Kinda like teasin the special ed students in the end, it might be fun for a while; but, they offer such a pitiful defense, ya have to feel sorry for em all. Hardcore Harry
curmudgeonPosts: 3285

Man! Those folks are stupid . . . 1/27/2006 7:03:37 AM
. . . they can''t tell you from El Vato Loco. I just thought you pissed ''em off some way. Anyway, I guess I owe you a beer.
GlitchPosts: 1
Re: Man! Those folks are stupid . . . 1/28/2006 2:58:52 AM
I thought this was America, free speech and all, no censorship...LOL Not really is it? You delete posts and disable accounts of people that don''t agree with your point of view...ie, madmax & orion...I was under the mistaken opinion this was a ""discussion forum"" not a neo-nazi offshoot organization...what a group of hippocites and losers, not even man enough to ""discuss"", but rather sweep the problem under the rug! LMAO I know I will lose my account after this post...AGAIN! LOL Don''t worry about me ""proxy-ing"" in the future...I have determined the cloth you all are cut from and the fabric is tainted! Later...
EVWPosts: 347

Re: Re: No hate for . . .Eric? 1/27/2006 8:15:01 AM
I feel kind of left out. I guess it''s only fair that Curm be the most hated I am covetous of the position. It is a badge of honor when you consider the source.
Wild ApePosts: 1919

Re: Re: Re: No hate for . . .Eric? 1/27/2006 10:51:46 AM
I agree Eric. I envy Curm in that I feel like the Quisling of the group. I should have drank more Hateraid. Giveing these clowns an uncouth slamming is a virtue. They go beyond misguided. They are purposeful in the results they want.
Elwood BluesPosts: 125

Re: To: Elwood & Wild Ape 1/27/2006 2:19:08 AM
Anytime,BB. I''d been following what was transpiring,and they just started coming out of the woodwork at you,even though all of them put together didn''t have half your intellect.In reading your posts over there,and their responses..you must have felt as though you were trying to explain quantum physics to an orange,or in this case,a bushel of oranges. I actually learned something from watching you though,BB.. 1.Never use metaphors when talking to people with I.Q.s under 80. 2.Never underestimate the intelligence of stupid people in large groups. 3.Neither you,curm,Ape,nor I have much a of a shot at being elected Mayor of Robstown. You didn''t seem to break a sweat in dispatching the acolytes,and you sure didn''t need any help from me,but I''ll take the beer just the same..I''m no fool. Nice job..even if it was a largely wasted effort,BB.
Wild ApePosts: 1919

Re: To: Elwood & Wild Ape 1/27/2006 6:59:40 AM
I''m not going back. I even got weird on ''em and then they seemed to get civil. Never seen a blinder bunch of racists.
GuidoPosts: 147
Re: Re: To: Elwood & Wild Ape 1/27/2006 8:35:47 AM
This was the Defenzor Doofi''s (doofi, plural for doofus) one foray into the mainstream. Now that they have gotten the boot, they are in a frenzy over anyone who can still post over here. I had a boss who was a part of the Latino movement back in the 70''s, his take on people like this group is that ""they went on a long march and never came back"".

Eric sealing his fate

2006-01-28T01:08:00.000-08:00

Eric why do you use "Hispanic BIGOTS." 1/18/2006 10:04:32 AM
Homer has not used the word "Anglo bigots" on the air. Why do you accusing him of something you are responsbile for? The issue of race or "racism" has not been in Homer's vocabulary. I think you have him all wrong. Yet you use it repeatedly when referring to "them." contradcition --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Collapse all posts in this thread
Author
Replys
EVWPosts: 347

Re: Eric why do you use ""Hispanic BIGOTS."" 1/18/2006 10:11:52 AM
Listen closely Condot, Markx, Homer and the like, the reason I call Homor a Hispanic Bigot is because that''s what he is. Read a dictionary if you don''t know what a ""bigot"" means but of course you would run the risk of speaking from an educated position and the other Hispanic bigots you admire so much might challenge your ethnicity with terms such as ""sell-out"" or ""coconut"" or some other crap copied from radical black bigots. You and other trash like you are bigots because you blindly and zealously take positions based on skin color or ethnicity not facts, education or merit. You haven''t grown up mentally and you think the most moronic, juvenile antics are the coolest thing ever. You don''t just want to divide white from brown but you can''t stand a conservative Hispanic either. What you really can''t stand is the fact America isn''t Mexico and instead of becoming and loving America you want to make it like Mexico. You and that group of bigots are exactly what holds this country down. You and your ilk of bigots disgust me. You’re no different than the 1950''s Good O''le boys of Mississippi. Does that answer your question? The reson Homer doesn''t use the term is because some else hasn''t explanied it to him. I was temped to say that it''s because the term aplied primarily to Homer and your little click but you guys are know to fabricate or at the very least propagate complete fabrications when ever it serves your purposes so I''m sure we''ll hear the little toad take a shot at it soon.
HardcoreHarryPosts: 1781

Re: Re: Eric why do you use ""Hispanic BIGOTS."" 1/18/2006 10:24:30 AM
Open, honest, and factual Eric. I am sure we will be hearing from the Dependzor unified cheerleading squad soon. They will have the same song and dance routine they have already displayed, kneepads at the read to genuflect at the order to their comandante el magnifico. Hardcore Harry
HardcoreHarryPosts: 1781

Re: Re: Re: Eric why do you use ""Hispanic BIGOTS."" 1/18/2006 10:29:33 AM
Dhould read ""kneepads at the ready..."" I intentionally left out the ""y"" so I could use ""kneepads"" in another insult at the Crayola Commandos from El Dependzor. Yeah! That''s the ticket! Hardcore Harry
HardcoreHarryPosts: 1781

Re: Re: Re: Re: Eric why do you use ""Hispanic BIGOTS."" 1/18/2006 10:30:53 AM
Heh I need more coffee this morning! Hardcore Harry
curmudgeonPosts: 3285

Keep it up . . . 1/18/2006 10:36:14 AM
. . . and you will be like ole Anton! Ole Homer has been much more subdued lately. I don''t think he got the Mexican uprising he was lookin'' for.
condotPosts: 104
Eric you''ve called Homer: ""racist, bigot, homo, unAmerican, etc"" 1/18/2006 1:06:49 PM
You are against everything you are standing for. In your latest post, why the disrespect for Homer by refering to him now as ""Homo(r)""? You need to return to level you were before. Why demonise him to the level of animal. I do not blame him if he fires back at you and us all. He has family and friends that read your ""crap"" and he doesn''t have to put up with your stink.
CalPosts: 617
Re: Eric you''ve called Homer: ""racist, bigot, homo, unAmerican, etc"" 1/18/2006 4:34:04 PM
Hey there Alpha Hotel :bugeye: Did you not see his reply about the use of the word ""HOMO""? Eric said it was a typo and that reason is good enough for the rest of us. Time for you to leave and don''t let the door hit you on the way out.
Wild ApePosts: 1919

Cal, don''t confuse condolt with the truth 1/18/2006 4:45:14 PM
I like the Alpha Hotel thing too. Made me laugh.
MarkxPosts: 114
Eric, When has Homer used the words ""Coconut"" and ""traitor""? 1/18/2006 6:38:08 PM
I don''t know where you have come with this stuff from. If you are reading someing into it; that is not fact or logic or reasonably consistent with who and what he is. I''ve listen to every show and even recorded them. Again, never has be used ""coconut"" nor called anyone ""traitor"".... Homer did tell Jenny that she did not have to ""overaccomodate"" a target audience to make her point. She did not have to sell out her family nor where she comes from to please another social stratum. She was merely reminding Jenny, not to forget her roots. The aroma of ""pinto beans"" (my words). If Jenny was Anglo, I would have point out the same thing. Don''t forget your humble beginning. Coconut? traitor? Those are your words Eric, very immature.
MarkxPosts: 114
Eric, have we questioned why you use a hot pink hightlight when u post? 1/18/2006 6:48:36 PM
Does the highlight equate with personal proclivities? Unmanly -It''s absurd to conclude that.
Jaime KenedenoPosts: 1505

Eric if it is a typo..... 1/18/2006 8:51:08 PM
it is surely in your best interest to edit it? This is not becoming of this website. I notice there was a thread deleted that itstruthtime did the same thing to Eric, I dont blame Eric for being fired up, but becoming indignant will not help. Dont cause yourself more problems. Cool down and approach this thing logically Eric. Once again I thank you for allowing me to stand up for myself in here. I am not on either side as I have interest in each of you and your causes. Condot called me a Yellow Belly Coward as well. He challenged me to a fight at Whataburger in Kingsville. Condot you are making matters worse and making a fool of yourself. I support Homer and Eric and 1440 KEYS.
EVWPosts: 347

Re: Eric if it is a typo..... 1/19/2006 8:06:45 AM
You cant support good and evil, cold and hot, right and wrong. Jaime, I have seen you mature and grow in character and intellectualy since you first arrived at this website. Don''t let others pull you down just because they share your ethinicity. Some of histories greatest monsters were great with kids, dogs, and were the life of any party. It didn''t make what they did or stood for any better.
Elwood BluesPosts: 125

Re: Re: Eric if it is a typo..... 1/19/2006 10:24:23 AM
""Don''t let others pull you down just because they share your ethnicity"" Umm..Jaime''s an anglo,Eric.He ""advocates"" for La Causa,South Texas Gnomes,invisible priests and is KFATSO''s bitter enemy (and has a signed 8X10 glossy of Homer hanging proudly in his living room (next to the framed picture of Che Guevara)..but he''s an anglo.
EVWPosts: 347

Re: Re: Re: Eric if it is a typo..... 1/19/2006 10:29:38 AM
Now that''s funny, I don''t care who you are! I just don''t believe him. If it''s true then I am at a loss for how he became so utterly misinformed.
Elwood BluesPosts: 125

Re: Re: Re: Re: Eric if it is a typo..... 1/19/2006 10:55:49 AM
""If it''s true then I am at a loss for how he became so utterly misinformed."" LOLOL...have you read many of his posts? The boy isn''t exactly all there..if you catch my drift. But,yes..it''s a fact he''s an anglo.There are several threadsters here that can confirm that.In fact..there are a few of us here who know his real name..(and it doesn''t end in a ""z"" or a vowel) Ask him yourself...he''ll tell you.He''s Homer''s token gringo.
Jaime KenedenoPosts: 1505

All I am saying Eric...... 1/19/2006 4:18:52 PM
is if it is a TYPO then it is in YOUR best interest to edit it. If that is WATT you meant then fine leave it be. I am anglo, my wife is Latina. This is not about skin color it is about the haves and the have nots. Elite v the little people. I fight with the little people as I am a little person myself. Who is Homer to me and I to Homer? This fight originated in Kingsville and has nothing to do with El Defenzor. I came to EL Defenzor after I found the message board while researching the net in the Advocacy of my family. El Defenzor became my medium to publicize the events that occurred. Then came a time when I became mal-alligned with El Defenzor and the Nueces County Medical Examiner. I found Eric''s message board as I was banned fro El Defenzor. Eric supported my right to free speech. Eric, I will always be grateful for your support during that time. I cannot see myself in the middle of this squabble. Elwood you are just JEALOUS. My words are being confirmed verified and bona-fide everyday by many at much higher levels. I dont need to keep on fighting as I have already established these postulates. WATT happened to ignoring ME? Your word is worthless. But then again, if you ignore ME then that would make you ignorant..... right?
EVWPosts: 347

Homer: ""racist, bigot, homo, unAmerican, etc"" and It''s All True! 1/19/2006 7:58:42 AM
It''s called reality Mr. Condot. My family and friends read the crap Homer and his rag of a newspaper puts out. I''ve been putting up with the offensive lies and racial accusations of people like you and Mr. Homer for years while you hide under the slimy rock of anonymity. I sign my name to every statement I make and have done for over 11 years. It''s time those of you who live on racial friction do the same. When Homer Villarreal refuses to say he pledges allegiance to the United States of America and instead calls the Hispanic woman who does a ""sell-out"" that is by definition, un-American. Homer is against everything I stand for as an illegitimate race baiting bigot. I guess you would like it if I have the head of the Klu Klux Klan on my show every Tuesday? If the truth hurts Homer and you and others so much, maybe you should do something about who you are instead of getting angry at me for calling you on it. As far as my stink Condot, what are you going to do about it? If the rest of the coastal bend has had to endure the mentally retarded such as you, Markx and Homer making completely false claims in Homer''s publication rag then he''ll take alot more from me before it''s over and that goes for you too tough guy. Homer better not find himself in the radio station when I''m there or he''s going to be even more embarrased. At 9:01 AM Homer better be laying rubber.
condotPosts: 104
Eric, u says: Homer ""copied from racial black bigots""? 1/18/2006 6:56:00 PM
Whose name are you implying? Jones. Be a man and say it.
condotPosts: 104
Eric, not Hispanic bigots, but only ""Black"" ones? 1/18/2006 6:57:56 PM
It time you tell me to my face the truth.... yellow-belly coward.
MarkxPosts: 114
Re: Eric, not Hispanic bigots, but only ""Black"" ones? 1/18/2006 7:14:12 PM
Eric Von Wade you write above referrring to Homer and I (I personally have never posted on his board): ""You and other trash like you are bigots because you blindly and zealously take positions based on skin color or ethnicity not facts, education or merit."" How do your remarks reflect ""facts"" or ""education"" or ""merit."" A bit hypocrically you are, perhaps?
EVWPosts: 347

Re: Re: Eric, not Hispanic bigots, but only ""Black"" ones? 1/19/2006 8:28:55 AM
Feel that sting, its called truth. You thought it was so funny when a bunch of people you work with called Jenny Trejo a Sell Out because she said she pledges allegiance to the United States of America. Those slackers followed Homer''s exact example. People like that are an enemy of the United States and therefore my enemy.
HardcoreHarryPosts: 1781

Calling Eric a yellow bellied coward... 1/18/2006 7:36:09 PM
is not liable to win you many style points here on this forum. It did not work when you tried it on me and I highly doubt it will work on Eric. However, do not be surprised if you find yourself on the outside looking in if you keep this up Condot. Like the Captain said, if you use words like ""coward"" and ""yellowbellied"" here on a message board, what do you have left in the tank for real offenses?? Just be glad we are not living in the age when such words would have you answer those accusations on a real field of honor. What would you know about honor anyway? You are too busy giving Homer the Hoover treatment to know jack shit about honor, Condot. You just might be the first person booted off El Depndzor and the Eric Von Wade boards. You already have the honor of the former, it remains to be seen what happens with the latter. If you have trouble understanding what I just told you, try reading a fookin book once in a while! Hardcore Harry
condotPosts: 104
Re: Calling Eric a yellow bellied coward... 1/18/2006 8:05:21 PM
I feel that drum beat. It calls me to action. It brings me to this website and to put out words that come from my heart. I cannot stand the politics of the day. I see both parties pandering to special interests and not to the voters. I have very little respect for the politicians of our day. Read Wild Ape''s message to homer on www.defenzor.net : Wild Ape: ""I feel that drum beat. It calls me to action. It brings me to this website and to put out words that come from my heart. ...I cannot stand the politics of the day. I see both parties pandering to special interests and not to the voters. I have very little respect for the politicians of our day. Trouble is Homer that someone has to take up the banner. If you are willing to be silenced then someone from the KKK will be happy to take your place and get his message across. I think we''ve all had enough of that."" Do you take those words back ""Wild Ape"" ??? I don''t take back mine either. It is not right what is being done to him by Eric.
HardcoreHarryPosts: 1781

Re: Re: Calling Eric a yellow bellied coward... 1/18/2006 8:28:35 PM
Gonna have to buy Ape a round! If he got those pecock feathers of yours ruffled that much he must be doing something right! Hardcore Harry
condotPosts: 104
What Eric is doing to Homer is down right low, gutter level 1/18/2006 8:34:43 PM
""Merit, Education"" - how is Eric accomplishes such things?
curmudgeonPosts: 3285

Homer''s stock in trade . . . 1/18/2006 8:44:11 PM
. . . is whining about being a poor Mexican. He tries to hang most of the blame on the evil gringo because they stole Texas from the Mexicans. Well, I see a lot of houses on Ocean Drive owned by Mexicans who succeeded dispite the gringos. When he sees someone like Jenni he has to brand them viendida to mask his own inadequacy.
skwardupntruPosts: 1482

To Continue in English.... 1/18/2006 8:55:57 PM
Press two Hmmmmm Sounds a might familiar :bugeye:
condotPosts: 104
Homer has never called her ""vendida"" 1/18/2006 8:56:49 PM
Vendida means ""you have already sold out"" in Spanish. ""No te vendas"" means ""Don''t sell out or overaccomodate who you are to others in order to fit in."" Semantics? Two differnt things. Apples (mansanas) and Oranges (naranjas). If I remember my Spanish correctly from High School.
condotPosts: 104
Jenni lives on ""Ocean Drive"", Curmy please... She''s unemployed and on 1/18/2006 9:00:21 PM
humble means.
curmudgeonPosts: 3285

Did I say . . . 1/18/2006 9:05:17 PM
. . . Jenni lived on Ocean Drive? Are there any Mexicans living on Ocean Drive. Actually, I think Homer actually said she was a sell out.
condotPosts: 104
Why would Homer envy her? He has 2 masters and plays some mean guitar? 1/18/2006 9:13:31 PM
Homer never said she was a ""sell out."" Never, Curmy. He said don''t overaccomodate your principals and ""don''t sell out who you are."" He did not say, ""You are a sell out!"" Never. ""Don''t sell out who you are,"" is far from calling someone a ""vendida"" (sold and bought).
Jaime KenedenoPosts: 1505

WATTS happened to Jenny.... 1/18/2006 9:22:59 PM
where did she go? Did somebody censor her? Does her Saturday show have something to do with her not writing in this room? I can only speculate as to the reason as Homer is not writing in here either. Obviously this is Eric''s board and he can write whenever. Also, where is Bob? He does write in here. Are they being censored?
curmudgeonPosts: 3285

George W. Bush . . . 1/18/2006 9:35:45 PM
. . . doesn''t post on here either. Doya figure he is being censored.
Jaime KenedenoPosts: 1505

Bob and Jenny both have..... 1/18/2006 9:41:36 PM
registered screen names here and have posted valid points of view pertaining to KEYS radio. Dubya, well..... he is your coffee mate. Maybe you need to consult with Caro;e Strayhorns son about that?
Jaime KenedenoPosts: 1505

Bob and Jenny both have..... 1/18/2006 9:41:54 PM
registered screen names here and have posted valid points of view pertaining to KEYS radio. Dubya, well..... he is your coffee mate. Maybe you need to consult with Caro;e Strayhorns son about that?
curmudgeonPosts: 3285

I''m havin'' a seance at the moment . . . 1/18/2006 10:10:45 PM
. . . I could ask Jimmy Hoffa if you like.
Jaime KenedenoPosts: 1505

Ask Catherine D''Unger..... 1/18/2006 10:19:22 PM
She is the investigator who died (under mysterious circumstances) while working for our Nueces County Medical Examiner. Still under investigation.
MarkxPosts: 114
Maybe Homer should not bring a guitar anymore, Eric goes puff 1/19/2006 1:55:27 AM
Eric said there was nothing good in Robstown. Homer guitar playing showed its richness and priceless capital. The only question I said is why did homer skipped that little part in the spar spangled banner?
EVWPosts: 347

Re: Why would Homer envy her? He has 2 masters and plays some mean guitar? 1/19/2006 9:26:16 AM
I heard Homer call Jenni a Sell-out more than once and you either missed it or are lying. Being a friend of Homer''s, I suspect the latter.
EVWPosts: 347

Re: What Eric is doing to Homer is Long Over Due 1/19/2006 10:36:08 AM
If you live like trash somebody is eventually going to tell you that you stink. If you don''t like it, try taking a bath. (This is a metaphor for your character.) Any other questions? Ask the nearest adult.
EVWPosts: 347

Re: What Eric is doing to Homer is Long Over Due 1/19/2006 10:38:11 AM
If you live like trash somebody is eventually going to tell you that you stink. If you don''t like it, try taking a bath. (This is a metaphor for your character.) Any other questions? Ask the nearest adult.
Wild ApePosts: 1919

Why are you crying? 1/19/2006 8:11:22 AM
What is to take back? I haven''t suddenly gained respect for politicians. I AM sticking up for hispanics moron. Why would I stop? I think Homer has changed his opinion on Atzlan and maybe can be turned on illegal immigration as well. If you think Eric speaks for the KKK then you are about as big an idiot as everyone on this forum (except Markx) thinks you are. I think what troubles you is that I haven''t pitched in with the crowd that wants to separate from America and shoot all the whitemen. My allegiance is still with America, not Mexico. Please by all means hold your breath and starve yourself until I switch over. If you are really interested condot then you should just listen to Eric''s show especially on Wednesdays. Eric is not a bigot. Homer has painted himself with his magazine and website. I think he is still forming who and what he is. If Eric ever said something bigoted I''d call him on it. If he began a racist show I wouldn''t tune in and I would no longer post here. Eric''s opinions haven''t changed, but the jury is still out on Homer. My Threadster friends who tune into his site are men whom I have great respect for. My hispanic friends help me understand things I do not get in their culture. Eric, and others may not understand the total meaning of La Raza. Their only exposure maybe that it is an anti-American movement. It is but it is not solely a separatist movement. For many it is just a rally point. Captain Corrales has an idea to make it an internal movement for a positive change. That is ''the Drum'' I listen to. These are sophisticated thoughts condot, probably too complicated for a cultural moron like yourself. Stick with One Fish Two Fish Red Fish Blue Fish and build from there. Taking a post from a site that is totally out of context or place only adds to confusion. Keep the boards separate. My friends over there know whether or not I''m two faced and they haven''t said so, ergo, you are the divisive turd in the punchbowl not me.
EVWPosts: 347

Re: Why are you crying? 1/19/2006 9:35:15 AM
The only thing that matters is that this bigoted trash is anti-American, at that point they are due only that which this country affords it''s enemy. Nothing else.
Wild ApePosts: 1919

Re: Re: Why are you crying? 1/19/2006 10:17:30 AM
You''ve had more run ins with Homer Eric. I''m still holding my opinion on Homer but your words do carry weight with me. The Captain seems to think otherwise and has never voiced a racist point of view on this forum or privately. That is why I withhold judgement and check out things out for myself. I''m not questioning your credibility or integrity. This forum is at the place where the teeth of the gears of culture are grinding. The fact is that white men are no longer a majority in Corpus and it is a matter of time before this happens throughout Texas. As these cultures come together there will be a commonality of how they deal with one another. The same thing happened when Martin Luther King touched the hearts of white culture and things changed. Somewhere along the line his message has been lost. The leaders of the day are the Al Sharptons and Jesse Jacksons who instead of looking at the merits of character have looked at the pigmentation and made it a sort of twisted business machine of hate. How can the civil rights movement shift from the I Have a Dream crowd to one that now wants segregation, wants people to be judged by the color of their skin, and who could care less about humanity? This could happen with the hispanic community too. The Captain Corrales crowd will no longer be heard or the Jenni''s will be marginalized. The Atzlan (hispanic KKK Atzlan that is)will be the dominant mindset among hispanics if this isn''t turned and we will be no better off than when the KKK was in power. It will just have an hispanic flavor is all. I''m with you on patriotism and I understand where you vehemence comes from. I want to see Atzlan hijacked into something positive. I want those who condone an open border to be exposed as the exploiters that they are. It is time the lefty-Mexico-first-America-sucks crowd gets a shower of cold reality.
EVWPosts: 347

Re: Eric, not Hispanic bigots, but only ""Black"" ones? 1/19/2006 8:12:33 AM
Who''s the one here not using their real name? You can come by the radio station and I think I can solve your problem unless you want to let me have your address?
EVWPosts: 347

Re: Eric, u says: Homer ""copied from racial black bigots""? 1/19/2006 8:10:37 AM
A slightly educated man wouldn''t ask this question but since you did I''ll explain it to you. The ""black biggots"" I refer to started popularizing names like ""coconut"" back in the late ''60s and ''70s. Bigots like Al Sharpton, Luis Farrakhan ect. Carful, you might be learning too much and now your a ""sell out"" ""oreo.""
MarkxPosts: 114
I admire Homer for not running to any of the civil rights organizations 1/19/2006 1:57:50 AM
Eric, Homer does need anyone to stand against you. He can hold his own ground. It is not right what you did ERicu.
Wild ApePosts: 1919

Re: I admire Homer for not running to any of the civil rights organizations 1/19/2006 7:47:16 AM
Go take condot and Homer on a camping trip and get your Broke Back Mountain moment overwith. Pleease. Honestly, this much sucking up to your icon is revolting. Change it up or something, make a sonnet or write a biography and put it in A&E. Quit typing on kneepads.
curmudgeonPosts: 3285

Yeah, I can see it now . . . 1/19/2006 7:55:00 AM
. . . Homer tellin'' LULAC that evil Eric called him a homo and told him to stick his guitar up his hiney. BWAHAHAHA!!! Homer ain''t sayin'' anything because he wants to stay on the radio . . . gringo radio.
CalPosts: 617
Re: Yeah, I can see it now . . . 1/19/2006 9:13:00 AM
Homer ain''t sayin'' anything because he wants to stay on the radio . . . gringo radio. Let Homer team up with Vicente Caranza :D. Those two would be a great pair.But then,Maybe Vicente is smart not to get involved with Homer :bugeye: Vicente has been rather quiet these last few years. ;)
EVWPosts: 347

Re: I admire Homer for not running to any of the civil rights organizations 1/19/2006 9:28:42 AM
Did you let your child write the last post? Homer is trash and he can''t hold is own to a fight he won''t show up to. What a sad life when your hero is a looser.
MarkxPosts: 114
Eric, So now u want to ""eliminate?"" the ""unAmerican"" Homer? 1/19/2006 9:46:21 AM
You''re are using ""sick"" logic. To you, Homer is Al Queda, the Taliban, ""an enemy of the united states and must be dealt with accordingly,"" ""He is a monster"" because he loves his children?... Explain to me why Homer needs to be phased out like Al Queda and the Taliban. Don''t you realize Homer owns a flag too, but does not wrap up himself in it.
EVWPosts: 347

Re: Eric, So now u want to ""eliminate?"" the ""unAmerican"" Homer? 1/19/2006 10:01:20 AM
He''s worse than a Terrorist. He plays like an American so he can drive suspicous, hateful wedge between Hispanic and Anglo, dividing America. Just look at the trash you''ll defend on his behalf. Years of outright lies printed as fact in a so-called paper that more often than not has no author''s name attached to the story. I truly pity the lack of natural intelligence those like you exhibit. And by the way, we don''t go to phsyical war with every enemy of the united states. Are you really this stupid or are you just pretending because you think it''s some sort of strategy? If I wanted to ""elimenate"" someone, I''d say so. Your the only one who didn''t get that.
Wild ApePosts: 1919

Sedition 1/19/2006 10:36:20 AM
Anyone who plots to separate America in an insurrection or who approves of such is a traitor. They are just as bad as the Taliban and should be shot. Hitler liked dogs and Aryan children too but he is still a monster. If there is ever an insurrection you count on me killing as many separatists as possible. There is a difference between talking about civil rights and civil war. Apparently Markx, you think they are one and the same. We don''t rewrite history here. I recall Homer saying that Jenny was a sell out. I seem to recall you saying it as well. I''ve seen you distort my posting on another board to paint me up as some sort of kiss ass. Eric calls you out and you don''t have enough spine to do any more than post a lie on his forum. You are the coward. You are the liar. I''ve seen your tactic before. You keep repeating the lie until the opposition quits responding then you herald it as true. This tactic is to discredit new or intermittant posters into thinking that Eric and his supporters are bigots. I have no doubts where your inspiration comes from CONdot and Markx (as in Karl Marx). Your lies have no traction. You give Robstown a bad name. You are the poster boy for why people shouldn''t commit incest.
condotPosts: 104
Eric, why makes u say Homer isTrash, treasoner, Taliban-like, 1/19/2006 11:12:54 AM
You logic is: UnAmerican (like the Taliban) should be dealt accordingly Homer is unAmerican; Thus Homer needs ""is worst than a terrorist"" and should be dealt according. Note: Eric, if your assumption are not true about your premise, then your whole syllogism structure is wrong: it is a foundation of sand. Homer is as ""American as applepie."" He played the Star Spangle Banner as his opening piece with his guitar. How much more American can one be. As far as calling Jenny a ""sell out."" He never did. He said ""don''t sell out who you are"" (principles, roots etc). Eric, I can''t stand here and want you makes or encourage such threats against Homer. He is not ""white"" like us. He is ""American"" in his own way. IT is not up to us to decide how he should celebrate it. Eric, do not encourage attacks against Homer. His family was almost killed last week. I''m sure you heard about. Someone took the bolts off his back tires......... Eric you act of encouraging violence is dangerous..... Take off that flag off your back and come back to reality.
EVWPosts: 347

If the Jack boot fits... 1/19/2006 11:30:36 AM
Homer is a liar, bigot and a phony. I don''t believe someone took the bolts off his wheel. Most likely the thick little man forgot to put them back himself and fabricated the story for attention. If someone did take the bolts off, it''s one of your type that lives, thinks, and operates in this low level base mentality. If you lay down with dogs you get up with fleas.. You too Condot have shown yourself to be dishonest as months ago you tried to blame the termination of your friend at Spohn Hospital on some of the postings on this website. It was clear your intentions were to intimidate me through fear of involvement in a lawsuit over the termination so that I would block the posts from the one making the incoherent accusations. Your dishonesty didn’t achieve what you wanted then and it certainly won’t now. I know your type and you are not fooling anyone.
curmudgeonPosts: 3285

Homer is more dangerous tha al Qaeda . . . 1/19/2006 11:15:48 AM
. . . at least al Qaeda has the balls to attack us directly. Homer supports the cowardly invasion of the U.S. by Mexico through the back door. They will overthrow the government using the ballot box.
condotPosts: 104
Eric, so now you are saying all that sympatize with Homer be targeted? 1/19/2006 11:16:11 AM
Eric, you have gone too far. Don''t dirty our flag. Eric Hoffer, the great American Patriot said, ""Patriotism can be a refuge for scondrels."" Don''t stain the flag with your twisted concept of what is an ""American.""
jwsPosts: 49
Re: Eric, so now you are saying all that sympatize with Homer be targeted? 1/19/2006 12:49:26 PM
Just where in this post did Eric say he wanted to ""target"" anyone. Man you are REALLY grasping for straws now. ""Don''t dirty our flag""???? What the hell is that supposed to mean? I have NEVER, EVER heard Eric say anything Un-American. And a bigot??? You must be absolutely insane. Either you don''t listen, or are just making up more lies. Which is it condot???
condotPosts: 104
Debating Ernie Jr in one thing; Homer is another 1/20/2006 12:20:04 AM
I''ve seen Homer debate, and at the time I was cheering for the opposition at a university. Homer might make ole Eric starting wearing glasses again. Homer is cool dude. Humble, but at times a true believer.
curmudgeonPosts: 3285

I saw Homer in action, too . . . 1/20/2006 7:39:11 AM
. . . pitiful, just pitiful.
EVWPosts: 347

Condot''s School for the Mentally Challanged 1/20/2006 8:53:24 AM
I have never seen someone so enthralled with someone so absolutely void of any traits worth admiring. There is no way you can actually be for real. Let me know your ethnic background. There might be something to this genetic inferiority concept after all if you really believe what you are saying.
Wild ApePosts: 1919

Re: Condot''s School for the Mentally Challanged 1/20/2006 3:48:05 PM
It is a pity he hasn''t heard of Alfred E Neuman. He may have a a whole new hero to worship.
EVWPosts: 347

Absolutely, I don''t know how I could be anymore clear. 1/20/2006 9:04:34 AM
Condot, don''t try to be an American poet because for one you don''t have the intelligence and second you don''t love America. You love the little segregated brown v. white America which you and other Anti-Americans like Homer Villarreal and Markx dream of becoming Mexico II the dirtier, poorer sequel. How dare you talk to me about the flag you at best only give half your allegiance to!
MarkxPosts: 114
Eric will always be a SECOND BANANA 1/20/2006 7:52:12 PM
If you feel Homer tampered with the bolts of his own tire to kill his family, your banter is your inhumanity. Eric why would you wrap up yourself in a flag. Erif Hoffer in his book THE TRUE BELIEVER said it best. ""The flag is a refuge for scondrels."" There''s an angle here, you thought you would ""axe"" Homer. but he has already ""beaten"" you by default. He turned you into an adrilin junkie.... He is probably laughing away staring at the stars playing his little guitar singing: ""Pink Highlight, lost his fight; Ericana wants to be the number one banana; but in all truth, hardcore Harry, he will always be a SECOND BANANA."" Hehehehehehehehe.
condotPosts: 104
Markx I disagree on ""Second Banana"" 1/20/2006 7:55:26 PM
Eric is just ""dust in the wind"" for Homer.
curmudgeonPosts: 3285

You and Markie seem to show up together . . . 1/20/2006 8:03:22 PM
. . . like Anton and Danny the Demented One. Y''all ain''t fixin'' to have one of them Broke Back Mountain moments, are ya? Do y''all flip to see who is pitchin'' and who is catchin''?
MarkxPosts: 114
pinky highlights? 1/20/2006 8:10:47 PM
put the avocado i say, perhaps esperanza.
MarkxPosts: 114
ERIC, YOU ARE ENVIOUS of HOMER''s rise to fame 1/23/2006 12:31:12 AM
It gonna be okay Eric. Chill. Be loyal to the station.
curmudgeonPosts: 3285

My radio . . . 1/23/2006 8:07:09 AM
. . . has a channel selector. If I want to listen to Mexican radio I know where to find it. In the mean time . . .

Did the THREADSTERS defend YOUR Honor ERIC? TEN against ONE is that how you guys like to play?

2006-01-28T00:41:00.000-08:00

EVWPosts: 347

Thanks to the true vonWadesters!1/27/2006 9:39 AM

Just to freshen you all's memory, I found this as I was deleting old threads to help speed the load time. It's amazing that I said some of the very same things to the very same people just this week. Some people never change. Thanks to the true vonWadesters! 1/14/2005 4:30 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I want to first sincerely thank all of the true threadsters for calling the truth down on the lying, deceptive, and instigative, low-character individuals who are nothing more than petty personal agenda users of this site. You have all been calling it exactly as it is when it comes to this Jaime/Condott spat. It is absolutely impossible for anyone to get fired from any job based on what either one of these two have said on this website. The reason is that NO ONE can follow the rantings. It makes NO sense to me and I have tried real hard. Don't take this as an offense but the truth is that there has been way too much emotion and attitude and zero flow or evidence for any substantial point to be understood by anyone but maybe Jaime and Condott. It isn't against my site's policy to be a raving lunatic who lives in an intentional fantasy land. Although, it's very clear to me that of the two, Jaime and Condott, Jaime has made efforts to be a part of this board and find genuine interest in other subjects to disscuss. On the other hand, Condott has shown he posses the ability to act like a decent human being with his post about the potential of this city having a hispanic mayor. That aside it is patently clear that Codott is playing the juvenile games of the typical chip-on-the-shoulder, race-baiting, lawsuit happy Democrat. It is clear that Condott wants us to think his buddy got fired from his job because of the incomprehensible rantings of a chat site. Condott knows better and it's yet another example of his intellectual dishonesty. Condott is running the agenda of ignorance,hate, and racial bigotry indicitive of the website from whence he came. Due to the fact that, making illogical and irrational claims to serve a hidden agenda that no one can understand or cares about, is not a free speech crime. At this point I would ask that the decent threadsters simply refuse to enguage any posters, especially those in question, in any discussion dealing with their personal gripes. As it is now if my patience wears any thinner I'm going to be booting threadsters and I'm going to start with Condott so If you want to stay you need to staighten up and fly right and I don't want the slightest hint of attitude or it will be the last. There is no need to hear a response on this issue from Jaime or Condott. Just comply or say goodbye.
Eric von Wade

It is funny how you speak to ME without my ability to reply?

2006-01-27T23:59:00.000-08:00

GuidoPosts: 147
I have mixed feeling about this...1/26/2006 10:24 AM
A part of me wants Eric to slam the door shut on these imbeciles who preach the Aztlan crap to the "masses" which usually consists of a handful of Robstownites who feel disenfranchised because their Welfare check is late. Generally this group can be found sitting on an old couch on their front porch drinking a quart and bemoaning their "plight". It pains me as much as the rest of the working populace that our tax dollars keep them in Bugler and Budweiser. Yet, another part of me thinks that shunning this gaggle of idiots to some forgotten corner is more dangerous than allowing them to rant here, so that they can be seen as what they really are by thinking, rational folks. In other words, we should at least be mindful of the lunatic fringe, so that we can best wrap them in a straight jacket when the time comes. Sure, we can go over to "that other board" and see their spiel, but most of their threads degenerate into a bathering diatribe that I find boring after a bit. I would much rather read them here and know that there are countless others who think they are just refugees from the short bus. Lastly, I understand that this board is Eric Von Wade's to do with as he pleases. Further, I can imagine being just a bit frustrated that a small group is trying to foster a sentiment that is radically incongruent to the views and values of Mr. Wade. The fact that some moron would threaten a successful talkshow host by going to his advertisers is easily enough to justify such action. However, I believe that allowing such a simpleton to post his views here would, merely by the text of his/her ravings, prove any argument posed by those of a contrary viewpoint.

This is where the TALKER lied in Writing and said it was typo. This is a boldface LIE!

2006-01-27T23:53:00.000-08:00

Eric if it is a typo.....1/18/2006 8:51 PM
it is surely in your best interest to edit it? This is not becoming of this website. I notice there was a thread deleted that itstruthtime did the same thing to Eric, I dont blame Eric for being fired up, but becoming indignant will not help. Dont cause yourself more problems. Cool down and approach this thing logically Eric. Once again I thank you for allowing me to stand up for myself in here. I am not on either side as I have interest in each of you and your causes. Condot called me a Yellow Belly Coward as well. He challenged me to a fight at Whataburger in Kingsville. Condot you are making matters worse and making a fool of yourself. I support Homer and Eric and 1440 KEYS.

You all sure did show your true colors quick! WOW I am floored! GTF outta South Texas!

2006-01-27T01:22:00.000-08:00

BlindBobPosts: 527
To: Elwood & Wild Ape 1/26/2006 9:20:33 PM
Inre: That other place I do appreciate the efforts ya'll put forth in my defense. The entire thing was so bizzare as to almost be comical. Next time I see ya'll, I'll give ya a great big hug. Or maybe buy you a beer. Pax BB
Collapse all posts in this thread
Author
Replys
curmudgeonPosts: 3321

No hug for . . . 1/26/2006 9:53:01 PM
. . . for El Vato Loco or ChiChi Grande?
BlindBobPosts: 527
Re: No hug for . . . 1/27/2006 12:43:25 AM
Shoot, man. They thought I was YOU. And they hate you so much that their eyelashes curl back into their heads at the very mention of your name(s). For all the crap I hadda take in your name, you should buy ME a beer. ROFL!
HardcoreHarryPosts: 1798

Re: Re: No hug for . . . 1/27/2006 12:34:20 AM
Kinda like teasin the special ed students in the end, it might be fun for a while; but, they offer such a pitiful defense, ya have to feel sorry for em all. Hardcore Harry
Elwood BluesPosts: 125

Re: To: Elwood & Wild Ape 1/27/2006 2:19:08 AM
Anytime,BB. I''d been following what was transpiring,and they just started coming out of the woodwork at you,even though all of them put together didn''t have half your intellect.In reading your posts over there,and their responses..you must have felt as though you were trying to explain quantum physics to an orange,or in this case,a bushel of oranges. I actually learned something from watching you though,BB.. 1.Never use metaphors when talking to people with I.Q.s under 80. 2.Never underestimate the intelligence of stupid people in large groups. 3.Neither you,curm,Ape,nor I have much a of a shot at being elected Mayor of Robstown. You didn''t seem to break a sweat in dispatching the acolytes,and you sure didn''t need any help from me,but I''ll take the beer just the same..I''m no fool. Nice job..even if it was a largely wasted effort,BB.
OrionPosts: 1
Intellects??? 1/27/2006 3:12:26 AM
Let me see, just how many of you Threadsters make up this forum.........not many, 15 or less maybe. If anyone looks bad it is all of you, including Carrales, where is he now? Don''t go overboard on you and yours intellect thing.....the way all of you are carrying on here and at EL Defenzors is showing all of us the opposite of what you say you are. A true intellect would not be reduced to name calling and putting down others to make you all look smart. Evidently you think that by doing this you can compensate for your insecurities. Homer is doing a great job and you all have helped him look even better. You all sure did show your true colors quick!
MadMaxPosts: 1
Re: Intellects??? 1/27/2006 3:27:08 AM
From my seat, this forum looks as if it perhaps is a recruitment center for the KKK...is this true? If so, who is the ""Grand Dragon""? You crazy bastards! Life is meant to be enjoyed, not wasted by hurting others or harassing people you do not know. Go get the sheets out and burn a cross on somebodies lawn, not much different than what you display here and at other forums! As far as intelligence, anybody have a certified copy of their IQ test? I bet the speed limit is higher than most of the IQ''s here. Who types the posts for you? I don''t believe there is enough combined smarts to get a correctly spelled paragraph! Idiots like you were the ones that tried to get Rosa Parks to sit at the rear of the bus...move back to Alabama and GTF out of Texas! Have a nice day, and watch the short buses roll by, they are carrying YOUR children! LMAO

Republican and Anarchist logic breed Hate together. And you guys speak of Morals this is documentation

2006-01-27T01:18:00.000-08:00

HardcoreHarryPosts: 1798

Hey Eric, Jaime has a shrine up to you 1/26/2006 3:15:44 PM
Check it out: http://ericvonwade.blogspot.com/ Even when banned he just cannot get enough threadster lovin. Now it is the barrio boards or his little tribute to you. He may well suprass Sidewalk in cut-and-pasteology! Hardcore Harry
Collapse all posts in this thread
Author
Replys
Wild ApePosts: 1898

Our favorite conspiracy whacko... 1/26/2006 3:29:54 PM
You may want to ask Arnold but I don''t think that what Jaime is doing is legal. That is intellectual theft isn''t it? Not to mention that it isn''t his name to begin with. He is acting as if he is Eric VonWade.
HardcoreHarryPosts: 1798

Re: Our favorite conspiracy whacko... 1/26/2006 3:42:57 PM
Certainly seems that way to me Ape. Not saying anything but I was doing a little snooping and found something else there. If you email me I will let ya in on on the discovery. Hardcore Harry
sidewalk_cipherPosts: 2826

Re: Our favorite conspiracy whacko... 1/26/2006 4:49:04 PM
I don''t think that what Jaime is doing is legal. That is intellectual theft isn''t it? Well, I''m not a lawyer, but I know the anwser is no. Nothing we post here is copyrighted, and nothing on his blog is copyrighted...
lookingglassPosts: 2130

Re: Re: Our favorite conspiracy whacko... 1/26/2006 4:57:16 PM
ummm... sidewalk... scroll down to the very bottom of the screen and look at the small print...
HardcoreHarryPosts: 1798

Re: Re: Re: Our favorite conspiracy whacko... 1/26/2006 5:14:51 PM
Give the lass a cookie and send her to the head of the class! Who all thinks Jaime is just trying to provoke a legal showdown so he can get his stupid KFATSO materials out of his filing cabinets and submit them as evidence?? Jaime''s exit from the forums has nothing to do with Eric other than the fact he chose this place to broadcast his message. Jaime has a bigger fish he is trying to fry; trouble is he does not have a skillet big enough to hold it! Nor do I believe does he have the mental capacity to grasp his subject (outside of the outright lies and pure fabrications that he passes off for intellectualism), let alone present it in a logical fashion. Hardcore Harry
BlindBobPosts: 527
Sidewalk .... 1/26/2006 5:15:44 PM
Found in the Terms Of Use: Copyright All content included on this site, such as text, graphics, logos, button icons, images, audio clips, video clips, digital downloads, data compilations, and software, is the property of EricVonWade.com or its content suppliers and protected by United States and international copyright laws. The compilation of all content on this site is the exclusive property of EricVonWade.com and protected by U.S. and international copyright laws. All software used on this site is the property of EricVonWade.com or its software suppliers and protected by United States and international copyright laws.
sidewalk_cipherPosts: 2826

Doh... 1/26/2006 5:23:40 PM
Yup your right... Erics site is copyrighted... BUT, jamies is not copyrighted... and as far as I know what he''s doing falls within the terms of ""fair use""
anasazicoyotePosts: 474

Re: Hey Eric, Jaime has a shrine up to you 1/26/2006 10:14:34 PM
Pathetic is what it is. Can''t get traffic to his website on his own ideas or philosphies. Has to ""steal"" other''s content so his website isn''t just an empty page. that''s an analogy for ya.

John Gifford said, "WE brought Homer in to give the listeners a new perspective." YOU are JEALOUS!

2006-01-26T00:47:00.000-08:00

EVWPosts: 346

Want to see an example of Idiocy? Check This Out. 1/25/2006 10:25:47 AM
Let me set this up for those of you who haven't been following this controversy because after this thread their will be no more. This is a synopsis of how we got where we are. My Friend Bob Jones, host of the Morning Show on News/Talk 1440 KEYS is attempting to increase listeners by adding controversy to the show. Bob invites Homer Villarreal as a guest every Tuesday at 7:00 am. Homer has for a number of years published a yellow-journalism, gossip rag out of Robstown. As you can tell I personally have had numerous stories written about me over the last 11 years that have absolutely no basis in truth and are outright lies. Most of the authors from this Robstown Yellow-Rag never put their name to the story. I am, by far, not the only person who has been the target of Homer’s libelous publication. I have talked with others have also been attacked by the same publication about potential legal action in the form of a liable suit. Others before me had already investigated the prospect and found that the circulation of the publication was so low and the personal and professional assets of Homer Villarreal so miniscule that it was pointless to pursue. That being said, Homer Villarreal is an example of one of the worst elements of division in our country. His goal is to anger and divide the Hispanic population from the so-called Anglo population through race-baiting, propaganda. Homer refuses to pledge his allegiance to the United States of America but at the same time supports a group called "Azetlan" which is in practice a disorganized, emotionally fueled, racist, anti-white, pro-illegal immigration, anti-American organization that seeks to take parts of Texas and California for Mexico. The big deal on ericvonwade.com got started as three disciples of Homer V. posting under the alias of “Condot”, “Marx”, and “Jaime Kenedeno” attempted to give the appearance of acceptance and credibility to Homer by claiming that it was KEYS Radio who offer him a co-host position, that “KEYS” subscribed to the yellow-journalism publication that Homer puts out as well as many other falsely stated claims about the official decisions of KEYS Radio. I have made it patently clear that "1440 KEYS" had no part in Bob Jones’ individual decision to associate himself with or have as a guest. I in no way associate with, condone or tolerate the bigoted anti-American beliefs or illegitimate rhetoric of this individual directly or indirectly, including his publication. It's obvious that a small group of Homer Villarreal’s supporters cannot let go of the myth that their hero's presence on the Bob Jones show is anything more than a weekly guest appearance on the invitation of one individual talk show host. Individual talk show hosts, their actions and decisions, are that of the host and the host alone and not that of News/Talk 1440 KEYS. That last sentence should sound familiar as it is a disclaimer that runs every morning at the start of each broadcast day and is common throughout the broadcast industry. I have even referred one of these individuals to the Person who does have the authority and power to make official News/Talk 1440 KEYS decisions, Program Director John Gifford and now that same individual listener who wanted to argue with me about Homer's status is now arguing with the station manager. If you want to know why areas in S. Texas such as Robstown have such poor economic conditions and rampant corruption, it's due to the mentality of people just like those I have discussed. Below is an e-mail I received just before making this post. It is a classic example of the belligerence, intellectual immaturity and threats all too common in the bigoted, race-baiting, Hispanic-Democrat politics of South Texas. These are the character types that follow and are interested in listening to the likes Homer Villarreal. Their actions and beliefs hurt America and weaken it. They don't add to, but rather weight down the economy as typically they are in the lowest income bracket. I personally would not want to attract this type of listener base as it is so violently offensive to most Americans, Republican and Democrat. In my opinion it will drive the majority of listeners who possess the means to support advertisers away leaving only a small juvenile base of simpleton agitators. Just take a look at the almost incoherent rantings and threats sent to me in an e-mail as a very small example of the mentality I’ve discussed and which we all have to deal with in South Texas. Keep in mind, I specifically made it clear to the following individual that I did not want him to contact me any further concerning this issue and yet he did anyway. Jaime Kenedeno- 1/24/2006 I guess you want a war? I spoke with Mr. Gifford. You Eric have taken my words "KEYS made Homer an Offer" which KEYS RADIO did by contractual agreement verbal or otherwise and you are displacing YOUR frustration on the wrong person. "How is that >possible when Bob Jones is not the Program Director, General Manager, >or Owner of the Radio Station?" How was HOMER a co-host if BOB JONES has not the authority? NOW, after "the exchange" he is a guest; but he was a co-host. Can you not follow the reasoning? You are the one who is wasting my time if you choose to blow this little bitty thing out of proportion. Have you noticed that nobody has joined in your rant on me. By default you lose due to the personal attacks and name calling. KEYS is responsible for YOUR actions and HOMER was a co-host; so who made him "co-host"? You dont want to keep it up with me. You are convaluting yourself into believing YOU are right. In fact you jumped in on the discussion and I was not addressing you. I am doing this by email to save embarrassment for you and the Station. All of your disclaimer rhetoric is not legally binding. I am asking you to refrain from your personal attacks once again. ERIC YOU SAY , You dont know WATT I do for a living." Am I asking you for provisions? I am a legal advocate and you sir do not understand the legal ramifications of your words. Not to mention the fall out when I go to your advertisers. And you speak of yourself and JESUS in the same sentence? CHURCH OF CHRIST does not teach the hate you spew in indignancy. Get a grip on yourself Eric. I dont wan't to do this Eric. Here it is, I am about a cause for South Texas. El Defenzor is part of it and Your message board is a big part of it. Why is Homer on KEYS Radio? Because I stood up to him and you supported ME. Let us not ruin this. Please? Once again swallow a little pride and talk to me like a man. I can call you if you wish. Or you can call me or I will sit down with you and John but we should have a TALK. I AM NOT A BIGOT. And you sir know this. PAX
Collapse all posts in this thread
Author
Replys
HardcoreHarryPosts: 1837

That letter from Jaime is appalling!!! 1/25/2006 12:35:15 PM
Where does he get off threatening to go to your advertisers? That is insane!!! Then he goes on threatening legal action??????????? I fear Jaime has gone completely over the deep end! I would not give him or Homer or any of those fools from Robstown the time of day, let alone a face to face meeting. Give them all what they deserve Eric; kick them to the curb! This is your site, you are not the federal government, you do not have to suffer such fools on it; nor, are you the guarantor of their rights to free speech. Jaime clearly made a terroristic threat against your livelihood by threatening to go to you advertisers. Hardcore Harry
CommonSensePosts: 205
Seems to me that you need to talk to Arnold... 1/25/2006 12:40:33 PM
If I remember correctly, there is a law that provides you with a right to earn a living. Since the station and your show are dependent upon those who choose to advertise with your station/show, it then makes sense that anyone who willing goes to your advertisers with the sole purpose of convincing them to stop doing business with you is interferring with your ability to earn a living. From his statement, ""Not to mention the fall out when I go to your advertisers. "" .. it seems he may be intending to do this. Just a thought.
Elwood BluesPosts: 123

Re: Want to see an example of Idiocy? Check This Out. 1/25/2006 12:45:44 PM
Wow! This ""Aztlan"" crap has surfaced on another board in the last couple of days,and this side of the debate is not being presented there. May I have your permission to either repost this response,or post the link to it there,Eric? This is another side of the story that needs to be told.Should you consent or if you''d rather I didn''t..either way,I''ll respect your wishes. Thanks.. (See,Jaime?..THIS is how you do it..you respect someone else''s intellectual property and ASK THEIR PERMISSION before you go reposting them somewhere else)
EVWPosts: 346

Re: Re: Want to see an example of Idiocy? Check This Out. 1/25/2006 6:40:53 PM
Thanks for asking and your welcome to use this material I would just ask that you make every effort to represent it in context. Thanks again for everyone''s support.
mark blankenshipPosts: 1231
Re: Want to see an example of Idiocy? Check This Out. 1/25/2006 7:36:56 PM
Eric Thanks for clearly presenting the whole story for those of us who missed key pieces of it. Although I still do not know what Defensor said about you, it must have been pretty bad. I picked up a copy of Defensor and now see the agenda which you have been describing. Talk about being pro illegal immigration! WEW! There are many level headed people here in Corpus Christi, most of whom are Eric Von Wade show listeners, who can see through this whole Homer issue for what it is: infantile ""intellectualism"" in pursuit of an anti American agenda. I would have loved to see you (Eric) have a show on this, and you usually graciously allow the opposition to have their say. However, I would say the ""Homer gang"" have crossed the line and do not deserve to have their positions given the credibility of honest debate. I would also say Jaime Kenedeno, Condit, and Markx owe you a MAJOR apology. You have every right to ban them from Threadsterism at this point. As always, a faithful listener and fan, Mark
curmudgeonPosts: 3393

If we start banning folks . . . 1/25/2006 7:42:04 PM
. . . we are like them. It is more fun to have them around as punching bags.
EVWPosts: 346

Re: If we start banning folks . . . 1/26/2006 12:27:07 AM
I wouldn''t worry Curm, idots are alot like Doritos, you can chew up as many as you want and they keep making more. This little crew needs to be taught a lesson. They don''t control the world and they certainly don''t come in my house and tell me how it''s going to be.
mark blankenshipPosts: 1231
CALLING OUT JAIME KENEDENO!!! 1/25/2006 8:06:55 PM
Jaime, WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU THINKING!!!!! I had thought you had worked out the isuues you came here with and had graduated to being a normal person. Your correspondence to Eric was a HUGE disappointmet to me. POINT BY POINT [Jaime''s Quotes] [I guess you want a war?] Over Homer? Dude, it''s not worth it. How DARE you make such a threat to Eric. And over what? Eric and Homer are each entitled to their opinions. If you can''t win with facts I guess you have to make threats. [How was HOMER a co-host if BOB JONES has not the authority? NOW, after ""the exchange"" he is a guest; but he was a co-host.] What''s the big freakin'' deal! Co-host/guest--whatever! You would think there would be a grateful attitude to KEYS and their staff for Bob allowing the Homer to be on the air in the first place. By the way, a ""Co-host"" would be on every day, dont''cha think? [Have you noticed that nobody has joined in your rant on me.] Consider the battle now joined! [I am a legal advocate and you sir do not understand the legal ramifications of your words. Not to mention the fall out when I go to your advertisers.] I can tell you, Jaime, that if your legal advocacy is as ""eloquent"" (hehe) as your attacks here, Eric has nothing to worry about. HOW DARE YOU THREATEN TO GO TO ERIC''S ADVERTISERS!!!!!!!! Although I must say I would like to be there when they treat you like the NUT you have come off as here. [CHURCH OF CHRIST does not teach the hate you spew in indignancy. Get a grip on yourself Eric.] But the Bible clearly does allow for self defense, and if Defensor started this whole thing by slandering Eric, he has every right to respond in like manner. Jaime, Jaime, Jaime. Words cannot describe how disappointed I am with you. I thought you had grown since you first arrived here. Obviously, I was badly mistaken. You ask Eric to get a grip when you have clearly lost yours. Mark
curmudgeonPosts: 3393

Drop by the . . . 1/25/2006 8:22:02 PM
. . . El Defenzor site and ask for Goat Boy.
dannoynted1Posts: 559

JAIME KENEDENO is in the HOUSE!!!!! 1/25/2006 10:03:45 PM
For some reason I cannot log in as ME so here I am writing under dannoynted1. MARK B. There are two sides to every story You must refer to where this started and it was about fairness not HOMEr. HOMER CAN FIGHT HIS OWN BATTLES. As it is Eric needs somebody else to fight his. I guess you want a war?] Mark: ""Over Homer? Dude, it''s not worth it. How DARE you make such a threat to Eric. And over what? Eric and Homer are each entitled to their opinions. If you can''t win with facts I guess you have to make threats."" This statement is in my final communication with Eric so why do you address it first? This is not over Homer. I will refer you back to the statement Eric picked a fight with me over. I said, ""If KEYS radio can call Homer up and make him an offer then why couldnt Clear Channel"". I was not speaking to Eric. Eric proceeded to engage in name calling and twisting of my words. The facts are right there in the thread. He added in little subtleties like the word JOB which I never ever said. He added to my words so as to paint the picture he wants everyone to see. eric did not refrain and became even more indignant and abusive. I have still to call him any name or make any personal attack. I have stepped back and he keeps throwing crap. Mark: ""What''s the big freakin'' deal! Co-host/guest--whatever! You would think there would be a grateful attitude to KEYS and their staff for Bob allowing the Homer to be on the air in the first place. By the way, a ""Co-host"" would be on every day, dont''cha think?"" You might want to ask ERIC what the big fricken deal is, he is the one that has picked the fight. Homer was a co-host and was introduced that way up until ""the exchange"". That is a fact. After ""the exchange"" he is now a guest. As far as threats; it was not a threat. Eric is spewing hate. I will let the advertisers see for themselves what he is writing. Who knows they might applaud it like you are? I would like to let everyone know who is supporting this spewing of hate. Remember what happened when Howard Stern pissed off South Texas? Like you said Mark what is the big freakin deal? What is the big freaking deal Eric""? Also, send me my password so I can answer these calling outs in my own screen name. [Have you noticed that nobody has joined in your rant on me.] Mark: ""Consider the battle now joined! ERIC cant stand up for himself? I was addressing him privately so it would be between us but he done went cryin and you come running. With all due respect Mark,Stay out of the way! This is not your fight. Let Eric make an ass of himself like he has already. Not to mention he is putting himself and the station in a dilemma with his unwise choice of words. Eric you should never write when angry. Mark: ""I can tell you, Jaime, that if your legal advocacy is as ""eloquent"" (hehe) as your attacks here, Eric has nothing to worry about."" Then why is Eric writing anything? Why are you defrending the young BUCK''s honor? Forget about it and dont worry, since ""there is nothing to worry about"". Mark: ""HOW DARE YOU THREATEN TO GO TO ERIC''S ADVERTISERS!!!!!!!! Although I must say I would like to be there when they treat you like the NUT you have come off as here"". Threaten, I will go to the advertisers. I will ask em if this is what they stand for. I will show them what Eric is writing and then let them decide who the nut is. But dont worry about it since there is nothing to worry about. Mark: ""But the Bible clearly does allow for self defense, and if Defensor started this whole thing by slandering Eric, he has every right to respond in like manner"" Then let Eric take it up with Defensor not me. As I have stated Eric does have every right to respond in like manner. However he does that at the expense of lowering a standard. It is his perogative and I have maintained this posture. Mark: ""Jaime, Jaime, Jaime. Words cannot describe how disappointed I am with you. I thought you had grown since you first arrived here. Obviously, I was badly mistaken. You ask Eric to get a grip when you have clearly lost yours."" I was not responding to anything Eric or Homer were addressing with each other, I was responding to all of the others who want to join in and pile on. Let Homer and Eric jabber at each other and stand back and let them go one on one. If Eric wants to continue this with me over some obscure little statement I made that he takes issue with then fine let him and I deal with it. Why do you or anyone else need to defend him. I can defend myself. I have not defended Homer or Eric. I have spoken to an unfairness. MARKX anc Condot well,.... their arguements have nothing to do with me and they speak for themselves. Do not group me in with them. I am not going anywhere and how dare your ill fated atttempt to condescend to me. Mark you should go read how this started. I did not pick the fight. Eric is indignant and he feels he has every right to feel this way and maybe he does but he should not displace his frustration on me. He chooses to up the ante. I will oblige. I ask for peace. It is not a good thing to perpetuate THE HATE. It will back fire on Eric like it backfired on Howard Stern. I will say nothing else to this as it probably has done not a bit of good to explain to you. I am not against Eric but I will defend myself. Let it go?
bigoPosts: 427
Re: I''m curious...... 1/25/2006 9:09:34 PM
Jaime, if you went to Eric''s advertiser''s what would you tell them? That he doesn''t agree with you? That he said he didn''t like Homer. I guess I don''t understand or get the big picture like you do, but for the life of me, I can''t figure out how you could hurt Eics advertising dollars.
dannoynted1Posts: 559

Jaime Kenedeno is in the House!!! 1/25/2006 10:15:56 PM
I am a very resourseful MAN. Maybe I could show them his literature? Maybe they will applaud it? One thing all yous guys need to remember is that we live in SOUTH TEXAS. SOUTH TEXAS dont put up with HATERS. ASk Howard Stern?
Wild ApePosts: 1867

Re: Jaime Kenedeno is in the House!!! 1/25/2006 10:28:45 PM
Homer has nothing to lose yet he''ll bite the hand that feeds him. You have no morale high ground. You''re pitiful.
HardcoreHarryPosts: 1837

Republica con Homer El Magnifico! 1/26/2006 12:29:51 AM
It is all about advancing his agenda at all costs Ape. His agenda at the moment happens to evolves around one Homer Villareal, publisher of a ""newspaper"" that Jaime himself has himself said made untrue accusations against Eric. Agenda-wise, threadster debate following the Tuesday morning episode of Bob Jone''s show of which Homer V is a ""guest"" of, should center on praise and awe at the magnificence of non other than Homer V the man. Fact is last couple of weeks threadster debate has centered on the said bigot from Robstown, only thing is, instead of singing Homer''s praise we have been spanking his message and that of his ""groupies"" here on the forums when they put up their drivel. From henceforth, in the new “Republica con Homer El Magnifico” we threadsters must devote our Tuesdays to reflecting lovingly on the graven image of Homer Villareal and apologizing profusely to the other three Horseman of the Aztlan Apocalypse, Jaime Gotnobeanso, Mucky Muck Marky, and Cantdoit -Nevercouldeither. Carnival has come to town early this year ! Your pitiful recitation of you letter condemns you even further Jaime. You have worn out any goodwill you ever had here in these forums. If it were up to me you would be locked away in the loony bin where you most deservedly belong. Hardcore Harry
EVWPosts: 346

Jamie and Crew are not in Eric''s House Anymore 1/26/2006 12:21:39 AM
Jamie like Condot and Markx are angry simpleton agitators who can’t stand the fact that the thugery and threatening they are accustomed to dishing out doesn’t work on me and has come home to roost. This is my house and you only get to come in at my will and pleasure. You have proven yourselves to be dishonest and to have a sever lack of character. You are done. Change your life or wallow in its insignificant misery, the choice is yours. But whatever you, do you''ll do it some where else because you will not have your way here.